Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Default Removal - loan with Citifinancial now capquest


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3842 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

thanks renegadeimp it just seems to say, Defualt, but that payments are up to date

 

CITIFINANCIAL Who's this?

Entry Number: C12 | Account Updated to: 30/08/2009

Name: Address: Date of Birth: Account Type:question-mark.gif Loan Started:question-mark.gif 05/03/2008 Current Balance:question-mark.gif£7,144Payment Terms:question-mark.gif£201 x 60 months Default Date:question-mark.gif28/08/2009Default Balance: question-mark.gif£7,144Debt Assigned to CAIS Member:question-mark.gifStart Date:01/08/2009

What does the status of the default on the one CITI is managing say.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Dx had anohter good look through and all i can find in the SAR is

 

One credit agreement, of 5/3/08 which includes refinancing of existing loan

Screen notes back to December 09

Statements from 2009

Lots of copy letters from capqeust to me

Thats it thats all there is.

 

The only thing that seems to be referring to the exisiting loan is the amount thats addeed to the Credit agreement £2774.99

 

thansk for your help DX, they are threatening legal action so i need to sort this and grateful for your advice

well the same debt should not be showing twiced as teo sep accounts on your CRa file that's for sure

 

the original one, should be totally removed once the 'buyer' updates the CRa file

that they have bought the debt.

 

so poss you need to start a query with the cra people on say their 'chat' or 'problem' email address and ask why both are showing.

 

now onto the debt.

 

on the CCA you posted it show it was to 'pay off' [refinance, an earlier loan.

 

in the sar can you find any info to support this like statements etc?

 

dx

Link to post
Share on other sites

be a lot easier to understand if you print this out and send it to us as a pdf scan. the cra file dump above]

 

as for the missing data

 

you need to write to the

person that sent the sar return

and ak where the data is on the earlier loan

it is missing

 

as for the muppets chasing the debt

 

they can wait.

dx

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK so a scan of the Creditexpert page which shows the 2 entried from capquest and from CITI?

be a lot easier to understand if you print this out and send it to us as a pdf scan. the cra file dump above]

 

as for the missing data

 

you need to write to the

person that sent the sar return

and ak where the data is on the earlier loan

it is missing

 

as for the muppets chasing the debt

 

they can wait.

dx

 

 

dx

Link to post
Share on other sites

yea page 35 stuff etc

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi dx!

 

I wrote to the person at capquest that sent the SAR and asked for the documentation relating to the original loan that had been refinanced and

 

they have replied including yet another copy of the more recent loan agreement (which shows the refinancing of the original loan)

but no paperwork regarding the original loan as asked for in my recent letter, just wondering next steps? cheers dx

 

 

be a lot easier to understand if you print this out and send it to us as a pdf scan. the cra file dump above]

 

as for the missing data

 

you need to write to the

person that sent the sar return

and ak where the data is on the earlier loan

it is missing

 

as for the muppets chasing the debt

 

they can wait.

dx

 

 

dx

Link to post
Share on other sites

why did you write to crapest when you sent your sar to citi?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hI DX! Capquest have replied and included yet another copy of the most recent agreement, again nothing referring ot the earlier refinanced loan, just wondering what my next steps are?

cheers!

be a lot easier to understand if you print this out and send it to us as a pdf scan. the cra file dump above]

 

as for the missing data

 

you need to write to the

person that sent the sar return

and ak where the data is on the earlier loan

it is missing

 

as for the muppets chasing the debt

 

they can wait.

dx

 

 

dx

Link to post
Share on other sites

????

 

why did you write to crapest regarding the missing agreement not in the SAR?

you should be writing to the CITI address thatreturned the SAR with it missing

 

WHERE IS IT please Mr CITI

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

lets see it please and ALL the statements for both loans

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...