Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PPI repayment offset against outstanding debt question


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4615 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

As anyone on here been offered a PPI refund by cheque even though they still have an outstanding debt with that particular creditor and if so what did you say to your lender to persuade them not to offset against the outstanding debt?

 

Did you use the hardship plea?

 

I know the lender can offset a PPI refund any debt outstanding but I'm sure some would take pity on someone in poverty etc

 

Thanks anyway

Link to post
Share on other sites

stalin Hi doubt it very much sorry.Give you some idea I accepted the PPI from a credit card company starts with B..........D but put on the acceptance form that I was happy if they applied the interest to the account and the balance to me as the PPI payments I had made where by their own admission mis-sold and not there property,and further if they did not agree with this my acceptance of the mis-sold PPI refund was Void the B......D took the lot and have now applied interest on the small amount outstanding after 3 years of agreed frozen interest

 

 

FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi SD,

 

LTSB refunded two lots of PPI in the form of personal cheques on two separate loan accounts both of which were in default and in the hands of (but not sold to) DCAs. This was during 2010. Both complaints went through the FOS and in one email to me the FOS said that it was LTSB's intention to refund as a personal cheque - I wasn't going to argue with this, lol, being in need of that money at the time. When the refund was due on the second account the FOS said that Lloyds intended to offset it against the debt, so I reminded them that in the other account they had sent me a cheque. The adjudicator went back to LTSB with this and the result was that they agreed to do the same on the second account.

 

I also received cheque refunds on two MBNA credit card accounts which had outstanding balances (again in default) but the difference here was that these had been sold on to DCAs. In the case of both these accounts despite the FOS adjudicators warning me that the OC (MBNA) was within their rights to (and most likely would) send the refund to the DCA, this didn't happen and instead the cheques came to me.

 

On none of these occasions did I mention hardship.

 

I don't know if this was just luck, but that's my experience!

 

Wishing you well with this,

 

Landy x

LTSB PPI on various loans (current/settled) - Refunded inc 8%

 

MBNA 1 Charges - Refunded inc CI

 

MBNA 1 PPI - Refunded

 

MBNA 2 Charges - Refunded inc 8%

 

MBNA 2 PPI - Refunded

 

MBNA 2 Accident Ins - Refunded

 

Swift Advances (settled) Mortgage Charges -Partially refunded

 

Swift Advances (settled) Mortgage PPI - Refunded inc CI & 8%

 

Sainsburys (settled) Loan PPI - Refunded inc CI +8%

 

Sainsburys (closed) Card Charges - Refunded inc CI + 8%

 

M&S Money (closed) Card Charges - Refunded inc CI

 

M&S Money (closed) Card PPI - Refunded inc 8%

 

Direct Line (settled) Loan PPI - Refunded inc CI + 8%

 

Debenhams Card (closed) PPI - Refunded inc 8%

 

Swift Mortgage Charges -Refunded

 

Hitachi Finance (closed) Charges - Refunded

Link to post
Share on other sites

they can only use offset against notified arrears, not the full outstanding balance.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi FS,

 

That's ok - maybe I was the exception to the rule :-)

 

All the best,

 

Landy x

LTSB PPI on various loans (current/settled) - Refunded inc 8%

 

MBNA 1 Charges - Refunded inc CI

 

MBNA 1 PPI - Refunded

 

MBNA 2 Charges - Refunded inc 8%

 

MBNA 2 PPI - Refunded

 

MBNA 2 Accident Ins - Refunded

 

Swift Advances (settled) Mortgage Charges -Partially refunded

 

Swift Advances (settled) Mortgage PPI - Refunded inc CI & 8%

 

Sainsburys (settled) Loan PPI - Refunded inc CI +8%

 

Sainsburys (closed) Card Charges - Refunded inc CI + 8%

 

M&S Money (closed) Card Charges - Refunded inc CI

 

M&S Money (closed) Card PPI - Refunded inc 8%

 

Direct Line (settled) Loan PPI - Refunded inc CI + 8%

 

Debenhams Card (closed) PPI - Refunded inc 8%

 

Swift Mortgage Charges -Refunded

 

Hitachi Finance (closed) Charges - Refunded

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...
they can only use offset against notified arrears, not the full outstanding balance.

 

dx

 

sorry to hijack here , is there any more info you point me to, has regards to rules , has i dont want rbs to offset my ppi settelment against disputed credit card debts with in the group,thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry to hijack here , is there any more info you point me to, has regards to rules , has i dont want rbs to offset my ppi settelment against disputed credit card debts with in the group,thanks

 

This could be a starting point for you

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/ombudsman-news/40/40_setoff.htm

 

Regards

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This could be a starting point for you

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/ombudsman-news/40/40_setoff.htm

 

Regards

 

ims

thanks for quick reply, appreciated, do you think if i write back rejecting their terms of seettlement letter , stating that the creditcard debt held with in rbs group(mint) is in dispute, can they or will they try and pay all of 3k plus settlement in to this debt account?

Link to post
Share on other sites

over cca , reconsituted etc, greens solicitors have backed off and closed there input after just one replied letter to them from me ,who were acting behalf of tridant who are chasing for rbs (mint) once given affidavit and confirmation under cuputr 2008 of original paperwork held by mint, payments suspended for 6 mths now , until they are proividing me with the confirmatioin i ask for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the basis is the OP is says a recon is not enforceable, however, and correctly, OC are saying it is.

 

there is a clear financial 'link'

 

and yes if there are arrears, i bet they will offset.

pers i'd keep quiet!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Tricky one.

 

As has been said, normally they can only set off against arrears. In this case if they wanted to push I believe that a recon agreement would suffice for a court, coupled with financial link

 

 

What about charges on the mint card that can be reclaimed...are there any?

 

Regards

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the basis is the OP is says a recon is not enforceable, however, and correctly, OC are saying it is.

 

there is a clear financial 'link'

 

and yes if there are arrears, i bet they will offset.

pers i'd keep quiet!

 

dx

thanks for reply, the acceptence ppi letter you have to sign to claim your settlement refund, i would like to think (wishful thinking i know) that they might be not be aware that i have disputed credit card debt and pay me directly by cheque without offsetting anyway,so the dilema is for me, dont sign anything yet , write back with my terms that want payment direct to me and for them not to offset on debts,

which brings me to the other dilema off highlighting and making them aware of the debt to them within the group?

 

also if i understand correctly,it would be the arrears only that would be offset and not my full refund that would go in to my cc debt ,(is that correct)?

has this is six months only into statuted barred, would rbs paying the arrears make the clock revert back to starting all over again if you understand what i am trying to say

 

do i sign accept and keep quiet and see what happens?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Tricky one.

 

As has been said, normally they can only set off against arrears. In this case if they wanted to push I believe that a recon agreement would suffice for a court, coupled with financial link

 

 

What about charges on the mint card that can be reclaimed...are there any?

 

Regards

 

ims

very few charges on this account i am afraid on this one .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
As anyone on here been offered a PPI refund by cheque even though they still have an outstanding debt with that particular creditor and if so what did you say to your lender to persuade them not to offset against the outstanding debt?

 

Did you use the hardship plea?

 

I know the lender can offset a PPI refund any debt outstanding but I'm sure some would take pity on someone in poverty etc

 

Thanks anyway

 

Not got to the settlement stage yet, but I wondered if a better arguement would be on the grounds you have other outstanding debt and that had you not had to pay the PPI that money would have been split between your debtors. Therefore the money should go to you to be split prorata between any debtors?

 

Perhaps go in with an all barrels blazing approach that hardship applies plus in dispute and finally the fact that other debts exists?

 

This might sit better with the FOS and covers all angles.

Think you have a much better chance against DCA's rather than the original creditor.

 

Ali x

Btw I am no expert just give notes based on what I have read on here and other forums/sites, plus my own experiences and investigations.

 

All ccj's now dropped off file, 2 yrs to go to clear file.

All old debts either settled or made unenforcable.

 

RBS MPP-Full offer at 8 wks from first complaint

RBS Overdraft loanguard-full offer at 8 wks from complaint

Citicard ppi-with FOS finally paid 8 months after offer through FOS!

Capital one x2- with FOS

Monument ppi-with FOS

aqua x2 ppi-partialled settled still pushing for the rest

Black horse ppi-offers made and accepted except for one early loan they say no info held-still pushing for payment

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
thanks for reply, the acceptence ppi letter you have to sign to claim your settlement refund, i would like to think (wishful thinking i know) that they might be not be aware that i have disputed credit card debt and pay me directly by cheque without offsetting anyway,so the dilema is for me, dont sign anything yet , write back with my terms that want payment direct to me and for them not to offset on debts,

which brings me to the other dilema off highlighting and making them aware of the debt to them within the group?

 

also if i understand correctly,it would be the arrears only that would be offset and not my full refund that would go in to my cc debt ,(is that correct)?

has this is six months only into statuted barred, would rbs paying the arrears make the clock revert back to starting all over again if you understand what i am trying to say

 

do i sign accept and keep quiet and see what happens?

Update, I have received in full 3 .6k cheque, they did not offset against my cc debt, result me thinks,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...