Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Alliance & Leicester - preliminary e-mail sent


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6620 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have started pestering A&L, to repay £50 bank charges they took last year.

 

(I know £50 is not much but I have been through my statements for 4 bank accounts & 2 cards and all in all the charges add up to £410 so I plan to try and get them all back!).

 

Sent them an e-mail yesterday evening (28th March) as follows:

 

 

 

“I have been reviewing my bank statements online and am disappointed to note that you have levied two charges against my account, relating to the same period. The first went out on 16th September 2005 in the sum of £25 and the second charge of £25 left my account on 24th October 2005. I believe that £50 is not a true reflection of your costs and is punitive in nature. I understand that such charges are unlawful at Common Law, Statute and recent Consumer regulations and am writing to ask that these be refunded as soon as is practicable. The £50 will of course go some way to paying off my current authorised overdraft.

 

I look forward to hearing from you within 14 days, letting me know a date by which I will receive payment. If I do not hear from you I will take further action to recover these fees.”

 

 

 

 

 

Received a standard reply at 4:30am 29th March

 

 

 

 

 

“Thank you for your e-mail

Having checked your account. I can confirm that the charges you are referring to have been raised correctly on your account.

 

The charges fall in line with our charging tariff. Which is stated clearly both in the terms and conditions of your account and on the reverse of your monthly Premier account statement.

 

 

Regards,

Alliance & Leicester Plc”

 

 

 

 

 

I sent them a further e-mail today:

 

 

 

 

“Thank you for your prompt reply.

 

I hope that you will enter into a sincere dialogue with me about this matter and I am writing to you on the assumption that you will prefer to do this than merely respond with standard letters.

 

It is my opinion, and that of the Office of Fair Trading (OFT), that these charges are punitive in nature, not a genuine pre-estimate of cost and not intended to reimburse your losses for a breach of contract occurring. Further to the 1999 Consumer Credit Regulations quoted by the OFT, there are numerous cases in law that prove that punitive charges in contracts are unenforceable at English law.

 

Murray v Leisureplay (2004)

Dunlop Tyre Company v New Garage and Motor Co. (1915)

Bridge v. Campbell Discount Co. Ltd. (1962)

 

Further to these cases, I also believe these charges to be a direct breach of the Unfair Contracts Terms Act 1977 which require that contract terms be reasonable. I do not believe these charges are reasonable as outlined in the aforementioned Act.

 

With this in mind, I respectfully request that you return to me the charges made on this account within 14 days of receipt of my e-mail of 28th March (i.e. 11th April 2006). If you choose not to do so, I will start proceedings for recovery in the County Courts, as I believe that legally I am entitled to this money back. By doing so, you will be liable for our court costs and for an extra 8% APR as allowed by the County Courts Act (1984). This money would be used in some way to clear my overdraft on this account.”

 

 

 

 

 

No reply yet. If they don’t reply before 11th April I will send them the Letter Before Action.

 

Just wanted to thank you for setting up this site & thank everyone (in advance) for their support.

 

Penny-Wise

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes they are just delaying , you just set the pace and stick to your time limits

When you want to fool the world, tell the truth. :D

Advice & opinions of Janet-M are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any

doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, have you got a contact email address for A&L they have levied over £200 in charges against my account since december various £25's...

 

Also if i were to ask for me my money back which i am, do i just request my money from my own devised letter (email) or use the prelim letter from the library...

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If everyone uses the same letter in the library then i think we will have more luck and the banks will know there we are a group force, as it were

If you find this post useful, please click the Scales of 'Justice' in the top right corner. Thanks ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I use their internet banking and so just logged on and went to the ‘contact us’ bit. It’s probably best to do it this way then you don’t have to put your personal details in an e-mail?

 

Took me a while to actually find out how to e-mail them so I’ll post it.

 

Type your e-mail.

 

Log in to internet banking.

 

Click on ‘help’ at the top right of the page

 

Click on ‘view accounts’

 

Click on ‘contact details’

 

Click on ‘other ways to contact us’

 

Click on ‘send us an e-mail’

 

Then paste in your e-mail that you typed before. If you type it into the box it you will be timed out and will lose your e-mail :-(

 

Hope that helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

No reply as yet from Customer Services. :-(

 

Sending off LBA today:

 

 

 

I now understand that the regime of 'fees' which you have been applying to my account in relation to direct debit refusals, exceeding overdraft limits and so forth are unlawful at Common Law, Statute and recent Consumer regulations.

 

I would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that I opened my account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with UK law.

 

I am frankly shocked that you have operated my account in this way as I had always reposed confidence in your integrity and expertise as my fiduciary.

 

I calculate that you have taken £50 and require repayment in full of this money. If you do not comply fully within 14 days then I shall begin a claim against you for the full amount plus interest plus my costs and without further notice.

 

 

 

Will be scrutinising all docs in the library and will know everything as well as the back of my hand well before the next two weeks are up (26th April).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Yep well i received my letter back from Alliance & Leicester stating they will not refund me as there charges are quite clearly shown?

 

They have said i can take if further if i wish, to the financial ombudsman.

Furthermore i will be sending the Letter before action today.

 

As they have since my last post incurred more charges on my account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/07/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6620 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...