Jump to content


Can a council issue a statutory demand in respect of unpaid PCNs?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5093 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can a council issue a statutory demand in respect of numerous unpaid Penalty charge notices? PCNs do not generate CCJs.

 

Say where a person has accrued say 20 or more worth a few grand and the bailiffs can't get anything could they issue a SD and make a person bankrupt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome,

 

I'll move this thread to the appropriate Forum.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can a council issue a statutory demand in respect of numerous unpaid Penalty charge notices? PCNs do not generate CCJs.

 

Say where a person has accrued say 20 or more worth a few grand and the bailiffs can't get anything could they issue a SD and make a person bankrupt?

 

Watching with interest as surely under such circumstances the council would have to comply with a higher standard of proof , rather than their minions just saying it is so . I was once threatened with being chased in a civil court for a Ccj for an unpaid pcn , which i would have welcomed as the council would have had to prove it , But as it was over the phone I think it was a bullies bluff to scare me into paying , would love to know the answer to this one , can the councils change juristiction when it suits them ?

Edited by noddyaccount
Link to post
Share on other sites

A Council can use alternative methods of collection should a person not be able to pay. These powers are not widely used but can include :

1 - Attachment to earnings

2 - An order which stops people using their bank accounts until the debt is paid

3 - A type of Charging Order on your property

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Council can use alternative methods of collection should a person not be able to pay. These powers are not widely used but can include :

1 - Attachment to earnings

2 - An order which stops people using their bank accounts until the debt is paid

3 - A type of Charging Order on your property

 

Are you sure this relates to parking matters , rather than unpaid council tax , etc etc . Where are the rules relating to this RTA 1991 ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No the Council cannot. They never had a county court judgment which is the minimum requirement to be able ask for the court for any of the three listed above plus bankruptcy.

 

The standard of proof councils have to achieve for PCNs is merely a belief that a person owes money and that this belief was accepted by their own funded admin unit known as the Traffic Enforcement Centre which does not have the power to refuse authorisation of a warrant of execution. No county court has been involved.

 

This is way short of a county court requirement to obtain a judgment after a summons has been issued, defended but subsequently proved in open court where a judge will decide on 'the balance of probabilities'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fair-Parking,

 

Part 75 of the Rules & Practice Directions part of the Civil Procedure Rules which apply to the TEC appear to suggest otherwise.

 

PART 75 - TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT - Ministry of Justice

********************************************

Nothing in this post constitutes "advice" which I may not, in any event, be qualified to provide.

The only interpretation permitted on this post (or any others I may have made) is that this is what I would personally consider doing in the circumstances discussed. Each and every reader of this post or any other I may have made must take responsibility for forming their own view and making their own decision.

I receive an unwieldy number of private messages. I am happy to respond to messages posted on open forum but am unable to respond to private messages, seeking advice, when the substance of that message should properly be on the open forum.

Many thanks for your assistance and understanding on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Part 75 may invite applications but as parts 71,72, 73 and CCR order 27 clearly state such measures apply only to judgment creditors. There are no judgment creditors in civil parking as judgments can only be obtained from county and high courts and usually after authentic trials.

 

The TEC cannot issue judgments and thus there are no creditors, only those who believe that money is owed to them via unproven allegations of parking or minor traffic contraventions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But what if the matter had been transferred to another county court for enforcement under 75.9

********************************************

Nothing in this post constitutes "advice" which I may not, in any event, be qualified to provide.

The only interpretation permitted on this post (or any others I may have made) is that this is what I would personally consider doing in the circumstances discussed. Each and every reader of this post or any other I may have made must take responsibility for forming their own view and making their own decision.

I receive an unwieldy number of private messages. I am happy to respond to messages posted on open forum but am unable to respond to private messages, seeking advice, when the substance of that message should properly be on the open forum.

Many thanks for your assistance and understanding on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another county court? Which was the first one?

 

That'll be Northampton County Court of which office the TEC is deemed to be part under 75.2 (2) (a)

********************************************

Nothing in this post constitutes "advice" which I may not, in any event, be qualified to provide.

The only interpretation permitted on this post (or any others I may have made) is that this is what I would personally consider doing in the circumstances discussed. Each and every reader of this post or any other I may have made must take responsibility for forming their own view and making their own decision.

I receive an unwieldy number of private messages. I am happy to respond to messages posted on open forum but am unable to respond to private messages, seeking advice, when the substance of that message should properly be on the open forum.

Many thanks for your assistance and understanding on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No mention of Northampton County Court inder 75.2. Northampton County Court is separate from the TEC who until a few weeks ago had a answer mesaage which informed all callers NOT to contact Northampton County Court for parking 'as they cannot help you'. The latest message now doesn't say that, but it does refer to decriminlaised contraventions as an 'offence'.

 

The helpdesk at Northampton County Court will tell you that Northampton County Court is separate from the TEC and that you cannot receive a county court judgment for parking which you must have for attachment of earnings, charging orders, garnishees, oral exams and bankruptcies to be made against you

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess they haven't read 2.1 of Practice Direction 75 which says:

All claims to which Part 75 applies must be started in the Traffic Enforcement Centre (‘the Centre’) at Northampton County Court.

PRACTICE DIRECTION 75 – TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT - Ministry of Justice

IME there is nothing unusual in the Public Sector (or private for that matter) of finding people who don't know their ar$e from their elbow!

********************************************

Nothing in this post constitutes "advice" which I may not, in any event, be qualified to provide.

The only interpretation permitted on this post (or any others I may have made) is that this is what I would personally consider doing in the circumstances discussed. Each and every reader of this post or any other I may have made must take responsibility for forming their own view and making their own decision.

I receive an unwieldy number of private messages. I am happy to respond to messages posted on open forum but am unable to respond to private messages, seeking advice, when the substance of that message should properly be on the open forum.

Many thanks for your assistance and understanding on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once an OfR has been filed try asking for discovery under CPR part 31. Part 75 action clearly is a claim after all and its not small claims. :) And the TEC is not deemed to be a court, it is "the Centre is deemed to be part of the office of the court". i.e. Office admin, a place where papers are filed or even just a part of the building. Notice its 'office' not 'Office'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...