Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Sheriff puts Bank of Scotland to proof on bank charges


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4126 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Well, what do the regulations define as a 'consumer association'? If it is a wide definition of a group of consumers who have agreed to bound by certain terms & conditions to further consumer aims, it may well be that CAG does qualify as a 'consumer association'.

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately I can't help who is considered to be the "Official" consumers association lol

My point is, make makes Which? the official one? Aren't they just one of many? Sure they've been around a long time and may even be the best known but who decides who the official UK Consumer Association is? Are they a Charity or for-profit entity?

 

Just asking really....

The matrix is intrinsically flawed. Within it is the program for it's own destruction. If you are reading this, you are in the matrix and it's days are numbered...so watch out! :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think ANY "consumer association" could do this i.e CAG, MSE etc.

 

Surely "a consumer association" is simply just an "association of consumers" - so any such association (even a buying group) should be able to make such a complaint?

 

Instead of debating this excellent piece of intelligence ad nauseam on here, why can we not simply ask the question and seek clarity of what is meant by "consumer association"?

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

The important thing is not to lose sight of the power of the idea. I suspect that pretty much ANY reasonably sized association of consumers should be sufficient to initiate the complaint referred to in the Regs as pointed out by rdm2006.

 

Of course, it's not a waste of time to ask the OFT to clarify what they mean and ask them to name a few organisations that qualifies in their view.

The matrix is intrinsically flawed. Within it is the program for it's own destruction. If you are reading this, you are in the matrix and it's days are numbered...so watch out! :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Totally agree with Rebel and BTM.

 

However the REAL BIG QUESTION is - Can we ask OFT a question that will be answered unambiguously, fully and correctly in our life time?

 

Their track record (along with FOS, FSA etc.) in dealing with the Banks is hardly enouraging!

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do OFT regulate who is or is not a consumer association?

 

Rebel11 - should this be moved to a separate thread?

 

 

and to hell with it - lets get CAB and Consumer Focus to join in too

Edited by rdm2006
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we're getting very hung up on this. Does anyone have an e-mail address for OFT - so we can get an answer as to what was meant?

 

I am sure ANY association of consumers could make the complaint. I can believe they meant Which? to have a monopoly on this.

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

John Fingleton, OFT Chief Executive, Just mark it for his attention. Just a note, these are my personal thoughts.

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/contactus;jsessionid=82E56D119BBB40087A6A5D19293C8080#named3

 

 

 

I think we're getting very hung up on this. Does anyone have an e-mail address for OFT - so we can get an answer as to what was meant?

 

I am sure ANY association of consumers could make the complaint. I can believe they meant Which? to have a monopoly on this.

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Under the Enterprise Act 2002 only designated consumer bodies can make 'super complaints' to the OFT. These currently include Which?, CAMRA, CAB, Consumer Direct and the National Consumer Council.

 

Only consumer bodies designated by the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (Section 11(5)) can make a super-complaint.

 

Notwithstanding it would be utterly pointless any designated consumer group asking the OFT to investigate bank charges because they already have and failed. Remember?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OFT failed on a VERY NARROW point of Law - as the SC Judges were at pains to stress (unusually) when they said they were NOT there to rule on the fairness of bank charges - only that very narrow point of law which the Banks had trapped OFT into fighting on its own.

 

The main fight continues - as this thread shows. Not exploiting any other avenue is just defeatist.

 

I notice that, apart from CAMRA, the organisations you mention are about as useless as OFT, FOS and FSA - which will suit our old Etonian coalition Government down to the ground!

 

I also thought CAG (or The Consumer Forums) had recently made a super complaint - not certain and can't remember result - if finished). If I'm wrong then CAG should certainly seek such designation as it's a lot more effective than all the others mentioned put together!

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bigdebtor,

 

'Where theres a will theres a way', just as an example 'Poll Tax', what happened to it? It just takes people power, there were over a million people whose cases were frozen

awaiting the SC Judgement. That is a lot of people.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rebel

 

I agree. Hopefully GLC will win the day and then the flood gates will be opened! The Bankers shouldn't be in a rush to spend their £7 billion bonuses as it could all be needed to repay what they've robbed from us!

 

BTW can you confirm if CAG did make a "super complaint" some time last year - or is my memory failing me again? :sad:

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

I heard the figure was likely to exceed 1 million - since many people had not done anything - just awaiting developments. Also many were just fighting one battle - but had several other accounts to fight for if the first was successful.

 

As I said, Mr Banker - don't spend your £7 billion just yet!

 

BD

 

PS - does "enaid" stand for "everyone needs an incorrigible doubter"? :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • The Campaign for Real Ale Limited (CAMRA)
  • The Consumer Council for Water
  • The Consumers' Association (trading as "Which?")
  • The General Consumer Council for Northern Ireland (GCCNI)
  • National Association of Citizens Advice Bureaux (NACAB)
  • The National Consumer Council (trading as "Consumer Focus")
  • The Scottish Association of Citizens Advice Bureaux (trading as Citizens Advice Scotland (CAS))

 

http://www.bis.gov.uk/policies/consumer-issues/enforcement-of-consumer-law/super-complaints

Link to post
Share on other sites

the first plus consumer group put a super complaint in which was accepted despite not having designated status

 

http://www.firstpluscomplaints.co.uk/the-news.html

 

 

I'm not sure what you are supercomplaining about though to be honest - the reciprocal right to charge for letters / late payments ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was right. Consumer Forums DID submit a super complaint last year. See below.

 

Also if you google "Super Complaints Consumer Forums" it's VERY interesting how much recent activity there has been by other forums in recent months!

 

BD

 

I Barclays FirstPlus Super Complaint

neilsbox_chart.gif Thread Stats

neilsbox_eyes.gif Views:

689

 

 

Wmouth.pngW Factor

Coming Soon...

 

 

Share This Thread:

facebook_share.jpg

tweet.jpg

 

 

 

The Consumer Action Group FirstPlus Complaints have last week submitted a Super Complaint to the Office of Fair Trading in relation to breaches of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contract Regulations due to their failure to pass on any of the base rate / FHBR reductions to their secured loan customers.

 

The OFT have agreed to consider it even though we haven't been given designated body status.

 

Edit - Download link removed - it can be viewed via the FirstPlus Complaints forum.

 

Anyone wanting to know more can join us at www.firstpluscomplaints.co.uk

Link to post
Share on other sites

All you need to do is get CAG, LB, Moneysaving etc to band together, you'd have at least 1m people that they could represent. It's simple.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

 

I think Martin considered it before (but I can't find a reference for that)

 

The guidance for applying to be a designated body is on the BIS site - http://www.bis.gov.uk/files/file50334.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

the first plus consumer group put a super complaint in which was accepted despite not having designated status

 

http://www.firstpluscomplaints.co.uk/the-news.html

 

 

I'm not sure what you are supercomplaining about though to be honest - the reciprocal right to charge for letters / late payments ?

 

I was in the process of posting the same thing - but to answer your question YES - WE should also have the right to charge them late payment charges for them taking 4 days to show a cheque as cleared funds - or when they screw up credits or DD/SO mandates etc (quite frequent with SO mandates before you ask), the right to charge them £39 when we have to write to them to tell them of THEIR mistakes etc. etc.

 

However the KEY thing is that THEY should NOT have a right which is not reciprocated.

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

the first plus consumer group put a super complaint in which was accepted despite not having designated status

 

http://www.firstpluscomplaints.co.uk/the-news.html

 

 

I'm not sure what you are supercomplaining about though to be honest - the reciprocal right to charge for letters / late payments ?

 

I am complaining about a term in my contract which has allowed the bank to charge me £1,270.00 over 12 months when it made an error - ok, I got that back, but we had suffered for 12 months and were offered only £100.00 as compensation for the error. (insult to injury are words that spring to mind)

 

And even then it took them 6 months of denial before i got it back - when they were holding the paperwork which proved it was their fault all along.

 

on top of that i had to remortgage my home to pay off a debt (Overdraft) that would not have existed had they not made an error.....

 

my home has been repossessed (fortunately under the Mortgage Rescue Scheme)

 

Do I sound P'd off at all?

 

Im sure if cag (and others) got together with which it could be done

Edited by rdm2006
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...