Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

If it wasn't serious, I'd laugh


Maddaddy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5229 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I'll try and make this short + sweet

 

This is how things stand as I write

 

CSA I'm paying arrears at £250 per month(csa want arrears paid within 2 years)

 

Daughter Student carrying ex-wifes banner sued me for maintenance £150 per month whilst receiving full bursary (£250 per month) Her parental(home) contribution = £0 per year

 

Step daughter Student receives bursary £100 per month and works part time (we cant afford to support her) Her parental (home) contribution = £400 per year

 

Students Award Agency Scotland (SAAS) Say daughter can receive only £1067 per year(£20.50 per week) "unearned income" then bursary is reduced £ for £

 

My lawyer :confused: says set up DD to pay daughter £20 per week and see how it goes

 

Sherrif Officer After paying £1098 in November for last years maintenance has approached with Charge for Payment for £500 for November till now

 

Help/Advice needed....We are not struggling financially yet but.....

 

My local MP has also been involved (His team found the SAAS cap thingy) and suggests Negligence on "My Lawyers" part

 

SAAS Capped maintenance might help others on site

 

Cheers

Edited by Maddaddy
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Very difficult to say but I think these matters are all income based, so, if you have income and your former wife does not then that explains why you need to contribute for your step daughter but your former wife does not.

 

I’ve always thought it a little strange that affordability does not play a greater role in these matters. Let’s say you take home £30K but you then pay £15K to maintain your home (mortgage, council tax, heating repairs etc) a further £5K goes in groceries, £5K to keep a car (payments, fuel, insurance, road tax) which is essential to get you to work and £5K towards your step daughter anyone can see that there is nothing left. However, I bet that the payment is based on your gross wage say £40K and that the aforementioned outlays are ignored!

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Coactum,

 

As you have guessed....The payments are all related to income.

 

The CSA refuse to budge on their repayment although I had absolutely no say in the "discussed repayment" (they say they can double it if required)

 

The SAAS calculate my step daughters bursary on my household income and my daughters on my ex's

 

The lawyers base their deal on CSA figures for children

 

Note: If my maintenance payment to daughter was regarded as "parental support" she would receive NO bursary (equivilant to home income of £34000pa (I am well..well below that))

 

If I add CSA and maintenance figures together I pay FOUR Times the figure I would expect to pay for 1 child

 

and as you say....I have to live and work and travel

 

BUT....Light at the end of the tunnel

 

IN SEPTEMBER I AM RID OF CSA (might even pay the buggers off early ;-) )

 

All I ever asked for was "both students to be treated equally"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...