Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Council Tax, 10% late payment charge! is this legal?


lomondrock
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5213 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Looking for a wee bit of advice.

 

Council Tax, 10% late payment charge! is this legal?

 

I have read some of the posts on Council Tax, but looking for some advice.

 

Can the Council (in Scotland) apply a charge of 10% of the value of the Council tax for late payment?

 

Surely this is not a fair charge as there is already a £50 levy applied to every Council Tax bill to cover people who do not pay.

 

Any advice welcomed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This does sound unusual and also excessive. I don't know if the council is protected in some way from the usual rules relating to the kind of thing.

 

I think that I owuld start off by challenging this to the Local Authority Ombudsman.

Also, contact Govan Law Centre about this as they are in Scotland and will know the rules very well and will also be very concerned to hear your story

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

As previous answer, phone Council Office, they can "recall" charge

I receive these 2-3 times a year (although my CT is always paid in full by December 2 MONTHS EARLY ) because payments are a few pence out, you are required to pay all outstanding + 10% (so says the letter)

Phone them :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

10% surcharge is cahrged when non payment of council tax occurs and has to be forward to a summary judgement then sent to sheriff officers for enforcement -

 

 

there is no £50 levy?????

 

the 10 % is applied to cover socts of the summary judgement and and SO fees

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

As Ida says - the 10% Statutory Charge is legal, and had been an element of the late payment charges since the days before and following the Community Charge (Poll Tax), whether it is 'fair' or not is irrelevant - it is the law of the land.

 

I've never come acrross this £50 levy you talk of. Which Council area are you in?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Don’t get me started on Councils! As Busby & Ida have said this in commonplace in Scotland, worse still be wary if there is an outstanding balance at the end of the year because some local Authorities always take your most recent payment and apply this to your oldest outstanding debt. So, whilst you think you are paying this years bill and arguing that 10% addition from last year they in effect accept your money, pay towards last year and run this year into arrears and adding.... you got it 10% to this years bill!

 

What has always bugged me is that the council get a summary warrant without you ever getting the change to go to court and defend the matter.

 

I’ve known people who were getting a rebate then the council rescinded it placing a demand and the next day adding the 10%. That really was adding insult to injury.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...