Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CSA Problems


Melbel
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5287 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I was wondering if i could get some advice on the following...

 

My friends boyfriend is having a big run of bad luck at the moment, i will try and list the situation.

 

He has a 12year old child he hasnt seen for approx 3 years because the mum moved away and left no forwarding address, now shes back she still wont let him see his child.

When he had contact with the child - he paid the mother cash toward the upkeep but hasnt since she moved.

 

Fast forward 3 years to now - he has been working in a job that basically uses him as and when. He's recently been laid off and robably due back in January therefore he has made a claim for jobseekers allowance.

 

He is in a situation at the moment that he has nowhere to live so flits between his mums, his dads and a group of friends.

 

He made his jobseekers claim mid Nov and they still havent sorted it. They are saying his problem is no fixed abode even though he has given his mums address for any correspondence.

 

Meanwhile the CSA have written to him at his dads, then his mums basically asking for all details of what he has been doing since march 2000. incoming outgoing money, benefits claimed, any mortgaages - the lot. They are saying if he does not provide this they will chase him for £53,000!!!

 

He has no idea why they are going back to march 2000 for money when he was in contact with his child and how can they enforce a debt that they have made up or estimated.

 

Where does he stand with the letter theyve sent him - is it legally enforcable and what are the implications?

 

Do they have any right to just take what money they want off him?

 

Also why should this affect him claiming jobseekers while he is out of work?

 

it all seems very unfair.

 

Any advice appreciated...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Melbel

 

I don't know much about the CSA but I think they seem to change the rules to suit themselves.

 

My brother had been paying cash every week to his Ex. He paid every Friday when he picked the kids up to stay with him every weekend. This was every weekend for nearly 3 years. He bought all their clothes, shoes and paid for things for school etc and took them on holiday every year. His Ex decided to get the CSA involved as someone told her she could get more money. His EX told the CSA that he has never paid a penny! :eek:

 

The CSA then did an attachment of earnings for the amount they decided he should pay aswell as an additional amount towards three years back pay. My brother is really struggling to pay as it is a lot of money they take off him. He has since lost his job and works now and again on agency work, not regular at all. The CSA have refused to reduce his payments.

 

My sister on the other hand put in a claim with the CSA after her husband left and heared nothing from them. After 6 months she got back in touch with them and was told she was in a queue, they were very busy and would deal with her claim when they could. They had his address and place of work. 1 1/2 years later they have wrote to her saying they do not claim back pay and her claim will start when they make contact with the father.

 

They finally got in touch with him 2 months ago. He has a nice flat, just bought a new car and goes out drinking everynight and has a full time job. They have wrote to my sister saying he can only afford £5 in total per week (that is for 3 children) and they will arrange for the payments to go into her account.:mad:

 

I just cannot see how the rules are different for each case.

 

I hope someone who understands the system can come and help you. I think that probably your friends, boyfriends Ex has not been completly truthfull with her claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Wino

 

Thanks for replying - it seems the CSA cause problems for both sides..

 

The thing is, he is now to scared to reply to them incase they take stupid amounts from his wage (when he goes back to work)

 

I said it would be better for him to face it and fight whatever is wrong but it seems the CSA (from what ive read online) get away with all sorts..

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to know whether claims can be back dated to when the couple first split or until a claim is actually made or when the Father /Mother is tracked down?

 

There seems to be different rules:confused:

 

£53,000 is a lot I wonder how many years this is for?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The claim can only be backdated to the date of the maintenence enquiry form. (MEF)

 

If they are not provided with information to correctly calculate the maintenance, they will apply a rate based on the number of children that maintenance needs to be paid for. (This is known as a "default maintenance decision), and would apply from the date of the MEF. The default rate is £30 per week for one child, £40 per week for two children and £50 per week for three or more children. These amounts are total amounts, not per child.

 

If he doesn't provide them with information, they may go to court to obtain a liability order to "force" payment.

 

Whilst he is receiving benefit, they can only take £5 per week from his benefit.

 

If he can prove the payments he has made to his ex, they should adjust the calculation for that period. He should also tell them of times when the child stayed overnight - this can reduce the amount payable.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning

 

We have no idea why the claim goes back to 2000. He was seeing his son reguarly then and paying maintenance. Unfortunately it was cash so theres no proof - he is kicking himself now.

 

Shes trying to say he hasnt seen his son since 2000 i think. This is lies - his son was even a pageboy at his aunts wedding in 2004, this can be proved. Contact went on until 2006 ish until the mum moved to a different area.

 

On the benefits thing - this case has held that up - they wont give him any JSA due to this CSA problem. Hes going back to the jobcentre today to try and sort it.

 

So would it be best that he fills this form in ?

 

The only problem is they want details of all jobs (which he doesnt have all details to) he has had

 

all addresses hes lived at, all rent (and proof of)

 

all incoming and outgoings since 2000

 

the lot.. its ridiculous - he hasnt got all of this info as it was a long time ago plus he was paying for his son then.

 

Its a right mess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...