Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

ABBEY refuses hardship claim


sandraroff
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5332 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i have been helping a friend claim back from abbey. this claim has been ongoing for about three years now!!!

 

in the last few months, she applied to abbey nder the hardship rues and they have turned her down flat.

 

their argument is that because in the last year she hasnt incurred any further charges (so good for her for running the account properly after the spend thrift husband went), her hard ship problems havent been brought about by their charges!!!!

 

also, right from the start, they left out several years copy statements and we have asked for them time and time again, but we STILL havent received them, they seem to be ignoring the request completely.

 

firstly, can they refuse thehardship claim on teh grounds they say?? i know they are a law unto themselves. and she is in serious hardship;

 

secondly, just how on earth do we get them to send the missing several years statements?? any charges on the missing statements are obviously not included in the claims made so far. i have pointed that out to abbey on so many occassions i have lost count.

 

they really are living up to their name of SHABBEY.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to Hardship Forum.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately if she hasn't incurred any charges during the last year they might well class her as being ineligible for a payment under the hardship waiver.

 

However, I note that you mention that her husband has left and this might make a difference if she appeals their decision.

 

Before appealing she should check to see if any of the following criteria applies to her situation.

 

In making an assessment for hardship the banks should take into account:

 

 

evidence of changes in lifestyle, including loss of employment; disability; serious illness; imprisonment; relationship breakdown; death of a partner; starting a lower paid job; parental/carer leave; and starting full-time education

 

They should also take into account such things as:

 

 

items repeatedly being returned unpaid due to lack of available funds;

 

failing to make loan repayments or other commitments;

 

discontinuation of regular credits;

 

notification of some form of insolvency or court proceedings;

 

regular requests for increased borrowing or repeated rescheduling of debts;

 

making frequent cash withdrawals on a credit card at a non-promotional rate of interest; and

 

repeatedly exceeding a credit card or overdraft limit without agreement (and, in this regard, where a complainant has incurred over £500 in unauthorised overdraft charges in the previous 12 months, that is to be treated as indicative of financial difficulty).

 

The full FSA Waiver can be found using the following link.

 

FSA Waiver

 

 

enamae

  • Haha 1

Please note: I have no qualifications in this area and any advice offered is given in good faith.

 

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/Ombudsman-news/40/40_setoff.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks. i will show it all to my friend and see what we can come up with. her hubby has been gone three years or so, and during that time, it has taken her ALL of that time to get herself back on an even keel. two kids as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...