Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Comet mis-sell products??


831badger
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5360 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We purchased a 2 televisions from Comet 1 week back. We also purchased a monster power surge protector.

 

Comet told us that as we were purchasing the 2 televisions they would do a deal on the monster socket and knocked £50 off the price.

 

We discovered that the 2nd tv we purchased had no remote but were assured that it would be with us within a couple of days.

We returned to the store 2 days later to be told that the remote could now take up to 2 weeks. After some discussion we were told they could try and have one sent from another store but this could take a few days (subsequently this has never materialised).

 

We obviously became frustrated as the tv is not the easiest to operate withou a remote We therefore decided to go look at Currys to see what they had with a view to taking the goods back and shopping elsewhere.

 

At currys we discovered that they had no 2nd tvs that matched the style or price range we wanted and that the main plasma tv was £50 cheaper than at comet. We returned to Comet and spoke with the manager who informed us that we'd had a discount and that we weren't getting anymore. We stated that the discount had been for the Monster item and not the tv so now we had found it cheaper elsewhere we would like them to price amtch. He told us that the salesman had taken the discount off the tv and not the monster item as he wasn't allowed to discount that! Is that not mis-selling? Is there not a fraud offence there as well?

 

We then discovered only a few days later (less than a week after purchase) that the tv price has been brought down in price to match the Currys price.

 

I have ended up returning the 2nd tv and had to purchase a more expensive one as the remote has not materialised and they have not been very helpful overall...

 

What can i do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I had a similar problem, the price match promise is a load of rubbish. We told them we saw the same tele somewhere else cheaper and they pretended to phone the shop, they said that they could not match the price because the other shop did not have any of that model in stock. I rang the other shop there and then on my mobile and they did have some in stock. You can imagine how I loudly I started kicking off. Eventually they gave me my refund, " as a goodwill guesture" more like getting rid of me

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Badger regarding to your issue, the discount applied would have been for the monster essentials. As it shows up on the store figures and essentials are targetted they were never allowed to discount the actual essentials item.

Best way to deal with it now is to put this into writing in a polite manor to the Headoffice and explain the situation.

The store most probably will be first once to deal with this issue and they normally have 4 hours to respond.If not it goes to the Area Managers level and so on.

It is normal procedure for the main items to be discounted instead of any add ons.

But this shouldnt really be a big issue as the store should see the problem that this has happened and give you the difference back.

Just a polite notice to the headoffice will be enough to get the ball rolling.end of the day £50 is still £50 .

Hope this helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...