Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Is this Egg CCA Enforceable


Montague123
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5475 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

I have sent two letters to Egg requesting my signed cca and have only had T & Cs back

 

However 3 weeks ago i sent a final settlement figure to them to end this saga and suddenly i was sent the below

 

I would really appreciate if anyone could look at it and advise me if its enforceable or not - its from 2001

 

I am fairly new to this and would appreciate any help

 

Unfortunately i am unable to use photbucket so if anyone would be kind enough to send me their email address i can email the PDF to them.

 

Thank you so much and i relaly do appreciate you guys help

 

many thanks

 

Montague

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all so much for your help and responses

 

I guess its unenforceable then

 

I have read all the info re pre 2005 egg agreements and just to be sure - sorry to keep asking

 

But is this enough to stop paying Egg??

 

Thank again

 

Montague

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only you can decide that but with what you've got and the case law now available (albeit first stage court) from pt, you will have a decent chance of getting a favourable result in court if you get that far. Personally I haven't heard anything from egg for months after sending my account in dispute letter.

 

cds:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys for all your help

 

Cancelled my Direct Debot today and sent a letter off saying thank you for the signed CCA but it is unenfoceable due to ........

 

See what they say

 

Really appreciate everyones help

 

Montague

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that there is a consensus on these agreements being unenforceable.

 

However, an important thing to bear in mind is your credit rating.

 

Have you been defaulted on this account?

 

If not, you will get a default as soon as you stop paying, and this will cause you problems for at least 6 years. Not just in obtaining credit but in getting a normal bank account or joint financial products with other people such as a partner.

 

The only way that I am aware of being able to prevent your credit rating being trashed is to win an unenforceability case in court and then get an injunction against Egg. This is obviously a long and involved process (two processes in fact).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...