Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

comet and acer with linux


missmp
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5399 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

Please can anyone help me!

My partner bought an acer aspire one from comet with linux on it, as we do not know anything about linux, he asked if it could do the same things as windows and was told yes and that linux just looks different, when he brought it home, we found that we could not install programs onto it and that it also had a fault, when it starts up it reaches a blue screen then restarts itself, then freezes.

he returned it to the store to ask to change it for a windows one, they said no, he told them that it also had a fault, but was told to contact acer, then head office.

when we contacted head office, they told us it was at the managers discretion, i sent several e-mails to them, but they keep insisting we contact acer, so i finally sent them an e-mail quoting the sale of goods act to them, saying that the product was not as described and unfit for purpose and if i did not receive a refund within 7 days i would take them to court, they have replied saying that the need acer to check that there is a fault, i replied that the contract is with comet and not acer and i want a refund.

But i don't know what else i can do now!

Can anyone advise me on how to take them to court?

any suggestion would be most appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

when did you buy it?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your e-mail

 

They have now sent me the following reply:-

 

 

The store do not accept that the unit has been mis-sold. This being the case, they can only address your claim that the unit is faulty.

 

The Sales of Goods Act affords us the right to inspect a product to confirm a fault, and once confirmed, to attempt a repair. We are entitled to use a repair agent of our choosing, and in the case of computer equipment, we use the manufacturer as the agent.

 

For the purpose of diagnosis of the fault, we request the customer contact the agent (Acer) directly. However, if you do not wish to do so, the store will contact Acer on your behalf.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have obviously been reading my thread about Comet so hers a copy of the initial letter I sent to them.

 

This is to give you some idea of what to put but I don't mind if you copy relevant bits. When you have compiled a letter post it up on here and I am sure somebody will have a read at it and offer advice

 

If you are going to threaten court action you must do it if they don't sort the problem in your time scale. Do not back down

 

You could also have a general look round on this site to get a bit of knowledge about taking court action, it's not really that hard just requires a bit of careful planing a bit of time and some patience

 

Mr Miniconverter

Our House

Shefcaster near Doncasfield

SD1 2BC

06th January 2009

01142898989

07852898989

Dear Sir

On the evening of 5th January 2009 I visited you store with an Acer laptop which has a fault on the disc drive. I was informed by a member of your staff called Chris that I must take it away and download a program to repair the fault and your company could not accept it for repair as Acer would not collect it until they had authorised a repair which in the circumstances they would not.

You where also unable to give me details of the web address where this program could be found or any other details of the download.

May I at this point remind you that my contract of sale as governed by the SOGA is with Comet Group PLC and not with Acer or any other third party and is wholly Comets responsibility

I have owned this since 19th April 2008 which in turn was purchased to replace one bought in November 2007 which you refunded (your repair number 1951114) as this had developed the same problem but you where unable to repair even though it was returned to me on 3 occasions.

As you refused to repair the defective item I rejected the goods as being not fit for the purpose intended or of merchantable quality and ask for a refund which was also refused.

I then spoke to John Leak the sales manager who also refused a refund for the defective laptop.

For the avoidance of doubt I hereby reject the goods an Acer Aspire laptop model number 5315 which was purchased from Comet Rotherham branch number 1066 on the 19th April 2008 for the purchase price of £299.99 as being not of merchantable quality and not fit for the purpose intended. I therefore rescind the contract as is my right under the sale of goods act 1979 and as amended section 48A(2)(ii) and require an immediate cash refund.

You must agree and action this refund in cash within seven days of this notice. . I feel this is a reasonable request considering the size of your organization. Failure to provide a full refund within this time scale will result in legal action being taken. No reminder will be made.

It is a legal protocol that notice be given before an action in county court is taken. This letter satisfies that requirement. No extension of my time scale will be given.

I have included a daytime and mobile phone number for your convenience but will consider your failure to contact me further refusal to refund for the defective laptop.

If you are unsure of the content or the implications of this letter I suggest you seek legal advise.

Yours Faithfully

Mr Miniconverter

Cc Comet group PLC

George Street

Hull

HU1 3AU

 

 

Hope this is of help to you if you need any more help just ask

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks miniconvertor

 

I have compiled the following letter, am I waffling on to much in it?

 

Dear Jeremy Holmes

On the 17th February 2009 I visited you store In Beckton, East London to buy a laptop, I looked around and liked the look of the Acer Aspire One as it was so small,

I spoke to a sales assistant named Asma

and asked to look at one, as the ones on display were all switched off, I noticed it looked different to normal computers and was told that it had linux on it not windows, so I asked if it was the same as windows, and was told that it was, and that it just looked different,

I asked if they all had linux on them and was told they did,so not knowing anything about linux, I then discussed whether this would be suitable for my needs, and was assured that it would be, She then showed me on her computer all the different hard drive specifications and advised that I purchase the Acer Aspire One with a 120 GB hard drive as it had the biggest storage space which would be suitable for pictures and video. But when I arrived home and started to use the Netbook, I discovered that it was unsuitable as I was unable to install software or programs and was also unable to view pictures from my camera or certain media content on the Internet

I then visited your store on the 26th February and spoke to a sales person named Amy, I explained to her that the netbook with linux on it was unsuitable for my needs and that I would like to exchange it for one with XP as I had noticed that they had some with XP on them , I also told her that it seemed to have a fault.

She went away, when she returned she refused to give me an exchange or refund.

I explained that the product had been sold to me and was not as described, not fit for the purpose intended and not of merchantable quality and asked to speak to the manager, but she said that this is what he had said and that he wouldn't come out. I was then told that I must contact acer for a repair and was then given Acer's phone number.

May I at this point remind you that my contract of sale as governed by the SOGA is with Comet Group PLC and not with Acer or any other third party and is wholly Comets responsibility

For the avoidance of doubt I hereby reject the goods an Acer Aspire One Netbook model number ZG5 which was purchased from Comet, Beckton on the 17th February 2009 for the purchase price of £229.00 as not being as described, not fit for the purpose intended and of not being of merchantable quality . I therefore rescind the contract as is my right under the sale of goods act 1979 and as amended section 48A(2)(ii) and require an immediate cash refund.

You must agree and action this refund in cash within seven days of this notice. . I feel this is a reasonable request considering the size of your organization. Failure to provide a full refund within this time scale will result in legal action being taken. No reminder will be made.

 

It is a legal protocol that notice be given before an action in county court is taken. This letter satisfies that requirement. No extension of my time scale will be given.

 

I have included a mobile phone number for your convenience but will consider your failure to contact me further refusal to refund for the netbook, which is of no use to me.

 

If you are unsure of the content or the implications of this letter I suggest you seek legal advise.

 

Yours Faithfully

 

Cc Comet group PLC

George Street

Hull

HU1 3AU

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Thank you for your e-mail

 

They have now sent me the following reply:-

 

 

The store do not accept that the unit has been mis-sold. This being the case, they can only address your claim that the unit is faulty.

 

The Sales of Goods Act affords us the right to inspect a product to confirm a fault, and once confirmed, to attempt a repair. We are entitled to use a repair agent of our choosing, and in the case of computer equipment, we use the manufacturer as the agent.

 

For the purpose of diagnosis of the fault, we request the customer contact the agent (Acer) directly. However, if you do not wish to do so, the store will contact Acer on your behalf.

 

 

It certainly has been mis-sold. You were told Linux could do all Window could but it certainly can't and there are a multitude of problems with software not being able to be installed onto it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Not to interfere here, as comet isn't my area of expertise although computers are.

 

What version of linux does it come with, a full version of linux will indeed do everything that windows does albeit in a slightly different way. If it's the version currys sell with their acer netbooks. it will come with a lite version of linux such as linpus, and it certainly can't do everything windows can do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

There might be a problem with drivers for some devices ...

 

It also depends on what programs the OP was trying to install. You wouldn't be able to install windows programs that come with a camera etc directly without something like "WINE", but it would be better to find native linux alternatives - most likely freeware

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...