Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Business T & C 1991


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5373 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Does anyone have a copy of the Natwest business account terms and conditions in effect for 1991. I have a hearing looming and am in desperate need of them.

Please Click The Scales if I have been of help to you.

 

 

Kensington Mortgages withdrawn. no costs

NatWest Settled in full

Abbey Court Settled in Full

Capital 1 settled in full

Halifax settled in full :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

hi just noticed your 1991 nat west business question......i started my very small business then and got little help and have wondered about the way they only gave me a very small initail overdraft under £500 .....and they basically then gave me no free banking because of the overdraft and also of course ran into charges almost immediatly .....i think my overdraft now is made up of all the charges etc..............i need to investigate it as it has come to a head recently with them leaving me on the most unsuitable business tariff for me......suitable for them though.......mal- administration ...was what the ombudsman said for nearly 4 years..but i feel they have never helped me from 1991 and the start all the way.... thanks........john....

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry our there not good at this stuff.....dont even know how to navigate the site.......anyway if someone can tell me this.....if you are a very small business ie one man band jobby.......and your bank has been found guilty by the ombudsman of mal- administration for a 4 year period.........which was keeping me on the wrong charging tariff......can you use this as a reason to ask for charges back to 1991 or at least 1995 because they were not doing what they said they would and help you ........as i mentioned in the earlier question my now loan which used to be a overdraft until they defaulted it which is when i found these errors out.... i feel the loan i have could well contain alot of charges/interest built up by charges like i read on the site.........i read some chap was using a certain regulation of errors and bad practice to go back further than six years......sorry i can not use the site well so if you anyone can advise ..i thought as the ombudsman used the mal- administration verdict on them this could give me somekind of lever to say right i am not happy about all the charges and treatment from day one..........also i did not get back the overdraft set up costs during there error 4 x £200 set up when their error meant i was not getting that full amount......proberly £500 less than the amount i should have been getting because of the error and by the time of the last oerdraft set up cost i would have been getting at least £2000 less if you add the other penalty charges to the error etc....... any help will be nice.......thanks again.........

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...