Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Default Removal - taking on First Direct, AMEX, Hilldesden & RBS


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5886 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good Morning All

 

I have been advised to start my own thread on this after posting to the thread http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legalities/24013-defaults-proposed-method-removal-new-post.html

 

I have followed the instructions to the letter - literally LOL and sent the notice and the template letter to these organisations telling them to cease processing my personal data with the CRA's.

 

Status so far: Amex have responded saying they will get back to me. Nothing from RBS or First Direct. Hillesdon Securities have written a reply that I gather they don't know what they are talking about. This is what I have back from them:

 

Dear

 

Account number xxx formerly Citifinancial Europe xxx

 

Thank you for you letter.

 

The terms of your original contract with Citifinancial Europe permitted the disclosure of account data to the credit reference agencies and enabled them to transfer their rights to a subsequent acquirer of the account. Your account had defaulted prior to our acquisition and we continued to report the account status along with any changes in the amount outstanding. This is in line with responsible lending practices.

 

The default notice was issued by Citifinancial Europe to the address held on file prior to your account being defaulted. A stakeholder notice issued by the DTI in December 2006 clarified the issue of service of a default notice. Such a notice is deemed served if posted to the last known address.

 

I can confirm that all entries on account number 914xxxx are showing correctly as settled with all credit reference agencies. Due to the account going into default on the 31st May 2004, the default will remain on your credit file for 6 years from this date.

 

If you require a copy of your original agreement, to comply with this request, we will the statutory fee which remains at £1.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Director & Data Controller.

 

CAR2403 suggests they don't have a clue but I am unsure what to say back - they are a little "forceful" LOL.

 

Thanks all for your help !

 

Jamie :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

:) Hi Magictorch.

 

Whilst waiting for others to respond, do a search on the forum for 'Defaults' and have a read of some of the other threads. You are bound to come across similiar situations. Car (Chris) has some good threads so look out for them.

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends on what the reason you gave in the notice was for wanting them to cease processing.

 

In this letter you are sepcifically saying that you do not believe there is a signed agreement in place. If they do not provide it then you can go to court to get them to provide it:-

 

Notice Pursuant to Section 10, Data Protection Act 1998

Account No: xxxxxxxx

Dear Sir,

Take Notice that I require you to cease entirely from processing, or else that you do not begin to process, any personal data of which I am the subject within 7 days of the receipt by you of this notice.

This includes particularly, but not limited to, any processing involving the communication or passing of personal data of which I am the subject to any third party insofar as the said data relates wholly or in part to any alleged agreement between us.

This Notice is given on the ground that there is no signed agreement in existence that entitles you to process my personal data.

Further, the processing or continued processing by you of the said data will be likely to affect my credit rating and my reputation and cause substantial damage and/or distress to me in addition to that which may already have been caused and that as the processing of the said data in the way referred to in this notice would violate the first, fourth and sixth principles of the Data Protection Act 1998 to do so would be unwarranted.

If you fail to respond to this notice within the prescribed timescale I will make an application to the court under Section 10(4) Data Protection Act that you be ordered to comply with this notice.

This letter has been sent by Recorded Delivery.

Yours faithfully,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...