Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

A petition


Lula
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5890 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In remembering the case of a Lancashire couple, who recieved a horrific beating, for the way they were dressed and, in which an innocent young woman lost her life, the Alternative & Gothic community puts forward that the definition of hate crimes should expand to protect subcultural people where the law is concerned.

 

 

Most gothic/subcultural people regularly complain of being harrassed, abused, spat on or attacked for the way they look, having done or said nothing to otherwise provoke this. People who prefer ‘darker’ fashions; who sport facial piercings, alternative makeup or dyed hair regularly experience being singled out on these grounds, by the less tolerant. When this escalates to physical attack and, in this instance, death of an innocent person, it is clearly unnacceptable.

 

 

According to the home office, the definitions of ‘Hate Crime’ include race, religion, gender identity, sexual orientation and disability. We feel this list should also include: “On the basis of personal appearance or subculture”.

 

I have to agree with this, whilst I dont particularly like the way that they look (my daughter is one) there is no way that you should be subjected to the abuse and harrassment that people do suffer because of it.

 

You can sign the petition here

 

Petition to: Widen the definition of 'Hate Crime', to include crimes committed against a person or persons, on the basis of their appearance or subcultural interests.

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lula:)

 

I detest discrimination, abuse, bullying etc of any sort. It only leads in one direction.

 

This was horrific. Makes me wonder where our country is going. Sadly, there are so many examples.

 

I just wish that each person would at least think if not do, something nice and positive for a different person each day. 1 simple act by everyone would have such a positive impact on our society. The feeling you get from that is just immense.

 

I have signed the petition.

 

You take care. Kenny XXX

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think we really need more legislation on the issue; all the things you describe are already illegal. What we need to do is actually enforce the laws we already have.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

try pay it forward to spread happiness.... watch the film it really is a good !!!!

  • Haha 1

Only direct action by the masses will work....

 

Look at all successes they have never come from negotiation!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

For info Fergal

 

My post to Stevo referred to the fact he is now an occassional visitor whose interests are elsewhere.

 

His comment about another petition for people with hair of a certain colour is simply reflective of that. It does not however detract from the OPs sentiment which most people will agree with.

 

Regards, Kenny

Link to post
Share on other sites

KTC - I have no idea how you managed to decifer fergals statement? i still don't get it?? if you could translate it would be appreciated!

 

Incidently, i am not entirely sure i understand your response to fergal either?

 

From what i can gather, my comment is reflective of the fact that i dont spend as much time on this forum as i used to?

 

Thats nonsense.

 

My comment was reflective of my opinion, which was much better summed up by tomterm8 above.

 

imho these petitions are a waste of time and get on my wick.

 

now, i am not interested in getting involved in any bickering, and particularly not with you KTC. so hopefully we can leave it at that :-)

 

oh, after you have decifered fergals cryptic message lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think we really need more legislation on the issue; all the things you describe are already illegal. What we need to do is actually enforce the laws we already have.

 

You are of course perfectly correct tomterm.

 

However, whilst the "campaign" may not even be looked at by the powers that be, I see positive benefits in that it allows people to express their concern at such a sad and horrific event.

 

Additionally, sometimes events need to be highlighted so as they don't fall off the agenda. In this case, it also allows connection with a part of our society that are often, wrongly, ostracised. All sections of society visit this public forum and posts on the subject are read by all sectors of society, including goths.

 

Regards, Kenny

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Lula and other posters

 

this is the response from the government to the above petition

 

"You have signed an e-petition suggesting that the definition of 'hate crime' be widened to include crimes committed on the basis of a person's appearance or interests.

The Government's current definition of 'hate crime' is as follows:

  • A 'hate incident' is any incident which is perceived by the victim or any other person as being motivated by hate or prejudice.
  • A 'hate crime' is any incident which contributes to a criminal offence, perceived by the victim or any other person as being motivated by prejudice or hate.

Within this broad definition, legislation focuses on hate crimes on the basis of race, faith, sexual orientation, disability and gender identity - and it is these categories which are currently monitored. We do not plan to extend this to include hatred against people on the basis of their appearance or sub-cultural interests. These are not intrinsic characteristics of a person and could be potentially be very wide ranging, including for example allegiance to football teams - which makes this a very difficult category to legislate for. However, it is important to remember that this is within a legal framework that assumes that all violence is a very serious matter; and in addition, judges have discretion to look at a wide range of mitigating and aggravating factors when they are sentencing - and are likely to view attacks motivated by hatred of this kind as very serious indeed."

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...