Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HP HDX9160 laptop Brand New & Worthless


waynerp
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5930 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone.

 

i purchased a £1500 top of the range HP HDX9160 laptop at the beginning of the year for my home based business. i specifically bought this particular laptop as it has a 20" screen which i need for my internet based business.

i like to think that i know quite a bit about pc's/laptops and the web etc, as i am on it, and use them all day, however until buying this laptop i have never used windows vista before, so the erratic behaviour the laptop was showing i initially was putting down to my in experience of Vista.

the problems slowly became more problamtic, it get freezing, crashing, would not copy from an external hard drive, ( basically) it was doing lots of WEIRD things, but i could not point to a specific part of the unit that was doing it.

within about 2 weeks after buying it, i was online to the HP support who tried to resolve the problems online with me. i had countless conversations with them online and on the phone.

in the end i gave up and decided to get it sent away to be repaired by HP.

i wasn't happy about this as i have had to do it before and that didn't go well.

the laptop was returned to me a week later, with the keyboard half hanging off, where they have not reattached it properly and it is no starting to go back to it's old ways and playing up.

i am furious not only because they have not put it back together properly but it seems as though it is still faulty.

i spoke to HP and said that i have had enough of speaking to support online and on the phone, and it is a SERIOUS inconvenience to have it sent away again so i would like a refund or a replacement.

they said that i need to speak to comet.

i spoke to comet and they say that i need to speak to HP as the unit is still in warranty.

i don't want it repaired i just want a refund. is this possible??

 

many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

This has absolutely nothing to do with HP. The only ones liable are Comet and they are trying (as usual) to pass the buck.

 

Until the laptop is six months old, they have the responsibility to prove that it was not inherently faulty and under the sale of goods act, they, and only they (Comet) are liable.

 

Before contacting Comet, backup your info as this will probably be lost either by replacement or reinstallation of the OS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for quick reply.

 

i have read a small part of the sale & supply of goods act, and it quotes about inconvenience to the customer in regards to repair and time etc.

since i have spent so much time talking to HP online and on the phone, and the fact that i am always unsure as to commit myself to using the laptop full time as i have a huge amount of data and software to use and backup etc, it is a huge inconvenience on my part. am i entitled to demand a refund or replacement, or do comet have to test it. because the unit has already been supposedly repaired once, and they have tried several times online and on phone to solve the problems. i can't afford for this to carry on. i just want done with it and a new laptop. if they keep sending it away for repair it won't be a new laptop anymore, it'll be 3rd or 4th hand, if you see what i mean!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Comet kick off explain to them that YOU have an agreement with THEM, not HP, therefore until the laptop is 6 months old it is their responsibility to either repair or replace the computer. The latter will only apply if they are unable to repair it after 28 days - I think!

 

Don't let them fob you off - remember sale of goods act overrides everything..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...