Citicard: Missy06 - v - Citifinancial

[Enron]

Was awarded the cost of a days wages on appearing at hearing, which amounted to £62 including mileage allowance and parking.

 

Citi had not conducted themselves well in my claim, and think the judge was annoyed that they had turned up to the disposal hearing once there defence had been struck out instead of settling.

[Missy06]

Was awarded the cost of a days wages on appearing at hearing, which amounted to £62 including mileage allowance and parking.

 

Citi had not conducted themselves well in my claim, and think the judge was annoyed that they had turned up to the disposal hearing once there defence had been struck out instead of settling.

 

So have they settled the claim now?

[Missy06]

I've merged your threads Missy, as it is all the same subject and we now know it's Citi!

 

I'll confirm the best way forward as soon as possible.

 

Els

 

Thanks a million! In the meantime I'll be putting my Wasted Cost Order together for submission to court on Monday!

[Enron]

Yep, Citi settled after the court orderred it.

 

The case management notes were a bit stinging from Citi's point of view - if you fancy a read here they are:

 

http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c104/telso/citi/a.jpg

http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c104/telso/citi/b.jpg

http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c104/telso/citi/c.jpg

[BankFodder]

If you need the money badly then sign he order. However, you might consider striking out the bit on confidentiality - and also add "save for an application for wasted costs" to the bit about costs.

 

Then Citi will have to agree this of course and they may not wish to in which case the whole issue may have to go on. I am at a loss to understand why they have had their judgment setaside when it is clear from this that there is no intention to defend. I would want to write to the judge pointing this out and saying that clearly their setaside application was abusive. It all depends on how badly you need the money.

[Missy06]

If you need the money badly then sign he order. However, you might consider striking out the bit on confidentiality - and also add "save for an application for wasted costs" to the bit about costs.

 

Then Citi will have to agree this of course and they may not wish to in which case the whole issue may have to go on. I am at a loss to understand why they have had their judgment setaside when it is clear from this that there is no intention to defend. I would want to write to the judge pointing this out and saying that clearly their setaside application was abusive. It all depends on how badly you need the money.

 

I think I'll keep the part on confidentiality in and add "save for an application for wasted costs".

 

Their judgment was initially set aside as they claimed they weren't aware of the claim in the first place and weren't given the opportunity to file a defence!:o......liars!

 

I'm not desperate for the money but more interested in seeing justice carried out. These coporates just try to intimidate the average Joe Blog:mad:......and I won't be intimidated. They either settle with Wasted Costs or we take it back to the court!

[Missy06]

Yep, Citi settled after the court orderred it.

 

The case management notes were a bit stinging from Citi's point of view - if you fancy a read here they are:

 

http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c104/telso/citi/a.jpg

http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c104/telso/citi/b.jpg

http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c104/telso/citi/c.jpg

 

Interesting! Which solicitor was representing Citi in your claim?

[elsinore]

Have you got a default registered with the credit reference agencies by Citi?

If so, the removal of it could be another condition of acceptance.

 

Els