Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Consumer Rights - Comet Money Back


Dollifer
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6047 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In August I purchased a laptop from Comet. 2 weeks after having it I had to send it to be repaired due to a constant loud, high pitched whine it emitted. I got it back 10 days later with the noise even louder. The very next day I returned it to the repair department (Service Source Europe/Hewlett Packard). I only received it back on the 13th of this month (November) still with a high pitched noise. I thought I could live with it as it was slightly quieter but I cannot, apart from it being extremely irritating, it gives me headaches and cannot use it for very long at all which is not very useful. So, it's been roughly 3 months since this saga began and I am in the process of trying to get my money back from Comet. I paid almost 1000 pounds for this laptop and I do not expect to hear this whine coming from it. (The keyboard rattle too and the rest of it sounds like a jet engine!) The repair department do not listen to me when I tell them that it is not the fan (that they have replaced twice amongst other things, but has not worked) but in fact the CPU and the power states that make the noise as there is a program I downloaded that stops the noise immediately but does make the laptop get hotter than it should be. I should not have to run the program in the first place anyway. HP/Service Source offered me 50 pounds in vouchers for the inconvenience for it taking so long to be 'repaired' and Comet say that because I accepted these vouchers they can't do anything more. Surely that is not the case. I have not had anything in writing about the vouchers and have not received them either.

 

Could you please let me know where I stand on this matter.

 

Thanks x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if the voucher thing was correct, seeing as you have not received them, and they cannot prove you have, then they are right out of the equasion.

Take it into the shop, get them to listen to it and tell them that it has been in for repair twice and on neither occassion has it been repaired and that you have not had any use from it since purchase.

Tell them you are rejecting the laptop and request your purchase price be returned in full.

 

I would remove any utilities that have been installed by you before your visit, you don't want them using that as an excuse as they will try all they can not to pay you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On acceptance of the vouchers, you could argue that they area gesture of goodwill only. Having an item repaired does not constitute acceptance of goods, and I would not say that 2 weeks is sufficient for goods to be accepted (with a laptop anyway) - but that has to be decided by a court.

 

Read my sticky on the General Knowledge forum (any emoticons for blowing your own trumpet?) and also the one on this section which covers quite well the legislation and case law on goods.

 

That will help you form a good argument. even if the goods have been accepted, and as three repaors have not yielded a result, you will still be entitled to a replacement or refund. What that person is saying about accepting vouchers is, in my view, nonsense. Report it to Consumer Direct as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you both for you responses. I called Comet yet again and left a message with the person who was supposed to be calling me before 6:30 ( I rang at 6:20 and she'd already left) and informed them that I was now officially rejecting the laptop and that I wanted my money back in full. Whether or not the message will be passed on I don't know, but I shall try calling again tomorrow but as it's Saturday I doubt this person will be in.

 

I have also contacted Consumer Direct and am now waiting for a response.

 

My Cousin just got a Laptop and it's completely silent (like every body elses that I've listened to over the past 3 months!)

 

Thanks again guys!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Further to my thread: Consumer Rights - Comet Money Back; I have now rejected the laptop, informed them by letter and by phone (had to leave a message *roll eyes*) any advice as to what I should do now? Should I wait to hear back from the head office that I have sent the letter to, or take it back to the store?

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How did you pay for the item? if it was by credit card, you can claim the money back from them and let them deal with Comet

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...