k65 v natwest stayed

[k65]

despite being a conference hearing i attended court as i had no correspondence from cobbets,

i was surprised to find cobbets had sent a boy to represent them.

after we each stated our case the judge decided to allow the stay,

however cobbets boy wanted to stop me appealing against the decision stating it was a waste of courts time etc.

my arguement being that defence had not followed the oft waiver and i had not at that time submitted evidence to prove hardship as it was cobbets show.

the judge said although i had a good aurgument for my case cobbets was slightly stronger so he allowed the stay but has allowed me to submit an apeal.

 

however i may decide to accept the banks offer (still valid i assume) it would mean a difference of £2000.00 less.

But it would remove £5000.00 in debts.

once my head ache has cleared i will make the decision

[zootscoot]

Hi K65,

 

You need to be aware that if you appeal the decision regarding the stay and lose you will become liable for costs for the appeal.

 

All the best whatever you decide to do

 

Zoot