No, they can't. DVLA is not interested in the ownership of a vehicle, only who is keeping it. If they apply to the DVLA for a change of keeper then:- 1) the DVLA will write to you to see if the request is genuine, and 2) changing RK does not affect ownership in any way.

OK, second front. On the reverse of the PCN it starts "The Act overleaf"; unfortunately no Act is quoted on the front. (a series of Acts is). Also, in the grounds for representations, they instruct you to tick one box. This has been previously held to be fettering your decisions. They seem to reword the statutory grounds to suit themselves; fetter your grounds under without consent to stolen only, under I was not the owner you are must state to whom you have sold the vehicle - this PCN has been sent to the RK who is assumed to be the owner, thus there is no option for the RK to name the owner.

Whether or not the stopped within the box is completely irrelevant IMO. This is a T-junction and not a crossroads; AFAIK, for a T-junction, the box may not cover the entire width of the carriageway (see TSRGD). I would therefore suggest that no contravention occurred due the the unlawfulness of the road markings

Er, 'Finest' is Tesco.

No, both Police and Camera Partnerships use temporary rear acting cameras

Name on the V5 is the registered keeper - nothing whatsoever to do with ownership.

Please explain exactly what is a registered owner? The DVLA only deal with the matter of registered keeper. What you have said is absolutely correct for the RK, but does not and cannot change ownership. Being RK without having ownership can considerably affect insurance.

DVLA have nothing to do with ownership and are thus not in a position to pass the ownership of any vehicle to another person.

Some confusion going on here. Having a V5 (or not) has absolutely nothing to do with ownership.

No

Then the loss would presumably be reclaimable from your travel insurer...

Do nothing Pay nothing Ignore any communications - however threatening they may appear. What you actually have is an unenforceable invoice.

The address on your driving licence is totally irrelevant for these purposes. The PCN is not sent to the driver, but the RK. D|id you change the address on the V5?

No. For the simple reason that the enabling Act only requires the seizing officer "to have reasonable belief" that the vehicle is uninsured.

Technically, no. 1) You are required by the rules concerning cherished numbers not to dispose of the vehicle until the transfer/retention is complete; 2) you are unable to notify disposal of the vehicle without the V5

My wife's. son's and my cars are all insured with different insurers. None of them requires the non-owned vehicle to have insurance. What matters in this country is that the driver is insured. There is absolutely no requirement in law for a vehicle to be insured

The signage shown in the pictures in your first post is totally incorrect and unenforceable. 1) No Entry signs must be in pairs either side of the road; 2) To allow buses, taxis and bikes, there needs to be a black lettering on white background rectangular plate stating this below each No Entry sign; 3) Road markings of that sort cannot stand alone - they may only reinforce other signage

No, the date served is the 14th July; when you got it.

He also needs to check with DVLA about his licence. If they think it wasn't surrendered for points, it may have been revoked.

Duplicate post

Duplicate post

Duplicate post

Duplicate post

Duplicate post

Duplicate post