BSC
Registered UsersChange your profile picture
-
Posts
364 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Post article
CAGMag
Blogs
Keywords
Everything posted by BSC
-
chipped tooth on fruit
BSC replied to pt1234's topic in Retailers - High Street and On-line Stores Forums
Is there any update? I'm really keen to know how your getting on with this -
of course you have sweetheart. If you really have been lurking all this time then I suggest you go back to doing it. Your silent contribution for such a long time was a blessing
-
chipped tooth on fruit
BSC replied to pt1234's topic in Retailers - High Street and On-line Stores Forums
no I meant the pit n. The single central kernel or stone of certain fruits, such as a peach or cherry. tr.v., pit·ted, pit·ting, pits. To extract the pit from (a fruit). -
chipped tooth on fruit
BSC replied to pt1234's topic in Retailers - High Street and On-line Stores Forums
This really is taking the 'pit' -
chipped tooth on fruit
BSC replied to pt1234's topic in Retailers - High Street and On-line Stores Forums
I'd try taking Mr Del Monte to the Small Claims Court -
chipped tooth on fruit
BSC replied to pt1234's topic in Retailers - High Street and On-line Stores Forums
Jesus wept - you chipped a tooth on a bit of fruit Mind you I bet one of the Ambulance Chasers would take this on -
I'd write to them telling them them you will only discuss the matter in writing and that no one is welcome to visit your property.
-
Tenancy Deposit: few quick questions
BSC replied to wisden123's topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues
Sorry but this is greed. Just my opinion I know, but at the moment you have suffered no loss and seem to be out to make money off the landlord. You moved in last week and already seem intent to give your landlord grief. -
8 days without a post. I'm suffering from withdrawl symptoms
-
Any update?
-
Have you had a look at the Gambling Comission website? Gives some great info on raffles
-
I still think the following is a better route to take. Write to Rosendales and tell them that thier Bailiff has made an attempt to defraud you out of £57.50 and could they explain why they are allowing this to happen. Personally I would also phone the bailiff himself (and I know most will advise against this) and tell him very clearly that if he continues to attempt to obtain money he is not owed you will raise a Form 4 complaint against him.
-
Have you tried the software update that has been suggested?
-
Mr W You pay the council and then write to the bailiff saying that you are happy to pay them if they can provide evidence that the two visits they claim took place and that the letters were not posted to you (you could even put something to the effect that you seem to remember a stamp being on the envelopes ) You may also want to ask them how they felt it acceptable to charge £100 when the maximum fees (if two visits have indeed taken place) is £42.50 and that you are considering a Form 4 complaint about their Bailiff if it is found that he is adding extra fees without their consent. The clever bit about the above paragraph is they wont want to drop their bailiff in it but also cannot say that they instructed him to charge the extra. With me the company then went silient. I would still pay the £42.50 if they wrote back to me or, in reality, if they turned up on the doorstep as, like yourself, I don't want or need the grief. regards BSC
-
Ultimately it's your choice but personally I think it daft to pay someone money who has blatantly tried to defraud you. They tried to charge you over double what they should have so why should they deserve a penny? Anyway you seem to have made your mind up so I won't comment any further. But rest assured, these crooks will carry on trying it on again and again as long as people like yourself are willing to pay them in these circumstances. They need to learn that the only acceptable method is to charge the correct amount from day one.
-
Binded - I do have a record. I wrote to them recorded delivery telling the the council was paid and that I happily pay them the correct amount if they could provide evidence of these visits. Should they not be able to do so I would consider the matter closed. I also gave them 28 days to reply and I'm still waiting. DON'T PAY THESE CROOKS - THEY WERE TRYING TO TAKE MORE THAN THEY ARE ENTITLED TO AND DESERVE NOTHING. When they are honest then you can do the same
-
Could one of the Site Team merge this thread with the other one the OP has started on the same topic?
-
can't wait to hear the progress of that one Patma. Hopefully a few people aren't sleeping too well at the moment!
-
Patma have the Police indicated they will be investigating this as there would appear to be a clear case of fraud? Wouldn't this be terrible if it were turned on it's head for some 'poor soul' at the college or LD?
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
The Consumer Action Group
×
- Create New...
IPS spam blocked by CleanTalk.