Plonker1
Registered UsersChange your profile picture
-
Posts
59 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation
5 NeutralRecent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
So they responded...... they wanted me to fill out an income/expenditure form for them to be able to decide whether they would accept a payment plan they also sent me details how to pay I think I am just going to pay in full, I don't want to give them any information about myself, not that there is much anyway!
-
Hello, I emailed the courts regarding the costs that needed to be paid and as of yet I have not heard anything back. I remember the judge saying that it needed to be paid with 1 month otherwise the claimant wins automatically which I want to avoid. I have not been sent any instructions whatsoever. Andy, I'm just thinking when you said to email contact them regarding payment arrangements, did you mean contact Dryden's?
-
Hello, Since my last hearing and serving the document requested by the judge I have not heard anything from either the courts nor Dryden's. Should I be chasing up? I know they were awarded costs which had to be paid by a certain time, we agreed a month but I have not had any details or instructions etc.
-
Plonker1 started following Erudio/Drydens claimform - old SLC Loans . ***Claim Dismissed***
-
I had my hearing yesterday and I feel disappointed in how it went as I feel I that had a good judge, the advocate representing Dryden's was not great and I could of got a better result, but all is not lost........ We started by discussing the issue of ineligible credit agreements at which point the judge was questioning me whether I admitted to actually signing the documents and if it was my signature to which I accepted, she asked what's the problem with the agreements, I mentioned that I couldn't read the documents and they needed to comply with the CCA and gave her the appropriate section. She checked the CCA relevant section but mentioned that were they eligible at the time of signing? I stated I couldn't remember but probably they were eligible. She wasn't really buying it but did mention that it can be tested at trial. After this we went onto the default notices and she pointed out that they had served me copies which were included in their bundle. I mentioned that I don't recollect receiving them and that there needed to be 3 copies of the default notice and termination notices, she said that only 1 copy needed to be served and asked me for the relevant CCA section for this, unfortunately I didn't know this, my fault not being adequately prepared, if it exists? We then spoke about the deferment process and the ombudsman's decisions, Dryden's banged on about that these decisions are not mine and they are not relevant, I said, I included this to show how Erudio was behaving at the time to backup my point of not receiving documents etc. At this point she asked why I did not include the copy of the form I sent in that I said I had kept, I said that was an error on my part and that I have a copy, she went on about this for a while saying she can't understand why I have made a good job of submitting a WS but didn't not include this in the bundle. I maintained it was an error on my part and that I can provide, I also mentioned the fact that it was highlighted in the supplementary WS of Dryden's and after receiving this I did not have enough time. Before taking about this I was feeling confident she was going to send it to trial but after this my hopes began to dwindle, however, she wanted to give me the opportunity to supply this document and gave me 7 days to serve after which we would have another hearing if I served in time. I have the document and will serve, she did mention that I can serve another WS to accompany it. Due to the requirement to have another hearing which is no fault of Dryden's but mine she awarded cost to them for £425 which I have to pay within a month, otherwise I will be debarred from representing or something along them lines. I agreed to the costs as it was my fault that I hadn't provided the document regarding deferral and was just glad to have another opportunity. Nothing else was really spoken about, she mentioned that I will receive a directions questionnaire so I don't know if that means the next hearing will be a trial or a repeat of the one we just had. I feel like now I have attended one hearing I will be much more confident in the next one and prepared! So all is not lost(apart from £425 costs)...............just yet What you guys think?
-
Andy any chance you can explain the stuff about the hearsay evidence as I don't get it. I take it the bit on the breach of provisions is in relation to Erudio's inability to serve notices, statements etc on time? The bare denial stuff relates to me not accepting the copies of the signed agreements due to them being ineligible,
-
I've added: I make reference to the Financial Ombudsman Service website and their relevant decisions about this period of change by Erudio, whereby numerous people suffered this issue around the same period. In these circumstances the Financial Ombudsman Service made decisions that Erudio should rollback arrears and accept post deferment, see Exhibit 1 (DRN- 3629000) and Exhibit 2 (DRN-4141462) attached. Ill mark them as exhibit 1 and exhibit 2 when attaching to the WS
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
The Consumer Action Group
×
- Create New...
IPS spam blocked by CleanTalk.