I have had an email from LPA Council today they are taking it up as enforcement issue.
What sent me into a panic was have missed something as obviously I do not want to obstruct a Court Order.
There is long saga to this.
He appears to have being complaints to various bodies about me for a number of years all came to nothing.
He invited Environment Health on to our garden without consent numerous to look at imaginary poo.
The Council had to admit they had been on our garden without consent.
Equally he has taken photos without consent and sent them to the Council.
He included a photo he had taken in his Court bundle so we know this actually happened.
He also invited the Council onto our garden without consent.
I have it in writing from the Council he actually did this.
We have been told (and are trying to get that confirmed with the Court) that he took over immediate next door neighbour to Court and obtained a Court Order. He apparently did this with photos from inside our garden.
The problem with this Complaints we struggled with the DPA to get access to them.
I am requesting Photos taken on our property under GDRP and doing from a slightly perspective this time
There is an interest case Jefferies versus Robb CA 28 th June 2012.
The outcome is you must use the easement for its intended purpose not for spying, snooping harassment or taking photos.
He must not prevent the enjoyment of our land.
Initially issue is to sort out the Planning issue then further legal advice re the rest of the issues.
If anyone has any thoughts please do comment as I can see this affecting people too in relation to Jefferies versus Robb and the statuatory planning issues.
There may be one trees that will need a TPO a huge Ash tree that is absolutely gorgeous particularly in summer and so very pretty.
It is very dominant and dominants the gardens of the neighbours behind.
Jefferies v Robb CA 28 June 2018 is fascinating and incredibly helpful to anyone who has an easement on their land.