multitrackhelp
Registered UsersChange your profile picture
-
Posts
37 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation
1 Neutral-
Other party not carried out a direction
multitrackhelp replied to multitrackhelp's topic in General Legal Issues
Sorry being vague it's for Serving Disclosure Lists. They should have done it 7 days ago -
Other party not carried out a direction
multitrackhelp replied to multitrackhelp's topic in General Legal Issues
It was in relation to evidence -
Hi If a party fails to carry out a direction ordered by the judge and Other side has, should I write to the court and advise them? Can the court sanction the other side ( it's not on the smalls claims track)
-
Hi, I am defending a multi track case and i have the DQ form: formfinder.hmctsformfinder.justice.gov.uk/n181-eng.pdf Am ok with the rest of the form but it is asking for draft directions, i have looked on google, can anyone point me as what draft directions i should be looking at putting forward?
- 3 replies
-
- directions
- multi
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
I wouldn't use the term lying . The term falsehood is more appropriate. The point being if a claimaint can be shown with evidence to be have misled the court then this should be driven home
-
Andy, In this case i believe i have to reference the fact i have certain items which will prove the claimant is effect lying, but i will edit the defence to remove references to any material i have except where it is essential
-
Hi I am just in the process of writing a defence to a claim. As you are aware you dont include evidence with the actual defence submission. I will be providing a fair bit of evidence in the defence of a claim against me. Should I at this stage in the defence statement when referring to evidence list the evidence as say "in exhibit 1 i will show the claimant to be untruthful", or should i be more generic and say the evidence I shall produce will show the claimant to be untruthful Which sounds better and which would be easier for the court to follow?
-
Yes it's a fair strategy. I want to put them to as much expense and difficulty as possible.
-
The initial directions from the judge don't mention this........ I have read on tinterweb a case where the claimant was instructed to pay the correct fee with directions questions. I guess I don't want the chance of this happening to be missed. Of course the judge might accept there is no need for a further fee to be paid
-
Hi i will be going bankrupt in any case as i owe over 35k in unsecured debt and have no assets, Yes i received an order from the judge yesterday morning saying it was not suitable for a part 8 claim and should continue as if it had been on Part 7 So with the above i am not bothered about what the losing amount is,. the hearing fee as it will be on multi track is 1k
-
I simply want to force him to pay the full fee . Will be an extra 1k which may make him think twice