Thanks for the pub guns and cannons

the case relates to a landlord that withheld my tools of trade ( sound system ) in May this year when he kicked out his tenant only to pass my tools on to his new tenant to use who then threatened me if I tried to get them back this was witnessed by a hight court sheriff. it was reported to the police who said it was a civil matter and would not help me get my tools back. the landlord put a counter claim in for storage. I have never met this guy or had any agreement with him and I have receipts to say the tools are mine. the landlord refused to help me deal with the new tenant and eventually we ended up at the 10th sept. losses up to that date £5000 after the judge said it was criminal the police reluctantly helped me to arrange a call to fix a date to get my tools back as the landlord and tenant confirmed they had no title to my tools. when I called the tenant and advised him that I would be recording the call the tenant told be that he would no give me my tools back and that I should pay him £410 cash as instructed by the landlord. It took police two weeks to get access to recover my tools with promises they would make arrests for the theft and extortion threat but fails to honour their promise. and this is where I'm having problem as the judge clearly stated it was a criminal case I'm concerned that he will not confirm what he said and risk it been thrown out of court at the next hearing. today I have been told that the court failed to send the recordings as I requested for transcript in October even though that stamped to say they received it so I just want some clarity.... . I have offered to to stop all proceedings and swallow my losses and sent a letter to the landlord to stop all proceedings. but yesterday I got a letter from the landlord wanting £300 before he will stop his counter claim. this is my story

yes thanks for your response least I was able to vent some frustration on here it has actually helped as I've had a pm from some one who saw this post that I linked I linked to and is willing to help. I may consider updating this post with the outcome. but I'm told by this new help not to waist my time on this type of site.?

Ok so how can I structure this complaint please. I can understand that they may alert the defendant but he should already have been there like I was on the 10th. The court saying he got lost is the wrong reason for an excuse. if they did alert him then maybe they should have written this. If I'm to accept he got lost then Im to assume that he intended to go court. and could have walked the 100m to his regular court house that he does attend on other matters. I did say its hard to believe but on the 10th of September I was shocked by how I was treated by court staff and the judge. my case files were fine and the judge made direction without reading them if they intended to alert the defendant they should have told me so. The court is not local to me its a in the next city so I could have waited at the court for him to arrive. The defendant has not filed any papers to me about his counter claim evidence etc. the hearing should have gone ahead by my account. the theft... police say its a civil matter the judge says criminal and I should go to the police to get my goods back the police give it a criminal case number and ceased my tools for me. but failed to arrest the defendant. the judge says that my case has no place in his court but will not confirm he said this. Now Im £5000+ in losses and fear full that when I turn up for the next hearing its going to be thrown out on criminal grounds. I've asked for clarity and help with forms I receive none. I just want to construct a proper complaint I know its hard to see what impact its having but surly I'm allowed clarity on what the judge said when he directed me. because there is no mention of advice to go to the police as told by the judge saying its a matter for a criminal court. this may have implications to my civil case.

If you read what I said I'm not complaining about it being moved to Barnsley I requested it to be moved there in fact. I was high lighting that this is a local court to a defendant that attends court on a regular basis but claims to have got lost on this occasion. but if you want to pick on my spelling that's fine I only asked for help. The post is a copy of the letter that is my complaint it says so at the bottom of the post and maybe I could have been more clear but you stopped reading it and made assumptions. it was not about CAG. maybe you could have spent a little more time just to read my draft complaint that it is what I want to send to the court not CAG, that's if you have the time. Sorry to have bothered you and your site. I will take note of you advice about normal practice but what I meant by this comment is where applications have been sent in and then returned with the evidence paperwork held back by the court and sent later so that when new paperwork was handed in thinking the court already had the evidence from before they sent that evidence back and rejected my new forms because I did not send the evidence with the form. This delay made me have to go to the courthouse on the last day to make sure it was signed and accepted as it was. in full knowledge by this court of my 3 attempts to send corrected forms on time, by this time they apparently vacated the hearing before the deadline for forms and two weeks before the hearing date and failed to notify me. If the same person how stamped your forms as accepted on time then tried to give you a letter to say that I had not handed them in on time and I had more or less lost my court case what would you do? I would like to know is it court practice to alert a defendant? Is it court practice that when asking for help you have the phone put down on you? Is it court practice to not tell me the complains managers details? Is it fair that Im put in front of a judge as an alternative to the complaints manager thinking Im getting a hearing only to be told he had not read my case files and then grilled me because of him not reading them them Is it court practice that when requesting clarity from a judge who's said that my case was a criminal case not a civil matter you get a response of " the judge said you are confused " when it was him who never read my case files or allowed me to speak" This is a genius attempt to some help.

My case relates to theft of my equipment by miss appropriation, extortion, embezzlement, threats and recovery of goods and consequential losses. Dear Claims Regulations. I am writing to complain about how I am being treat and how my claim is being dealt with by staff at Barnsley court. I have evidence of special treatment towards the defendant that I feel is de-neighing me access to justice. From the very beginning of my case being transferred to a local court (Barnsley) to the defendant, It appears I have had to jump through In my opinion unnecessary hoops to put my application in. I have had deadlines forced upon me when I believe perfectly good paper work was submitted within these deadlines. More so I believe there is personal contact between the court staff and the defendant. On the 10th of September I attended court only to be told there was no hearing because I had missed a deadline with my remission form. I was told by Miss / Mrs A ???? that I should have got a letter of notice to say that hearing was cancelled because I had missed the deadline. I showed proof of a court stamp on my remission form to ??????, this is the same person who stamped that remission form two weeks before as accepted, this was voice recorded as proof of the court accepting it. I personally travelled to the court to have this stamp and even was given direction on which room and where to go on the day of the hearing. On the 10th of September I demanded to go to the reception to speak to A ????? to show her the stamp she put on my form. ??????? implied that the defendant and myself should have received a letter of cancel and so there would be no hearing on the 10th September, she even showed me this letter but I had not received that letter. I demanded to see the complaints manager who never turned up, but instead I was put in front of Judge ???????? who grilled my case files saying he was giving me direction not advice, and that my case was a criminal case and had no place in his court. I was given very little chance to speak. I could provide evidence of this but a transcript of that hearing would show the judge was clear in saying more than once that my case relates to theft. The defendant was not there so I can only presume he got the letter from ????? saying the hearing was cancelled. After the hearing I received instruction of a new hearing within it was a note that the defendant had turned up to court late because he got lost and an exception was made for him. It is with great concern that this exception has been allowed If the defendant got a letter to say the hearing had been cancelled then how come he turned up half an hour after I had left? I suspect someone must have alerted the defendant that I was there is such a short time this must have been a personal call. There is only three possibilities that I can see 1: There was no letter of cancel or it was not sent out. In which case the defendant should have turned up to court and there would have been a hearing as arranged. This letter was shown to me by A Copley on the 10th September at the court reception and was recorded. Breach of Court rules, unfairness, negligence 2: The defendant did get this letter that the hearing was cancelled, giving the real reason why he was not there. Then he must have been alerted by some one in the court that I was being heard by the judge, so he then turned up later to make his excuse of being lost. Which for a regular attendee of the court Is something to question. Breach of Court rules, unfairness, negligence. 3: The court & the defendant have fabricated a lie to give exception to the defendant. Breach of Court rules, unfairness, negligence, After the letter with the new hearing date on it, I asked for clarity from the judge towards his comments on a criminal case, as the police reluctantly were acting on what I told them about what the judge said. I asked the court for clarity as I did not want to turn up at the next hearing for the judge to dismiss it under criminal grounds. I receive a very short letter with speech marks apparently from the judge saying I was confused and miss understood him. I find it hard to believe this to be correct. So again I requested clarity explaining my concerns and asking for a transcript. Again I was told I was confused but was not given any explanation to help me understand. I asked for a transcript and the new hearing to be moved to another date. I was told to fill in forms for adjournment and transcript requests and send them with remission forms from the court website which I did. Then I got a reply that told me I have filled in the old remission form, and was not accepted, even though I had got this form from the court website. So I called the court house and asked for the new forms, the member of court staff I was speaking to was currently looking at the correct form online, but would not give me the link so I could download the very same form for my self. I asked to speak to the manager but this member of staff made clear to me that she is the team leader who was in charge, she would not even give me the court managers name. Then she put the phone down on me. This call was recorded. I needed to speak to the manager to allow me more time to put the correct forms in, as requested by the court. It was only when I tried to contact the court manager that I was put to another member of staff which was not the court manager. This member of staff reluctantly arranged for a link to be sent to me. After I sent the updated form I then received a letter to say I did not qualify. If this is so then why all the Bureaucracy? Surely they could of explained this in previous letters, that I don't qualify. But even if I don't qualify for the full remission I may be entitled to make contributions or even full payment, but this was not offered to me. To me this Bureaucracy is evidence of delay tactics meant to benefit the defendant. I then went to citizens advice in Doncaster who calculated I do qualify for full remission of fees and I should write a letter of complaint to the ministry of justice and the police complaints department whilst also requesting the hearing be adjourned and moved to my local court while you investigate what treatment I'm receiving. All I ask for is to be treated fairly by the courts and police. The court giving me the run around on top of the theft has made me ill and I am now under medication for the stress caused by the court and police. The new hearing date is set for the ???? November, I would like it to be adjourned. This is more or less my complaint to court & M.O.J. I need to know on what I'm basing my complaint on is it bad service or more??? that's why I'm posting here.

the letter that was sent said the hearing had been vacated because I had not sent in my forms in on time. funny thing was I had court stamps on these forms accepted by the court and I caught the court out. Not at all I said I wanted to speak to the manager to ask for more time but she kept avoiding helping me. there was no need to put the phone down I wasn't rude or said anything bad I just asked for the link having heard her say she was looking at the form on line. This is the problem apparently the team leader says that there is no court manager that any complaints end up on her desk. She is one of the people I need to complain about.?

I did said its hard to believe but what do you say if 2 or 3 are true facts that can be proven.? its in black and white court paperwork. If I did not turn up to my arranged hearing I would lose by default. if the letter was not sent then as arranged the defendant should have been there at court being not aware of the letter. (Judgement in favour of claimant by default. no further hearing required) If I got a call from the court telling me to ignore the letter of cancel and get into court because the claimant was there... id be there like a shot. (this guys excuse was that he was 100m away from court and got lost when he has been to court many times) Its quite unbelievable its well sign posted and should not be accepted by the court as a valid excuse. If its more likely no.1 Then the court have cost me time and money through negligence.? To answer about the form well the court had the old remission form on the site so I asked for the new form as they returned my remission saying it was an out of date form. I recorded them talking in the back ground saying the courts website had the old form on and that she was looking at the new form on the computer. I asked her for the link to the new form and she would not give it to me she struggled to event say www. I told her that I heard her say to the others that she was looking at the new form on-line and asked for the link instead she said I had to got to my local Citizens advice which our local office only open 2 day a week. so I kept asking for the link and why she would not give it to me all I got was go find it your self. so I asked for the managers name she said she was team leader so I asked her again and she put phone down on me...!!! recorded.

Thank you for moving my post I hope I can get some help. My concerns are that the court staff have actually had personal contact with the defendant and have constructed a lie to allow the defendant to have another chance to defend himself. this is written evidence on court paper I will explain. I had a court date that I turn up to only to be told it was cancelled and I should have had a letter to say so. this letter should have also gone to the defendant and as he was not at court it was clear he either got this letter or he wasn't interested to defend himself. However after complaining I did get to have a directional hearing from the Judge on this day who grilled my case and would not let me speak. after a few days I got a notice from the court that a new hearing was set. In this letter there was no mention of the cancelled date or the sent out cancel notice letter that we were supposed to have got. But what was in the letter was a section that said the defendant had arrived late having gotten lost going to this his local court house as if it was some kind of excuse. How is it possible that this exception has been allowed?? There is only three possibilities that I can see 1: There was no letter of cancel or it was not sent out. In which case the defendant should have turned up to court and there would have been a hearing possibly judgement by default in my favour. ( I was shown this letter in the courthouse that day) 2: The defendant did get this letter that the hearing was cancelled, giving the real reason why he was not there. Then he must have been alerted by some one in the court that I was being heard by the judge, so he then turned up later to make his excuse of being lost. Which for a regular attendee of the court Is something to question. 3: The court & the defendant have fabricated a lie to give exception to the defendant so he has another chance. On top of this I'm made to jump through hoops even had the phone put down on me by team leaders when asking for the name of the court manager when they would not help with forms.. All recorded and logged.. This is just a small part of the unfair treatment I am receiving but I think its one of the most relevant.

Im trying to find a section to help me with a serious Court matter I need to make a complaint about a Court where I have serious concerns where court staff are personally helping the defendant. I am being prevented from getting justice access to clarity from the judges direction and all sorts of delay tack ticks. It may seem to hard to believe but I have good evidence of all this and need some serious advice If there is a topic for this I would like to post more about my attempts to complaint and get justice for theft. Who do you go to to Sue the Courts & police for negligence

Im trying to find a section to help me with a serious Court matter I need to make a complaint about a Court where I have serious concerns where court staff are personally helping the defendant. I am being prevented from getting justice access to clarity from the judges direction and all sorts of delay tack ticks. It may seem to hard to believe but I have evidence of all this and need some serious advice If there is a topic for this I would like to post more about my attempts to complaint and get justice for theft.