![](https://www.cagtest.co.uk/uploads/set_resources_3/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_pattern.png)
Fringer
Registered UsersChange your profile picture
-
Posts
306 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Post article
CAGMag
Blogs
Keywords
Everything posted by Fringer
-
Hi All Another flaming Parking Charge Notice received. Think I've actually followed instructions correctly this time! I need to go and get a photo of the sign in the car park which I will do tonight 1 Date of the infringement 3/10/2022 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 10/10/2022 3 Date received 13/10/2022 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Y 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Number plate photos of entrance and leaving 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] N Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N/A yet as not appealed 7 Who is the parking company? Euro Car Parks 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Jackson Road, Clacton on Sea For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. POPLA
-
Hi again I've just had to have the brakes done again on this car after a strong smell of burning coming from the back wheel I have paid out another £320 to have the back discs and pads replaced, also whilst it was in the garage they called me to say that the battery had become flat, the engine light had come on and the acceleration had ceased. I'm still within 3 months of buying this car!
-
I've had a letter from the legal team stating to go ahead with the claim and they will defend robustly. I had a few days away booked over Christmas and had no car to get there so have had to use the Honda. I also now have no funds to pursue the claim as it will cost me to put the claim in therefore I have had to come to the conclusion that I will have to keep the car and just try to sell it as I do not want anything to do with this guy or his company. I am gutted that he has gotten away with it but I was left in a situation where I had no choice but to use the car or lose the £600 mini break away Thank you for all of your help throughout. It really is appreciated. Happy New Year to you all
-
Do I need to respond to these letters advising I am not accepting or just go ahead and wait until the 21st December and proceed with the court? I also note they say the car passed the MOT on the 3rd November, it didn't - it failed on the 3rd and passed on the 17th - not sure that makes any difference?
-
I have had 2 letters through from the companys 'legal team' We write to you on behalf of the above-named client in response to your letter dated 7 December 2021, the content of which is noted. Please ensure any future correspondence is sent to Lawgistics directly and not our client, save for any service of court proceedings. Your unduly discursive correspondence does not detract from the fundamental fact that the vehicle was fault free at the time of sale, as evidenced by the MOT which passed on 3 November 2021 with no advisories. To be clear, the dangerous an major defects listed on the MOT failure dated 3 November 2021 were promptly repaired. Such repairs resulted in the subsequent MOT pass. Should you wish to question the validity of this MOT, we suggest you contact the DVSA and or the MOT test station concerned. However, our client is confident that the MOT station carried out the MOT and repairs to a satisfactory standard. The repairing garage, Rickarl Motors, has been established for over 30 years and has a reputable reputation with an average google review rating of 4.8/5*. As previously explained, since you have chosen to repair the vehicle on your own accord, you have waived your right to reject the vehicle. Since the vehicle does not currently have any faults present, our client is not liable to accept your rejection of the vehicle As regards the text messages sent after sale, we can confirm that we are in receipt of all text messages. We note you initially stated to have heard a slight knocking noise and your son suggested it could be the anti-roll bar link. You intimated to our client that you would book the vehicle in for a check. Your suggestion that our client’s silence to one text message implies liability is completely without merit. If our client intended to conceal a fault, which he did not, he would not have suggested to take the vehicle for a diagnosis. For the aforementioned reasons, we see no grounds for rejection and our client will not be accepting your rejection. You must do as you see fit. Take notice, any proceedings will be robustly defended and any defamatory comments posted on any online platform will be subject to legal action through the High Court both dated the same day, today Screenshot 2021-12-16 155923-converted.pdf
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
The Consumer Action Group
×
- Create New...
IPS spam blocked by CleanTalk.