Rule No 1 never appeal,  they would be unwise to take a wrong reg further as in law its classed as De Minimis, a trifle as its easy to put a wrong reg if you are driving partner's car, a hire or courtesy car, you paid was no loss so no course of action.

You were a tenant irrespective of the fleecer's Parking T &C's you were unloading goods for your business  therefore are permitted a reasonable time to do so, you were not parked as in leaving a vehicle there to go off away somewhere, as Jopson was stopped to unload as bulky item as was not feasible from an allocated parking space the stop was temporary for the duration of the movement of the goods.

Don't worry too much, Gladstones will have messed up somewhere, they usually do.

The Jopson v Homeguard is extremely important its crucial

Calling the Court is first order of business, if the Claimform went to wrong address there are possibilities that spring from that. Especially if DCBL knew the correct address.

That's definitely a Judgment in default, are you sure they never sent a Letter of Claim? Its Forthwith as well, and assis for that amount, DCBL could get hold of a Writ next month and attend as the Can't Pay We'll take It Away crod and add loads of fees to the Judgment debt.  Await the other team member's they will be along soon.

have they sent an LOC to an old address or anything?  Looks like they might well have a Default Judgment yes upload the letter, something seems odd.

Yes fill in the sticky and upload everything you have from them as a pdf. Do you still have the handwritten note?

Looks like 18 requests to DVLA from OPS, and one from the Bailiffs.

And yours is a Hackney carriage, so exempt from any VCS alleged contract if you stop to pick up or drop off on that route.

Yes snotty letter only and close to the 30 days by post with free proof of posting

what are you going to send,? post it up her first please.

Oh dear, needs some thought there, real shoot in foot time.  How to counter that one is going to take some thought if its possible

make sure your daughter doesn't delete the emeils, in fact print them out if you can and keep copies.

Might have been better rto have sent a copy of the LOC by post with a free proof of posting as well as email for5 completeness..

Ypu need to use that yes, you must never agreee to an On The Paper's hearing as the lies they tell need to be challenged, they could put allsorts in to the court which without a hearing cannot be challenged. the other team members will be along soon to clarify fopr you.

It really is a find the lady 3 card choice.

Simple simon has good reason to be afraid, he lost two cases to EL21

Should focus their tiny minds, however they are so programmed to suing people, they might take a while to realise they have a potential claim going in against them.  That works in your favour if they ignore the LOC.

fill in the details and as DX says upload pdf of the paperwork they have sent, as in everything. 60 minutes to eat in at a Maccy D is a bit too short IMO especially if someone is there with a large family.

.

Gladdys are duplicitous but likely they missed the opportunity to stop judgment  s FTMDave says look at Enforcement as they will try shenanigans.

They will rely on Beavis as to the fairness of the £100 but an I-Pad in a reception isn't really a robust method of entering details of a parked car.

Wrong reg  could be the reason presumably is the car VRM entered into an electronic Terminal at the gym or a written sign in sheet at reception?

I see they have indicated they are adding the Unicorn Feed tax  of £60 to the alleged debt, hmmm again.

The LOC going to them might focus their tiny minds.