Mention of Jopson v Homeguuard as to loading not parking as how else would you be able to bring stock to the premises, just run it past the team what you are going to say get it all tied up neatly and concisely

Think DX's re titling is more accurate now. this is a huge thread to work through.

Plus they get the satisfaction of wrecking someone's credit rating for 6 years, so it matter's not a jot to the person they got a default CCJ on whether they pay after the 30 days or not, if backdoor CCJ Set Aside is relatively simple, so long as a defence to original claim.That then makes the CCJ go away gone wiped.

Set aside and a defence to claimonly way to remove now then

Still best to post it anyway every case is different in some way.

Send them a snail mail Cease and desist with a free proof of posting citing they have ignored your email to correspond by post only,

so the emails are archived and will be used as evidence as will any subsequent emails them may send

Especially if there is something from the school, as the school willcome under the Council, and there might be planning stipulations about school drop off and pick up/parking.

The Jopson case of itself is compelling as normally if you are delivering 20 minutes is a baseline figure at least if you were a courier dropping bikes off at the bike shop so no reason not to apply in some circumstances for an individual such as yourself.

MSE always say appeal I think

Realistically as POFA not satisfied, so long as someone doesn't out themselves as driver in a pointless Appeal, they have nowhere to go however many threats and admin charges,  that cannot be levied on the keeper anyway to their threatograms.

The extra 60 quid could also be their undoing if they do try court.

That could bite them if they have been told no email you have the proof you sent a cease & desist using email, and they still send them, those you save and use later.

Tell them it has gone in now

Really should have been posted as pdf not typed into the post.

They have nowhere to go to realistically ground a claim with this.

Absolutely no need to send 2 forms of ID to fleecers Ctax bill more than enough. the clock is ticking for them after 30 days you can do something to them if you wish.

You don not appeal to do so is pointless |Parking Fleecer's always turn appeals down, also any court action they might unwisely take would as LFI indicated fail due to non compliance with POFA so long as they don't know whowas driving.  there will be other issues fatal to their case likely inadequate signage with T & C's hidden in a font size you need a magnifying glass to read.

Basically you will get some ever more threatening letters some from a powerless paper tiger DCA  they might even add £60 Debt Collection Charge, something expressly forbidden  to try to scrape from the keeper. indeendt was something that was highlighted in PE's favourite case Beavis where it was decided the sum demanded included cost of recovery, so any additional charges abuse of process.

You sit on your hands until a Letter Of Claim  arrives.  meanwhile get pictures of the signage at entrance and around the car park in case are ever needed.

You have been submitting monthly meter readings if not a (not so) Smart meter?  Just to make sure they aren't chasing assumed debt as in estimated bills? Asking just for completeness.

If you have already had a similar claim from them kicked out, and you are prepared to see it all through, please keep us updated.

 so hopefully it will be EPS You have been Gladstoned.

Agree FTM Dave Counterclaim is a double edged sword,and can cause multiple issues.

Its pointless going round in circles respond to them, at this point you have nothing to lose.

They are hoping to get round GDPR, once they cough up or if they get silly inform ICO about vexatious application to DVLA and unlawful; processing of your data perhaps.

Looks like they cut their own throat,

Looks like as they appealed to Smart, and POPLA likely they have outed themselves.