Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

carter Statutory Demand for Egg debt **CLAIM DROPPED**


linz2011
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6081 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I have just received a stat demand which was delivered by courier from Bryan Carter for Egg - I have rung them and they will not discuss it with me and said a bankruptcy order is going ahead and the only way I can stop this is full payment £14k - if not received they will make me bankrupt????

 

Please help

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 122
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

This you will need to get set aside, on the grounds that you dispute at least part of the debt due to unlawful charges. CCA and SAR Smegg (via Bryan Carter)and bring evidence that you have done this to the set aside hearing. If you are very lucky they may back off at this request but Smegg normally manage to produce something that will pass as an agreement. Are you a home owner?

"Why CCJ when you can CCA!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes I am a homeowner, they issued a County court claim months ago which I disputed and they sent me a letter saying they are no longer going ahead as long as I make a suitable arrangement - I did and missed a couple of payments then received this?

 

I feel sick.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah but I have just bloody signed for the stat demand and they now have my signature - i already have a SAR pending with Egg shall I just send the CCA to Bryan Carter and do I then need to apply to have the stat demand set aside?

 

thanks very much for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

shall I just send the CCA to Bryan Carter and do I then need to apply to have the stat demand set aside?

 

thanks very much for your help

 

Yes on both counts. Don't gamble on the CCA solving the problem but hopefully it will. As long as you convince the court that a triable issue exists you will get a set aside. Carters are probably trying to panic you into taking out a secured loan to pay them off.

"Why CCJ when you can CCA!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to clarify a little. If you can only show that the debt on the stat demand is disputed in part they will still be able to proceed to bankruptcy on any undisputed part of the debt over £750. A set aside is not usually granted unless the whole debt is disputed.

 

The other way to avoid bankruptcy is to offer security for the debt - i.e. let them secure it against your house (and you will see that the stat demand states that the debt is unsecured and undisputed). As long as this was linked to a payment plan agreement it might be suitable. You cannot be made bankrupt for a secured debt (unless the creditor releases the security first).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gizmo

 

I have £50k equity and about £80K unsecured debt - nothing secured on the property

 

thanks

 

Is this all in your sole name?

 

does anyone have any idea on the timescales what the procedure is etc

 

thanks

 

The link I gave above has some good stuff in it.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After the statutory demand has been served (and not challeneged), they can (after 3 weeks) issue you (and the court) with a creditor's petition for bankruptcy proceedings.

 

*IMPORTANT*

 

You can please tell me more about the court judgement, there might be something we can do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sequenci - the ccj was issued for about £700 but the debt is £14k - it came from Bryan Carter and I just logged on via MCOL (this was all prior to me knowing about CAG) and just wrote I have no idea what this debt is for and would appreciate more information. Then received a letter saying they were not pursuing it and if I come to a satisfactory arrangment that would be fine?

Link to post
Share on other sites

In which case your hausband owns half of the equity anyway - if they ywent ahead and made you BR - there would by my calculations be around £21-22K to share over £80k worth of debt - either way they are not going to get anywhere near their full amount.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you sent a CCA request? if not do it today. Ask for the notice of assignment also.

 

There is a good argument with regard to the fact that they already have taken action via the county court for part of this debt. I would raise that it is unfair that they are now taking additional action via bankruptcy proceedings when they have already obtained the judgment. It is totally against the overiding objective. By virtue of this, you feel that there is a significant injustice caused and yout cannot under reasonably understand the true position between yourself and the creditor. This therefore means that you feel that the demand doesn't comply with the Insolvency Rules 1986.

 

If you cannot stop the stat demand, all is not lost.

 

If you have made an offer to secure or compound for the debt (offered to pay in instalments), and the creditor has unreasonably refused it, it could be considered unfair for the bankruptcy to be granted. The onus would be on you to prove that the debt was unreasonable refused – the offer would have to be realistic and practicable. A creditor is entitled to consider their own interests, but a rigid application of an organisation’s policies could amount to “institutional unreasonableness” . Please bear in mind that this action TOTALLY goes against the OFT's guidance on debt collection and I would challenge this to be institutional unreasonableness.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...