Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

The MP's campaign-Responses


moneyhelp
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5942 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Emailed Angela Smith (Labour MP For Basildon & Thurrock)PPS (&nbsp, Prime Minister's Office (since 23 Jul 2007) (havent got a clue what her job involves in parliment)

 

OPPS sorry for the double post.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have posted a link to this trhead on the Abbey forum asking everyone to write to their mp using the brilliant letter on here and let everyone know who the MP is that they have written to, so that we can try and send letters to all the current MP's

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

If they think the Thames would look better pink, with Flamingos floating on it rather than boats, then they damn well say it!

 

Peter

 

 

HEE hee, I like it.

 

I have emailed my local MEP's as well they are

Jeffrey Titford,

Christopher Beazley,

Richard Howitt

Geoffrey Van Orden,

Robert Sturdy,

Tom Wise

Andrew Duff

Link to post
Share on other sites

***Received this from one of my MEP’s******, at least they are responding, even if they cannot help, they at least point you in the right direction.

Dear xxxxxxx

Thank you for your e-mail

I understand and sympathise with what you have said but unfortunately as an MEP I do not have any jurisdiction as to what happens in this country, but, I strongly advise you to make contact with your MP and Local Office of Fair trading and state your case. You can contact the Office of Fair Trading on enquiries@oft.gsi.gov.uk or your MP who is Angela Smith MP, Constituency House, Cornwallis House, Howard Chase, Basildon, SS14 3BB or gordonl@parliament.uk or flack@parliament.uk

Best wishes

Tom

Tom Wise

UK Independence Party MEP for the Eastern Region

Also, the emails I sent to Angela Smith Labour MP for Basildon from both me and my husband, have been read by her office, just waiting to see now if she is personally given the emails or whether they have been filed under “B”.

When we send a complaint to the OFT regarding the waiver, can someone point me in the right direction as to what letter we are sending them. Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is great everyone, lets keep it up, try and post this thread on every reply you to in all your subscribed threads. Bet the banks and FSA/OFT didnt bank on this happening, great to see us Brits know how to stick together

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I put this up on M Lewis's site. NOT ONE! NOT ONE has bothered.

Some people on this thread are doing a bl***y marvellous job!

I just don't understand we we are not getting the 'joining togehter of like minded souls' :rolleyes:

 

 

DOS

 

I PM'd Martin Lewis at lunchtime and this is the response I have got.

 

Hi

 

Im working a slightly different way _ I plan to launch the bank charges customer charter - which i know is on CAG and will then speak to MPs once that's settled

 

martin smile.gif[/end quote]

 

We claimants will keep the flag flying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have PM'd people and have even put a thread in the abbey forum asking people to look in the general section and not just their bank forum, a few have listened and have now subscibed, we need help from the MOD's to spread the good word even further, we cannot do this ourselves without physically going into every bank forum. it is so frustrating isnt it?

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the message I have received from Cllr Linda Williams (didn’t really know whether local councillors had any clout, but thought it wouldn’t hurt to send it to them as well).

 

 

Dear xxxxxx

You have my full support as I think that the whole situation is iniquitous

and the banking world will try to ensure that they carry on making the

obscene levels of profit in one way or another.

 

 

Linda Williams

 

I also received this today from Steve Marshall.

 

]Dear xxxxxxx

 

thank you for your letter

 

]The basic issue seems to be the need for a definitive ruling on whether or not the charges are unlawful. In principle, the banks cannot be expected to behave as if a ruling exists, until it does

 

However, in situations where the economic power on one side of an argument is vastly disproportional to that on the other, there is a real possibility of injustice occurring simply as a result of the time taken, and I will certainly make this point to the appropriate authorities

 

As far as the Human Rights dimension is concerned, it is the UK Act which is relevant at present. There can be no recourse to the European Court until all stages of the UK process have been exhausted. To achieve this you would need access to specialist legal advice, so the best approach is undoubtedly via one of the pressure groups established to help people take on the banks

 

The Court, incidentally, is not an EU institution, but depends on the Council of Europe. Britain’s adherence to the Convention came via the Council of Europe, and pre-dates our entry into the EU

 

Steve Marshall

Casework Officer to Andrew Duff

Liberal Democrat MEP to the East of England

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just received the following encouraging reply from a researcher to Evan Harris. Does anyone have a link to the Times article? Let's keep the pressure on!

 

Muggy

 

"

Dear Richard,

 

I shall bring the matter to the attention of Dr Harris. Your letter makes an excellent case for the bank customers. Could you send me a copy of the article from The Times 27/07 which you refer to – if you are unable to do this I could try and find it myself.

 

Yours,

 

Nat"

 

Link to article Watchdog accuses banks of lying over charges - Times Online

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Macboy is in agreement, if we receive a reply from an MP, Local councillor or MP that agree with our cause, we could PM him the details for a list to be compliled.

 

I wasnt sure whether local councillors had an clout, but it might we worth lobbying them aswell. the more the merrier in our corner I say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This has just been posted, looks like the cases at southend are all going to be stayed (as per my letter received last week0, so my order wont be far away in the post.

 

if the judge has used his own initiative to stay the claims i cannot see that he will lift the stays, if people do object.

 

 

icon1.gif Re: Claims transferred to Southend...

Through the post this morning from Southend Court

 

Upon Proceedings having been issued in the High Court to determine the legality or otherwise of Bank Charges;

 

Before District Judge Dudley sitting at Southend County Court at Tylers House, etc.

 

An Upon it to the Court that this claim will be affected by the outcome of those proceedings;

IT IS ORDERED THAT

 

1. This claim be stayed until determination of the proceedings in the High Court.

2. Liberty to either party to apply on notice under CPR23 to lift the stay

3. The hearing of any application to lift the stay be reserved to District Judge Dudley

 

This order was made of the courts own initiave pursuant to CPR Part 3.3(4). You may apply to set aside, vary or stay Order but such application mustbe made within 7 days of receiving it.

 

 

Comments please, one and all, seems I got the first Southend Letter again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

here are mine then so far

 

Tom Wise

UK Independence Party MEP for the Eastern Region

 

Cllr Linda Williams (lib dem for basildon)

 

 

Steve Marshall

Casework Officer to Andrew Duff

Liberal Democrat MEP to the East of England

 

NOTE 2 ARE LIB DEMS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:D Sorry, for a minute I thought you had put Flydale and not Ryedale, made me think of a little blue box (oh how we could do with that at the moment).

 

keep up the good work, good to see that people are emailing and the MP's are responding. I have sent a follow up email to Andrew Duff MEP (he contacted me last week) he has read the email, just waiting on response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I actually received a response from an MEP that wishes to help.

 

Dear xxxxxxx

 

Thank you for your email dated 6th August 2007, addressed to Jeffrey Titford

MEP. Mr Titford has asked me to reply on his behalf.

 

May I firstly apologise for taking a while to reply but we have had a very

large postbag and your email arrived during the holiday season, when we were

short staffed. However, I have now read your email with great interest and

can certainly understand your frustrations. We would certainly be willing

to write to the Chief Executive of the Financial Services Authority, on your

behalf, to point out to them the misery that they are causing. Before doing

that, I would be very interested to know if any of the other politicians

that you wrote to at the same time, have done the same thing. Naturally, we

are anxious to avoid duplication. Equally, if there have been any further

developments as a result of the activities of the other MEPs, it would be

useful to know the details.

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Stuart Gulleford

Political Advisor to Jeffrey Titford MEP

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...