Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Let me introduce myself


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6550 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I work for a major Bank - but you must appreciate that, and I am confident that this applies to all staff of UK financial institutions, whether they know it or not, that any participation in a messageboard like this would lead to instant dismissal. In fact I believe that the actual rule is so Draconian that setting up a webpage about my dog would require formal permission. Any who work for a Bank and offer advice should, therefore, always be cautious, but never allow arrogant bullying tactics to deter you - as you see, it hasn't stopped me, and I am moderating on another financial forum elsewhere :-D and I have also actively engaged in claims against Banks - so clearly they have nothing to hide :rolleyes:

 

I have no claim to pursue, and no particular axe to grind, and would only seek to offer assistance, where I can, and an insight into things which may come as a surprise to some, and a shock to others. I, thankfully, don't work in an area involved in dealing with accounts (sorry, can't be more specific for reasons mentioned) and have been dumbfounded by the obscenity of some of the cases described on this forum, and it has prompted me to join.

 

Do Bank's scan these forums ?

 

I would be fairly confident that they do. They have media departments who scan for all news articles and reports that may impact on their and other Bank's profiles. I do not imagine that they would be looking at individual cases, more trying to get some overall perspective on tactics and customer attitudes - so it must be pretty depressing reading for them. It is not something to be scared by, and as has been said, the formula works , so their scanning the forum is unlikely to provide them with a 'magic key' defence - just one caveat - don't provide them with insight into your own weakness such as being desperate to settle early.

 

If you claim say £2,000 and this case lands on the desk of an exec and he can get you to settle for £1,500 then he earns a big tick, even though the Bank loses £1,500. If you have set aside claims for other charges it would then be interesting to use any such offer as a prompt to claim the rest - that would make him rush a little more to conclude the original offer more quickly. His interest is purely selfish - if you settle for less he gets a tick - if you get what you want he loses nothing - if his intervention makes the claim grow he gets his aaaaaa*** kicked.

 

I hope I can be of some assistance. I have seen Bank responses in various threads which sound bizarre and I imagine are just plain lies, and there are some general issues such as Bank's fear of regulatory infractions and Basel II :eek: - now there's a nasty thing to say to a Banker. Can't provide account transaction details ? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operational_risk#Examples - sound like a Basel II non-compliance issue for them to deal with.

 

Knowledge is power - use it.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...