obvious v itcsales.co.uk *** I WON ***

[Rich44]

Apart from print out all your emails and file them in date order just in case have you still got any of the PDAs to use as an example?

 

Just general stuff like that, get your facts in chronological order to help you in court etc and good luck

[Rich44]

Nicely laid out and clear enough to read at least that makes your defence easy to put together, there are more knowledable people on here who can advise you on how to word things etc and good luck with it.

[Rich44]

I agree very nice what court couldnt be impressed with that

[Rich44]

not to mention the bit where he totally ignores you saying they started to ignore you AND not to mention that the goods were not as described lol

[Rich44]

You'll need the evidence though rather than just some peoples say so, so might be worth asking the various admins of the sites to let you have the IP logs lol

[Rich44]

Giving misleading information and not to mention acting in a child like fashion would put a rather large dent in their credibility though IF you could prove it was said company which is probably impossible esp if an employee posted from their home and it wasnt posted by a fixed IP address you couldnt prove it anyway again it would be balance of probabilities and a judge wouldnt be interested

[Rich44]

The "evidence" I was referring to wasnt that ACTUAL posts it was the IP logs of the person posting I wasnt attempting to show that the posts themselves were legally binding at all, merely that if the OP intended to try and use them in court he would need the evidence to prove his claim that ITC had posted them.

 

Besides its about showing that you are have been reasonable about trying to settle before heading off to court and showing that you are the more credible person so you are believed hence the OP seeing if there is anything here he can use hence logs as evidence thats all.

 

As for the legalility of bringing any of this before a court thats beyond anything I could or would advise on anyway but having all of that to hand just in case even if you cannot use it can only be a good thing.

 

As I said earlier tho proving that was someone from ITC will probably be impossible anyway so the whole argument is void

[Rich44]

You are missing the point I wasnt saying that what has been posted here would be admissable in court I was saying that IF you were going to attempt that then you would need the evidence to back up your assertation ie the IP logs.

 

As for being reasonable I wasnt again ascertaining whether he was being reasonable or not however IF you could prove ITC made those comments 110% (which he cant) then their credibility would be shot thats all I was getting at.

 

Again im not saying who is being reasonable (im not the judge lol) BUT if everything in this thread is true and the ascertation that TBoner is from ITC then it shows how low a company will sink to try and get their own way and influence someone into giving up their rights.

 

Im not actually arguing with you re submitting to court at all, in fact I was agreeing with you that it would probably be inadmissable as theres no real way to prove that the posts came from ITC as I doubt they are big enough to have their own block of IP addresses to which you could do a reverse look up and prove it came from their offices (regardless of who posted it from there) I suspect it will either be a static IP address on an ADSL line or just a dynamic one either way as far as mere mortals are concerned its untraceable past the generic ISP in question and to get any further would involve considerable expense and time which would be totally worthless