Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

allen V's A&L


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5844 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi jmn

My notice of transfer said the same thing but when i spoke to a gentleman at the court he asked how much my claim was for and when i told him £5000+ he said the judge would more than likely request one! so if your claim is for less you may not have to fill one in:)

I spoke to them yesterday too and they told me that there is a good couple of weeks back log, so even when i send this questionaire back ive still got to wait a few weeks til i receive a court date.

Any one know if i need to get any paper work ready to send with it, ive sent copies of my charges to both the court and to wraggs but unsure if i need to send anything else with the questionaire??

 

Good luck jmn keep me posted:D

 

It used to the case that, if your claim was over £1,500, you had to fill in an AQ, if below, you did not. I'm not sure if this is still the case, but always wise to ring the court and ask out of courtesy, plus you normally have only 14 days to pay it. It's also a good idea to make contact with the court, as you'll probably have to ring them again a number of times.:wink:

A-Z CAG links to all documents you'll need for

your claim

(Thanks to Michael Brown for all his efforts)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-forums-website-questions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 173
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

:| :| :| seem to be having bother filling out this allocations questionaire, in section f do i just send a copy of my charges? if so should i include what there for i.e failed direct debit?

Or do i just send a copy of the draft thats listed in the allocation questionaires guide in the forums templates?

sorry i must be really dumb cus im getting so confused!

NEED YOUR HELP!!!!!!

 

Don't know if you've seen this link but, if not, it will hopefully answer your questions :-

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/11644-allocation-questionnaires-guide-completion.html

 

Mimi

A-Z CAG links to all documents you'll need for

your claim

(Thanks to Michael Brown for all his efforts)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-forums-website-questions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Yep, agree with everyone. My "final" nudge letter was still asking for the full amount, but I'm holding out for "judgement by default" for Wragges not submitting their papers in time, so being brave (not stupidly I hope:rolleyes:).

 

Good luckicon7.gif

  • Haha 1

A-Z CAG links to all documents you'll need for

your claim

(Thanks to Michael Brown for all his efforts)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-forums-website-questions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

It's here :-

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/17065-application-removal-stay-updated.html

 

It would be a good idea for you to put the A-Z in my signature into your favourites ... so usefulicon12.gif

 

Mimiicon7.gif

A-Z CAG links to all documents you'll need for

your claim

(Thanks to Michael Brown for all his efforts)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-forums-website-questions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck with everything Janicon7.gif Hope you get your stay "lifted" eventually.

 

I've actually never read of Wragge submitting any court documents (has anybody?), probably due in the main to the courts asking them to declare why their "charges" are not penalties:rolleyes: Everyone seems to be winning by default or taking any early settlementicon10.gif

 

Mimi x

A-Z CAG links to all documents you'll need for

your claim

(Thanks to Michael Brown for all his efforts)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-forums-website-questions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't appeal until you've received the info. from the courts. No harm in ringing them.icon7.gif

 

Mimi

A-Z CAG links to all documents you'll need for

your claim

(Thanks to Michael Brown for all his efforts)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-forums-website-questions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

I found that I got differing answers from the court to any questions ... it depends who you get and how harrassed they are at the time:rolleyes:

 

Personally I would not pre-empt anything by sending a letter just yet ... you don't want to rock the boat with the judge at all and risk putting his nose out of joint!

 

If each case is being looked at separately, I'd hold fire and see what happens IMHO. If your case is then "stayed", you can always apply to have it removed.

 

Mimiicon7.gif

A-Z CAG links to all documents you'll need for

your claim

(Thanks to Michael Brown for all his efforts)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-forums-website-questions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not as far as I know. I'd just go ahead as normal. A 'phone call to the court wouldn't do any harm though as it's understandable you'll want to be prepared.

 

Mimiicon7.gif

A-Z CAG links to all documents you'll need for

your claim

(Thanks to Michael Brown for all his efforts)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-forums-website-questions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

Here you go :-

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/17065-application-removal-stay-updated.html#post1046820

 

To be honest, I haven't heard of anyone being successful yet (apart from some folks at Hull court). Must be some more successes soon:rolleyes:

 

Good luckicon7.gif

 

Mimi x

A-Z CAG links to all documents you'll need for

your claim

(Thanks to Michael Brown for all his efforts)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-forums-website-questions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...