Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PPI won't pay out for my morgage - help please!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6332 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I have been busy chasing bank charges and have now decied to try if anyone can help me out with my PPI.

 

I have PPI with Payment Sheild. here's my story - changed my morgage december 05 took out new PPI for morgage Jan 06 got told end of Feb company re-structure but it may not impact on me. Told me May that my role was redundent. Payment sheild have a 90 day claws - so although I was not told until May that I was not getting made redundent because I was told in Febuary that their was a company restructure they are not going to pay out.

 

To make matters worse we set up a policy on line and took one out over the phone with them too because we didn't think it had worked. As it turned out they had set up two policys up and were charging us twice and then wouldn't pay out.

 

As we say in Scotland I probally don't have a hope in hell but it is worth 1,500 per month and I am still not working and my husband has just lost his job. PPI was just out in my name at that time.

 

Any advice would be welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Told me May that my role was redundent. Payment sheild have a 90 day claws - so although I was not told until May that I was not getting made redundent because I was told in Febuary that their was a company restructure they are ...."

 

 

Bit confused here - first you say you were told of redundancy in May, then you go on to say you weren't told until May that you were NOT getting made redundant. Could you clarify?

 

Also, how does the insurance company know that you were told about re-structuring back in the February?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I was told in Feb company re-structure. However not told that my role was getting made redundent until may. Insurance company wrote to my company and asked when their was any comunication about any changes. They told them Feb. However confirmed that I was not made redundent or told until May. It was a large scale restructure and involved people in different sites and more that 100 people so they had to give us notice in Feb.

 

I feel annoyed because if I had worked for a small company and handn't got made redundent until may then they would have payed out due to the timescales involved in large scale redundencies. Does this make sence?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - got your PM. No probs!

For starters, you've made a smart move coming on to this site.

 

I have issues with their 90 days' clause. You weren't made redundant in Feb. you were made redundant in May. It really depends on what the Terms & Conditions are of your policy. Now mine says

 

"you became UNEMPLOYED within 90 days of the START DATE (with a bit of luck, it was past 90 days when you were made redundant) or at the START DATE you knew you were to become unemployed" (well you didn't, because you weren't told of the restructuring until Feb and your policy started in Jan)

However, that's mine not yours - but do look at the policy wording carefully.

 

Are you pursuing with them the fact that you're paying for 2 identical policies?

 

I can't really be of much more help, as I'm no expert in this - hopefully someone will come along shortly who is.

 

If you don't get any more constructive help, my best advice is to get down to your local Citizen's Advice Bureau a.s.a.p. - they are usually good at this type of stuff. I hope you get this sorted out, and please keep posting on here to let us know how things are progressing.

 

 

If I have been of any help, please click the scales in the bottom left hand corner. Thanks!

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...