Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

EricTheRed v Abbey


EricTheRed
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1930 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Clearly some decision making for you then....

 

In the first instance, you could try to get them to withdraw the charges, pointing them to the fact you will be shortly taking legal action to recover existing charges etc etc.

 

A long shot, but the price of a phone call......

 

The biggest decision comes from deciding whether or not to leave money in your account that would otherwise be taken by these new charges. Leaving it in will mean the money is swallowed up, you have to wait longer to go to court and thus wait longer to get your money back.

 

Taking it out will mean that you are likely to exceed your overdraft limit (?) but you will be able to start proceedings, probably by paying cash directly to the court rather than online, but you should then see the matter resolved much quicker.

 

Clearly, it would be unwise of me to advise you to take the second route - I just wanted to clarify your potential options....

  • Haha 1

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Some people are currently claiming, but as this is quite new I don't think they have reached settlement yet.

 

If you have not received the full charge details from the bank, you are advised to issue the DPA Non-compliance LBA and give 7 days notice of court action for that.

 

If still no reply, issue the N1 Court claim for the breach of DPA and then issue a court claim for monies based on estimates.

 

I.E. - You have 12 months of charges, equalling £300

 

6 years x £300 would be £1800, so that would be your best estimate until you are informed of correct charges by the bank.

 

DPA letters are in the Templates Library.

 

Does that help any?

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ALL THREADS MERGED - AND RETITLED FOR CLARITY

Please try to keep anything that could be related to your claim in this thread.

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

My guess is that they wouldn't take any legal action (in the short term) for recovery of the overdraft. Far more likely would be that they will issue a Default Notice requiring you to repay in 28 days, with the threat of marking your credit files.

 

Should that happen, you would need to write and formally make them aware the amount is in dispute.

 

As well as the path above (from Seminole) yo might be best placed to issue a Section 10 Notice from the Template Library. They have 21 days to respond to it, and failue to reply in time leaves them open to further action. The Sec.10 effectively states that 'although I agreed you could put info on my credit files, I never agreed to you putting incorrect info on them' - that type of thing.

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1930 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...