Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Parking Eye ANPR PCN - HOME BARGAINS CROSSHANDS - PE ignore Stores Instruction to Cancel Invoice. Whats my best cause of action?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 481 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Could I have some advice on how to reply to a Final Demand letter from Private Parking Company.

 

The complication here is that the land owner, who have been amazingly supportive have told the Private Parking Company to cancel the invoice several times. They would have had the first instruction from the store owner way before the POPLA appeal.

 

The back story.

I am the registered keeper and not the driver.

The driver was 8 months pregnant and felt sick so pulled off the road, 1st car park was said store.

The store was closed.

They stayed in the car park while working out if safe to drive or if they needed to call for help.

As the store was closed, the Private Parking Company sent the registered keeper an invoice.

 

19/7/22 – Invoice sent.

23/7/22 – Spoke to Store and was told to come back in the week to talk to Dept or Store manager.

23/7/22 – Sent an appeal to Private Parking Company via Appealmyticket, so that the appeal deadline would not be missed.

27/7/22 – Store messaged me confirmation they had ticket cancelled.

29/9/22 – Appealmyticket contacted me to say that their appeal had failed and that the POPLA appeal had also failed. I contacted the stored again to tell them that Private Parking Company had ignored their instructions to cancel and could they sort it out again.

30/9/22 – Store confirmation that the manager had again told the Private Parking Company to cancel.

 

Everything goes quiet, so the we all thought, including the store that the matter was closed.

 

Then out of the blue I get a Final Notice increasing the fee to £100 and 14days to pay.

I went back to the store and the manager, again very very helpful, apologetic and supportive again emailed Private Parking Company telling them to cancel the invoice.

 

Private Parking Company replied to the store manager who forwarded me their response:

 

“Unfortunately there is nothing I can do regarding this PCN as the motorist had appealed to POPLA (Parking on Private Land Appeals) who are the independent and impartial ombudsmen for the industry.

 

Based on the evidence provided by both parties, POPLA upheld the decision made by Parkingeye and the motorist must pay the PCN.

 

All POPLA decisions are final, and motorists are always made aware of this by POPLA at the time of making the appeal – if the decision is made in favour of the motorist, then Parkingeye must cease to pursue and conversely if the decision is made in favour of Parkingeye the motorist must follow the procedure accordingly.”

 

How do I best reply to the Final Notice and how do I advice the store to reply to the above statement?

 

I am not naming the Store because they have been extremely helpful thus far and I do not want them to be put off from helping other drivers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 Date of the infringement 14/7/22

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 19/7/22

 

3 Date received Can Not recall
 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Not sure I only have a scan of the front of the page now (as I thought this had been cancelled by the store, I will try and find the orignal)
 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes
 

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Yes
 

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Yes
 

7 Who is the parking company? Parking-Eye

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Home Bargains, Crosshands, Wales
 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.

BPA

If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here. A Final Notice, after the store have confirmed several times they have instructed the parking company to cancel it.  Text and Emails from the store confirming and showing their attempts to tell Parking Eye to cancel the invoice.

 

Here is the POPLA appeal. 

 

As I understand the POPLA appeal had to be appealed on a matter of law and the contract or lack of contract of entering the land.  The emergency pregnancy issue of the driver would not be taken into account with the appeal with Parking-Eye or POPLA

 

The actual reason for stopping on the land was given to the land owner / store manager immediately, eg pregnant person feeling ill and they fully supported this and gave retrospective consent for parking on the land. 

 

One thing POPLA fails to account for is that it was night time and dark, either way that last thing a pregnant person who is feeling ill and worried is going to do is start looking at signage. 

 

Attached is the POPLA.

 

2023-02-10 PE final notice.pdf

2022-07-19 PE PCN event 2022-07-14.pdf

Popla Assessment & decision.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Parking Eye ANPR PCN - HOME BARGAINS CROSSHANDS - PE ignore Stores Instruction to Cancel Invoice. Whats my best cause of action?

Thanks, yes I did pay Appealmyticket.  I have the original email that I sent to appealmyticket that explains to them about the medical emergency.  I also recorded all my conversations with the store that explains the medical emergency to them. The store were 100% aware of the pregnancy issue from day 1.

 

I still don’t understand why parking eye think they have the right to ignore their clients (the store) institutions to cancel the ticket?  The store do not support this going to court.

Edited by dx100uk
unnecessary post quote removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...