Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Taking Ebay UK to court over item sold and then ebay returns money to buyer


frustrated1972
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 539 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Forum,

This is my first post.

On the 12th June 2022 I sold a Jaeger Lecoultre ‘Compass’ Camera to an Ebay buyer in Australia for the amount of £2500.

The buyer paid through Ebay payments on the 12th June, the total amount of £2519 which included the charge to send the Camera to Australia.

The description on Ebay of the camera was added to whilst the auction was running which answered some questions I had received -

‘To answer some questions.
The Lens barrels do fully open and lock as required
The Spirit level is complete and working
The Filters and Stops all work.
The only thing I have been unable to do is to get the shutter to work.
I don’t know if I’m doing it correctly or if it needs a bit of work.
I have wound the wheel that works the shutter and it does ‘wind up’.

The Camera was sent to the buyer in Australia and was received by him soon after.

 

On the 3rd July 2022 I received a message from the buyer saying he had received the camera but was not happy with the fact that the shutter was not working correctly, he considered it a major fault and asked if I had any suggestions to rectify the problem.

 

I replied to his message informing him that the shutter issue was mentioned in the description, to which he replied on the 5th July that he ‘didn’t see the additional description’.

 

He offered to get the camera looked at by his camera repairer or post it back for a full refund.

 

At this point I was not prepared to offer him a refund as I had mentioned the issues with the camera clearly, and he had admitted ‘not reading the description‘.

I suggested he contact Ebay and go through the process of resolution.  I have had no further contact with the buyer.

 

On the 13th July 2022, 15:46, I received a message from Ebay informing me that Ebay were ‘stepping in’ to resolve the return, and that Ebay were going to take a look at the case.   

 

On the 13th July at 16:44 I received a message from Ebay, what I assume is a standard email explaining what happens when a buyer ‘receives the wrong item, it arrives damaged or doesn’t match the items description‘, None of which apply to this item.

 

Ebay stated in that message that you were placing the request on hold for four days to ‘give me time to arrange return shipping with the buyer’.

 

I contacted eBay straight away and spoke to a representative outlining my concerns and also that I had done nothing wrong with regards to mis-selling or misdescribing this camera.   

 

The representative implied that she understood my concerns and that Ebay would listen to them.

 

At 16:46 on the same day I received another message from Ebay telling me that the case was ‘temporarily placed on hold’ and that they would get back to me with an update by 18th July 2022.  

 

At this stage as unhappy as I was, I had assumed that you were going to give me a chance at least to explain this case to somebody in Ebay and therefore I did as they said and waited for them to get in touch by the 18th July.

 

I heard nothing more from Ebay until the 20th July when I received a message saying the ‘case is now closed’ and that Ebay had issued the buyer with a full refund of £2519'.

 

At no point from the 18th July, to 20th July was I contacted by Ebay.   

 

When I did receive the message that you had refunded him I was completely at a loss with knowing what to do.    I contacted Ebay and was put in touch with the High Value Claims Department.    I spoke to a representative who told me that as I had not sent a label back to the buyer for return postage, the case had been closed.   Ebay also told me there was nothing more that they could do and that their ‘hands were tied’ with regards to this case.


Ebay suggested that I send the buyer a return label, which would have cost me £20 or so, and that hopefully he might return it.   I was not prepared to lose anymore money on the off chance he might or might not decide to return it.

 

Ebay suggested that I try messaging him to see if he would return it, they said if I had no response from him, then Ebay might try messaging the buyer.  He did not respond and therefore  nothing more Ebay could  do.   Ebay  also told me that as he had a good record, then they had no reason to believe he was acting unscrupulously.

 

I have messaged the buyer in Australia three times, and have had no response from him.   My view being that he’s very happy to have kept the camera and to have had his money handed back to him, with no intention of returning it.

 

That, I hope outlines, what has happened.

 

At no point during this process have I had the opportunity to argue against this outcome.   Ebay has not listened to my concerns and I am disgusted by the way Ebay have refused to get involved.  

 

Ebay have allowed the buyer to keep the camera and have returned him his money.

 

I consider the timeline of messaging to have been confusing and unclear.    Had I not received your message informing me of the case going on hold, then I would have, ‘under protest’, sent a return label back.

 

 

I have now initiated a small claim against Ebay and, and they have passed it on to a solicitor in Plymouth.

 

The solicitor has sent me a huge email with various pages of legal jargon which I do not understand at all.

 

Does anyone here think I have a chance in taking on the Ebay overlords?

 

Thank you anyone.....

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am private seller on Ebay.  

 

Im not trying to be difficult but I dont know what you mean by 'letter of claim'.

 

Do you mean the initial letter that I sent to ebay informing them of my intention to take them to court?

 

I have not tried to get the payment reversed from the bank, as that still leave a substantial amount they took from my seller account

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am a personal seller, not a business account although I fail to see how that in any way matters with the way Ebay have acted.

How is it fair that they have allowed a buyer to keep the goods and give him his money?  

I do sell items on ebay regularly.

I will contact my bank and see if they are prepared to help.

 

I also dont know if it was DD from my account, I am not sure what authorisation you need to give ebay to have an account

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I have not had any advice at all.  

The reason I have let it drag for so long is that I have had a lot of correspondence with Ebay n the hope they would see sense.   That was why I did not contact my bank.

I have no knowledge of the legal issues, and also what I should or should not have done.

I was left with the only option being small claims as I assumed they were there for low value claims without the need for a solicitor.

Thank you for your help and I guess the fight still goes on.

Regards

P

Link to post
Share on other sites

The camera was listed as faulty.   The buyer admitted when he received it he had not read the description.

 

PART OF MY LETTER TO EBAY

 

On the 12th June 2022 I sold a Jaeger Lecoultre ‘Compass’ Camera to Ebay buyer Jun Wang (username - art.cameras) for the amount of £2500.

 

The buyer paid through Ebay payments on the 12th June, the total amount of £2519 which included the charge to send the Camera to Australia.

 

I would like to add at this point that the description on Ebay of the camera was added to whilst the auction was running which answered some questions I had received -

 

To answer some questions.
The Lens barrels do fully open and lock as required
The Spirit level is complete and working
The Filters and Stops all work.
The only thing I have been unable to do is to get the shutter to work.
I don’t know if I’m doing it correctly or if it needs a bit of work.
I have wound the wheel that works the shutter and it does ‘wind up
’.

 

The Camera was sent to the buyer Mr. Wang in Australia and was received by him soon after.

 

On the 3rd July 2022 I received a message from the buyer saying he had received the camera but was not happy with the fact that the shutter was not working correctly, he considered it a major fault and asked if I had any suggestions to rectify the problem.

 

I replied to his message informing him that the shutter issue was mentioned in the description, to which he replied on the 5th July that he ‘didn’t see the additional description’.

 

He offered to get the camera looked at by his camera repairer or post it back for a full refund.

 

At this point I was not prepared to offer him a refund as I had mentioned the issues with the camera clearly, and he had admitted ‘not reading the description‘. I suggested he contact Ebay and go through the process of resolution.  I have had no further contact with the buyer.

 

On the 13th July 2022, 15:46, I received a message from Ebay informing me that Ebay were ‘stepping in’ to resolve the return, and that Ebay were going to take a look at the case.   

 

On the 13th July at 16:44 I received a message from Ebay, what I assume is a standard email explaining what happens when a buyer ‘receives the wrong item, it arrives damaged or doesn’t match the items description‘, None of which apply to this item.

 

Ebay stated in that message that you were placing the request on hold for four days to ‘give me time to arrange return shipping with the buyer’.

 

I contacted eBay straight away and spoke to a representative outlining my concerns and also that I had done nothing wrong with regards to mis-selling or misdescribing this camera. The representative implied that she understood my concerns and that Ebay would listen to them.

 

At 16:46 on the same day I received another message from Ebay telling me that the case was ‘temporarily placed on hold’ and that you would get back to me with an update by 18th July 2022.  

 

At this stage as unhappy as I was, I had assumed that you were going to give me a chance at least to explain this case to somebody in Ebay and therefore I did as you said and waited for you to get in touch by the 18th July.

 

I heard nothing more from Ebay until the 20th July when I received a message saying the ‘case is now closed’ and that Ebay had issued the buyer with a full refund of £2519. At no point from the 18th July, to 20th July was I contacted by Ebay.   

 

When I did receive the message that you had refunded him I was completely at a loss with knowing what to do. I contacted Ebay and was put in touch with the High Value Claims Department.  I spoke to a representative who told me that as I had not sent a label back to the buyer for return postage, the case had been closed. Ebay also told me there was nothing more that they could do and that their ‘hands were tied’ with regards to this case.


Ebay suggested that I send the buyer a return label, which would have cost me £20 or so, and that hopefully he might return it. I was not prepared to lose anymore money on the off chance he might or might not decide to return it.

 

Ebay suggested that I try messaging him to see if he would return it, they said if I had no response from him, then Ebay might try messaging the buyer.  But if he failed to respond there’s nothing more Ebay could do. Ebay also told me that as he had a good record, then they had no reason to believe he was acting unscrupulously.

 

I have messaged the buyer in Australia three times, and have had no response from him. My view being that he’s very happy to have kept the camera and to have had his money handed back to him, with no intention of returning it.

 

That, I hope outlines, what has happened.

 

At no point during this process have I had the opportunity to argue against this outcome. Ebay has not listened to my concerns and I am disgusted by the way Ebay have refused to get involved. Ebay have allowed the buyer to keep the camera and have returned him his money.

 

I consider the timeline of messaging to have been confusing and unclear. Had I not received your message informing me of the case going on hold, then I would have, ‘under protest’, sent a return label back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im sorry but I dont quite see why your questions bear any relevance, I'm well aware of the whole ebay procedure.

 

I do not use GSP??   What would that matter?

 

The fact remains that ebay handed over money to the buyer, let him keep the goods and sent me conflicting messages with regards to how to proceed.

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have thought about contacting the bank but my concern is that I will lose my account to sell anything else on ebay.

 

That still leaves the outstanding amount which needs to be claimed for.

 

As I have initiated the small claims court for the full amount would that not cause an issue?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...