Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

WWW.MOUNTBATTENCARSALES.CO.UK/Close Brothers - Faulty car


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 303 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In the default judgement I wrote purposefully that the contract is to be voided due to vehicle of unsatisfactory quality. That is in the judgment! No they have refused to pay (as per the litigation). And if they pay the refuse to allow me to open any more cases against them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what I did last year and it ended up in continuing issues and nothing being finished. The wording is above in the PDF I've attached.

All I care about is the contract being voided AS the judgement states, but CB solicitors are now arguing the toss and won't agree, and attempting to "litigate". Far as I'm concerned, I won the case, they have no leg to stand on. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I answered everything you asked, and put the PDF files.

I appreciate you (everyone) helping in your own time for free etc but do not appreciate being spoken to how I have been throughout this whole case, 

even the "help" was wrong for the first MCOL meaning this has been strung out.

If I get various questions and responses from different people not knowing what I should do, that's not helpful.

Thanks for your attempt to help, I don't think you can help me anymore.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First Claim:

 

Claim Particulars
 
By an HP agreement on 30/4/22 with the defendant I bought a car – Kia Sorento,  for £7700.
 
Within In the first 5 months the car demonstrated defects and is not of satisfactory quality.
 
Claimant was informed by the supplier that it was her own responsibility. Being unaware of her rights, she had certain repairs carried out at her own cost.
The vehicle is presently undrivable and is her premises.
 
The supplier of the car and defendant have both been fully informed and have declined to act refused to take any action.
 
Claimant seeks full reimbursement of purchase price, repair costs & incurred expenses - £5470.53.
 
Defendant has been notified of storage cost.

The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from 31/10/2022 to 16/12/2022 on £5,470.53 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £10.00.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Second most recent claim (currently being 'litigated' and argued about by CB)

Claim Particulars

 
As per claim number: xxxxx, vehicle (reg) has been found to be of unsatisfactory quality.
Considering the defendant has already refunded the deposit, repair costs (up to date of previous claim on 19/12/22) and finance for the first 6 months, 

the claimant is deeming this is conclusive evidence that the finance contract (Agreement Number: 47-803308) should be judged as null and void.
 
Consequently, the claimant is claiming ALL finance payments and any interest since the previous judgement date should also be fully refunded.
 
Additionally, as stated in earlier correspondence, a daily storage fee is being charged from the aforementioned judgement date. The claimant does not require the car to be removed, unless deemed necessary.
 
1480

The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from 28/03/2023 to 16/05/2023 on £2,381.25 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £10.00.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think you understand how much I spent on this car, I wouldn't even break even if I VT, let alone "profit"!

At least half of the money of what I spent on the car to begin with, before the first case. So I have barely £3000 back in my name. I do not have the funds to VT.

If I VT, they would take the car and make me pay the £6000.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1) No. CB has got solicitors involced to litigate.

2) Total agreement: £11662. Total agreement left: £6318.75. If paid now: £6083.17.

3) Total paid (inc all repairs in the last year): £6171.78. (Not inc any extras like hire car etc when car out of order).

Incidentally, just noticed in my bank CB have just paid me the second MCOL payment I am owed...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

"Good morning, 

Customers can voluntarily terminate their agreements in order to return an asset to a lender. Customers are liable up to the half paid amount on an agreement plus any wear and tear that that falls outside of the BVRLA standards ( BVRLA BVRLA Fair Wear & Tear).

If customers is less than half paid and have any liability following the inspect and collect of an asset, they are required to pay this to the finance company in full. If they are not able to do so, the liability will be transferred to a Debt Collection Agency in order for a payment plan to be put in place. 

A Voluntary Termination shows on the credit profile as an asset having been handed back. If there is unpaid liability this will show as an amount outstanding on the credit profile – it will be recorded on the Credit Profile as a Default for the amount unpaid."

No way is the dead car on my drive "normal" wear & tear? 🫣🥲

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what I've been told & emailed:

 

Good afternoon,

Thank you for your recent email confirming you wish to proceed with voluntary termination of your finance agreement.

Your agreement has been transferred to our Asset Recovery Team who will manage your agreement throughout the termination process.

To confirm, you have not paid over 50% of your agreement and your agreement is in arrears of £360.50 for 2 missed payments. Therefore, your liability is £487.75 plus any excess damage deemed outside of fair wear and tear.

We’ve now shared your information with our vehicle inspection agent DMN who will be in contact within the next 5-10 working days to arrange an inspection.  Following the inspection a copy of the inspection report will be emailed to CBMF usually within 24 hours, who will then endeavour to contact you within 72hrs of receiving the report to discuss any damage/mileage costs.

Please follow the link below to access our fair wear and tear guides.

https://www.closemotorfinance.co.uk/customers/finance-explained/information-and-advice

Any excess damage above fair wear and tear will be chargeable.

Inspection Process;

Following this, we’ll then share your information with our vehicle collection agent Motor Auction Group who will be in contact within 5-10 working days to arrange collection of your vehicle, once collected the vehicle will then go into the next available auction and your agreement with CBMF will be terminated. Your credit profile will be updated, and where applicable, any outstanding liabilities will be transferred to our debt collection agency.

Collection Process;

  • MAG will telephone and agree a suitable time/day for collection 
  • Place the vehicle documents V5, MOT/service history and the spare key (s) inside a sealed envelope and have them available for the inspection
  • The MAG Driver will telephone the customer an hour prior to arrival 
  • The driver will then take the vehicle to complete collection 

You’ll be required to complete section V5C/3 (Yellow Section) of your logbook and return this to the DVLA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...