Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Packlink/UPS lost PS5, no insurance - Court Claim Issued Against UPS **SETTLED IN FULL AT MEDIATION**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 525 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Firstly I have spent a number of hours trawling this forum and believe I know the process I need to follow to progress a claim against UPS. I would like to validate this if possible. What has happened so far:

 

- I sent a computer games console (PS5) with UPS after I sold it on eBay.

- The postage was arranged via eBay/Packlink with the declared value being £500.

- Soon after arriving at the Tamworth depot, I received an update that the contents of the package were damaged/lost and the "carton had been discarded".

- I opened a Resolver case with UPS, who told me they could not speak to me and that I would have to speak to Packlink.

- I raised a case with Packlink and they confirmed that the package was damaged/lost. 

- I pushed to get photographic evidence of damage or the contents returned to me. UPS via Packlink said this was not possible and everything had been disposed of.

- Packlink informed me I could not claim for the full amount, as I did not take out additional insurance. Limiting my claim amount via their process to £60.

 

That is where I am at. Am I correct that at this point, I can send a letter of claim to UPS via registered post? I am using information and draft documents in this post as a guide. Do I need to mention anything specifically to forego a response from UPS that would effectively suggest it is Packlink's problem and not theirs?

Thanks,

Matt

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Packlink/UPS lost PS5, no insurance

Thanks for your response.

I did indeed come across this in other threads and will ensure I include it.

 

I have received written (via email) confirmation from Packlink that included a screen grab from a presumed UPS system they have access to (attached). A slight potential complication is the fact that they refer to both damage and loss so the actual fate of the package and the state it was found in is ambiguous in my opinion. 

 

Accompanying email to this screen grab received from Packlink below.

 

Dear Matt, 
 
This is the response I have received from UPS:
 
"Thanks for coming back to me and I really must apologies but all has been disposed of by the centre.
Please allow me to apologise for the inconvenience caused and please pass on to all involved."
 
I understand your frustration. However there is not much more we can do other than process the standard UPS coverage amount of 60 plus the cost of the label.
 
According to our records from the time of purchase, you did not choose to purchase compensation to cover the item declared.

 

Packlink's liability is stated clearly, and you can check UPS website where it states their standard compensation liability too


The terms and conditions accepted by you at the time of purchase state the following:
General Conditions, Section 14 Clause (a) (https://support-ebay.packlink.com/hc/en-gb/articles/360004768420-eBay-Delivery-Powered-by-Packlink-Terms-and-Conditions#h_2c715c64-89e0-4044-ba29-d3356078e449)


(a) Packlink’s liability (whether in contract, tort, negligence or otherwise and howsoever arising) for the loss, theft or damage to any Goods and/or any other matter under or in connection with these Conditions shall, unless the User has chosen enhanced compensation cover as set out in Section 15 (b) be limited to £25.00 for all EVRi delivery services (twenty five GBP) and to £60.00 for UPS, DPD and DHL delivery services (sixty five GBP), whereas EVRi Postable service does not include standard compensation.

 

Packlink shall under no circumstances be liable to the User, whether in contract, tort (including negligence), breach of statutory duty or otherwise, for any loss of profit or indirect or consequential loss.
 
I will be happy to help you with the claim process. I will send you the information in a follow up email. 
 
Best regards,

Victoria

 

 

UPS loss form copy.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

UPS have not responded to my letter. I have drafted a particulars of claim that I will look to send off tomorrow. Feedback welcomed:

 

Quote

The claimant used the defendant's courier service to deliver a laptop, value – £500.00 to a UK address. Reference number XXX. The defendant breached the contract by losing/disposing of the item, prior to redelivering the item back to the claimant, and has not responded to a request to reimburse the claimant to the full value of item. The defendant's agent’s (Parcelink) requirement that a customer is responsible for insuring themselves against the defendant’s own negligence or the criminality of its employees are unfair within the meaning of the Consumer Rights Act 2015 and therefore unenforceable. The claimant seeks £500.00 plus delivery fee £9.59, plus interest pursuant to section 69 of the County Courts act 1984, plus £75.00 compensation for trespass to my property by destroying it without contacting me to confirm my willingness for he defendant to do so. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Monday 7th November. The reason I mention loss and damage is that their position (on a loss form) was that it was damaged and disposed of. From my position should it be loss given that they failed to deliver it or return to me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all,

 

I have an update. UPS contacted me today and agreed to pay the requested amount in full. This consisted of the item cost, compensation, court fee and interest. How we got here:

 

- Claim was issued on 23/11/2022 using MoneyClaim Online

- After receiving no response, I requested judgment on 16/12/2022 and this was issued on 19/12/2022

- Contacted 06/01/2023 by UPS for my bank details so the judgment amount could be paid

 

I was informed by UPS that Packlink should have informed me that at my request they could have contacted UPS and authorised UPS to speak to me regarding my claim, which meant they could have come to a resolution sooner without the need to involve the courts.

 

They also mentioned that some internal absences led to a delay in their response. I do wonder what approach they may have taken had judgment not been issued and no further information on the item's actual fate was given...

 

Thanks for the support of this forum - once I receive the funds, I will be making a donation.

 

Matt

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Packlink/UPS lost PS5, no insurance - Court Claim Issued Against UPS **SETTLED IN FULL AT MEDIATION**
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...