Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

I’m the 3rd party non fault driver, Aviva repeatedly IGNORING my claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 785 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If you do eventually sue then it would be the driver. However a little preparation might be useful and I would suggest that you send an SAR to Aviva and find out what they've got and also that will give you a clue as to why they aren't responding to you.

In a separate letter you could usefully start a formal complaint and tell them that it's going to go to the ombudsman – but also tell them that you may consider bringing a claim against them for unfair treatment under ICOBS.
Make sure the formal complaint is in a separate letter because these people are incapable of appreciating that there are two issues on the same piece of paper.

What is the value of the damage?

As you have the address of the driver you could also go to the land registry web search and see whether they own their property because that will give you a clue as to whether or not they have assets.

https://eservices.landregistry.gov.uk/eservices/FindAProperty/view/QuickEnquiryInit.do?_ga=2.174890539.883102894.1647954903-1500751136.1627887581


 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

You should not send out a letter of claim unless you absolutely intend to proceed with the claim on day 15. Do not try to use a letter of claim as a tactic which is calculated to elicit a reply. If there is no reply or nothing satisfactory then you will be left dangling and you will lose credibility.
A letter of claim is not a bluff. It is a promise to issue a claim if you do not get a satisfactory response – which basically means reimbursement.

I suggest that you post up a letter of claim here in draft for us to have a look but only send it if you have decided to issue the claim.

On the basis of what you tell us here, your chances of winning are extremely high – better than 95% and so you should have no qualms about beginning the claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, be aware that if she does decide to respond she will refer your letter to her insurer and she will require you to contact her insurers and to do with them. Her insurers will do the same thing.

You should not do this. It is her problem. And you should continue directly against her. Don't forget she is the weak link in the chain she. She will have less resolve.

She owes you the money and she is the one who failed to stop so that shows dishonesty.

You can tell her that once you obtain the judgement against that you will be forwarding a copy to the police

Link to post
Share on other sites

I quite agree that the police won't be at all interested. But I would still tell her that you will pass the judgement on to the police .

It's all about leverage

 

You can also tell her that once you get your judgement you will be posting an unredacted copy on this forum and elsewhere on the internet so that her name will be well known for what she has done.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Time to stop chatting about it and to put in procedure.

Post your draft letter of claim here and will have a look.

If you aren't  prepared to send a letter of claim then frankly you may as well give up.

 

If you do send the letter of claim then do understand that you will have to do issue the claim on day 15. Don't imagine that sending a letter of claim is automatically going to produce a response.

You need to take control and show them that you have control.
Even if they respond but they don't meet your demands expressed in letter of claim – then you issue the claim.

Once they receive the claim papers, then you will see a remarkable change in attitude

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...