Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Charging order in deceased joint owners name HELP!


Mitz78

Recommended Posts

Am I in the right place to ask for help with this historic charging order I've just discovered, which is from from a deceased relative with whom I had a joint mortgage with, 

I will provide more information once I know I'm in the right place as it's not easy to explain in writing so the post may be quite lengthy,

I thank anyone in advance who helps or points me in the  right direction, 

thank you.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mantis shrimp - in answer to your questions - 

Date of death of co-owner - 14/02/19

 

If you know - whether the joint ownership was as 'joint tenants' or 'tenants in common'. -

it was joint tenants however I understand that it became tenants in common because of the charging order or am I mistaken?  
 

The date of the charging order - 
08.09.2008

 

(If you do not know, you can upload an anonymised version of the Land Registry title entries: I would be looking at Part B - the Proprietorship Register) - 

I have copied the entry wording here - 

(08.09.2008) RESTRICTION: 

No disposition of the registered estate is to be registered without a certificate signed by the applicant for registration or his conveyancer that written notice of the disposition was given to Cabot Financial (UK) Limited at PO Box 250, West Malling, Kent ME19 4LT being the person with the benefit of an interim charging order on the beneficial interest of 
XXXXXXXXXXXX made by the Bridgend County Court on  11 August 2008 (Claim Number XXXXXXXX).

 

More information -  regarding a newly discovered charging order on my house from the joint owner who sadly passed away in Feb 2019 .

 

The history -

My grandfather did a transfer of equity on his house jointly owned (mortgaged) with his son and my uncle to myself to avoid having to sell the house and have his share of the equity pay for his care following the need for nursing home care following a stroke and severe decline in health. 

 

My self and my uncle re mortgaged in 2006 following some really bad advice from an IFA to change from a repayment mortgage to an interest only mortgage with no repayment vehicle,  bad move I know but I was young and trusted the advice.
 

Fast forward to 2019 my uncle suddenly and unexpectedly passes away, he did not have a will and did not have any assets to speak of as he had ill health and had been on disability benefits for many years so there was no savings, insurance, pensions ect 

 

I called the mortgage company and asked them what happens with the mortgage and house and they advised that as it was a joint mortgage the property would automatically transfer directly to me and all I had to do was send them his death certificate as probate wouldn't be necessary so I did and that was it and thought that covered everything, 

 

My sister was his next of kin as he had never married and had no children, he was estranged from his siblings including my mother as are my sister and I, so my sister dealt with all his other financial and personal dealings which were very straightforward with nothing formal  required as he had just his social security benefits and literally just a few pounds in his bank account so they did not require anything other than his death certificate to close the account. 
 

Fast forward to Dec 2021 when myself and my partner are discussing the mortgage situation as its now due to end in Oct '26 and unfortunately with it being interest only I have no repayment vehicle in place so I have to find a new mortgage in time before this one ends.

 

I downloaded my deeds from the land registry to ensure the details were correct and was shocked to discover that my uncles name is still on there and also there is a charging order on there from 2008, I had no idea about this and discovered that I should have removed my uncles name myself as the mortgage company don't do that but they didn't tell me that when I called with the death notification. 
 

I now also discover that I can't take his name off while the charging order is still there, what do I do? 
 

Will the land registry remove the charge and his name if the charging order is paid or witten off without probate or do I now have to get probate to do that? 

Will I have to go to court and get the order removed?

 

Will I be in trouble as it's been 3 years since he died? 
 

Can I contact the creditor with the charging order and explain he has passed away and the house is now in my name only or at least should be and ask if they will write the debt off and remove or not pursue the charge and write to me to confirm that? 


Do I have to go to court even if they do this or not? 

 

Or will they make me pay it or try and force the sale of the house to get the money? 

With the mortgage being interest only and the house mortgaged almost to the market value there probably wouldn't be any equity to pay them anyway if they did try and force a sale. 

 

What do I need to do to keep my home,  how do I do it and in what order?

 

I am so sorry for the long post and so many questions and probably too much useless information but I'm really worried about this,  I really didn't think I had to do anything with the house or the land registry after speaking with my mortgage company so this really has come as a shock,  especially as no other legal processes where required as my uncle had no other assets or money and the bank and DWP closed everything with just his death certificate, 

 

If you need any more information before advising me please ask , I've probably given more than what's needed but I don't know, I look forward to speaking with you.    

Any guidance at all is greatly appreciated and if I do need to submit certain forms / paperwork then the names and numbers of the forms would be great as I've never had to do anything like this before. 
 

Please help, thanks in advance. 
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I don't understand,  what do you mean? 

 

 

This is the ownership section b which I think means it was a joint tenancy with the detailed restrictions (which I thought became a tenancy in common because of the restriction imposed by Cabot against my uncle). 


 
B: Proprietorship Register / Cofrestr
Perchnogaeth
This register specifies the class of title and
identifies the owner. It contains any entries that
affect the right of disposal.
Mae'r gofrestr hon yn nodi'r math o deitl ac yn enwi'r
perchennog. Mae'n cynnwys unrhyw gofnodion sy'n
effeithio ar yr hawl i waredu.
Title absolute/Teitl llwyr


(05.06.2006) PROPRIETOR: [edited] of
[address]


(27.08.2002) The price stated to have been paid on 18 July 2002 was
XXXXXXXX.


(17.01.2007) RESTRICTION: Except under an order of the registrar no
disposition by the proprietor of the land is to be registered or noted
without the consent of the proprietor of the Charge dated 8 November
2006 in favour of Preferred Mortgages Limited referred to in the Charges Register..


 

(08.09.2008) RESTRICTION: 

No disposition of the registered estate is to be registered without a certificate signed by the applicant for registration or his conveyancer that written notice of the disposition was given to Cabot Financial (UK) Limited at PO Box 250, West Malling, Kent ME19 4LT being the person with the benefit of an interim charging order on the beneficial interest of 
[edited] made by the Bridgend County Court on  11 August 2008 (Claim Number XXXXXXXX).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your response to answer as clearly ask can,  


1. I  clearly misunderstood my mortgage company when they advised me upon me that I had done all I needed to with regards to the house,  I was obviously wrong under the assumption that they would advise the land registry.


2. I don't know how much is owed under the charging order as I have only just found out about it and can only see what I copied off the title register. I am in a position to be able to pay the order as long as it is not in the  thousands of pounds.


3. What do you mean by "careful footwork" am I likely to be in trouble for this as I really did believe that I had done all I needed to do.


With regards to the land registry will they remove his name from the title whilst the charging order remains or will I have to try and deal with that first?

Am I better off getting some legal advice before I do anything?


Was hoping at best that I could hopefully pay off the debt and get the order removed and then remove his name but it looks like that is going to be more difficult than I thought,  also am I going to need probate to do this?

Sorry I'm just so confused and worried and I don't want to make the wrong move, also worried that I have unintentionally broken the law 😢

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will the land registry remove his name from the title deeds with the restriction k still in place? 


as I am looking to remortgage with a new lender I understand that the restriction has to be removed/paid in order to avoid any issues with the remortgage , I am just unsure how to do this when it is in the deceased joint owners name.


Trying to avoid legal fees if possible and avoid probate in not required anybody have some clear advice for me or do I have no choice but to see a  solicitor 😢

 

I really do appreciate everyone's help so far, thank you Mantis shrimp and dx100uk 🙂

Link to post
Share on other sites

That sounds great, thank you Mantis shrimp,  I will let you know what happens when I send the form off and I get a response from the land registry so may be a couple of weeks before I know more, but will try and investigate more about what you said as well regarding beneficial interest ect see what we discover, thanks again and speak soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you dx100uk I will re read those threads and try and understand how these restrictions work,  my head is fried with all this information at the moment,  so I'm going to get his name removed in the first instance and deal with the restriction after that,  will keep you posted 🙂

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can confirm that there is no such entry that would relate to the property being tenants in common and the mortgage and house was a joint tenancy and is now just a sole proprietor ,

 

I have confirmed this with my mortgage company and the land registry who are sending the form to remove his name from the title deeds 

 

the land registry did advise that although his name would be removed as joint proprietor the restriction k would remain until I apply to have it removed or Cabot withdraw the restriction,

 

I will update when this progresses, thank you again for for your help 👍😉

Edited by dx100uk
added A few blank lines only..dx
Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course, the land registry is also sending me the form to do that also, I belive its form RX3 or RX4 I forget but they are sending it to me, I didn't think to do it the same time, I was going to wait until I got confirmation of the name removal using form DJP and then apply for the restriction k to be removed using your reasoning and based on your advice, would it be beneficial to do this at the same time? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then I'll do it together, least it's one shot then and I'll no sooner if it works. 

Where have the comments from Mantis shrimp gone??

I can't see them in the thread or the 2nd page of the thread for some reason, 

any forum moderator or anyone else for that matter know what has happened??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh ok didn't think of that,

I thought it was useful advice for me anyway,  the same as I thought about your advice but oh well least it's not anything I've done wrong eg messed up settings or notification permissions ect not even sure that's possible though lol

 

hope you're well though,  I'm just waiting on the land registry forms to progress my situation forward, on hold until then and then will see what happens going forward.

 

Updates to follow. 

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...