Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Budget Star Limited Used Car - Small Claims Court


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 798 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Firstly please notice that you have posted your story in a block of text which is difficult to read especially for people on small screens such as telephones.

Please will you post your responses properly spaced and punctuated.

Thank you.

Who's the dealer?

Please can you tell us more about the car – make, model, mileage, price paid.

How far are you away from the dealer?

Did you pay by cash? Did you pay by bank transfer? How did you pay?

You say that you bought it at a distance. Does this mean that you bought it and paid for it before you even went to it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see there is some reference in your letter to the car being delivered to your business address. Was this a business purchase or have you bought this as a private owner?

Also I see that the letter which you sent in September purported to be a letter of claim. Why are you sending letters of claim would say that you're going to take legal action and then you don't follow through?

Well done on recording your calls. We have had people here for years who are well aware that they should always read our customer services guide and record their calls and yet they don't take it seriously until it bites them in the bum.

Have you had an independent assessment of all the defects? Do you have at least one quote for the work required to any of the defects which have not yet been addressed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You aren't running out of time under the consumer rights act as long as you assert your right before the expiry of the six months.
In any event, regardless of the consumer rights act you would be well protected by the ordinary law of contract – and even under the consumer rights act, you are entitled that the car should be of satisfactory quality and remain that way for a reasonable period of time.

I'm afraid that the rights which are apparently conferred under the consumer rights act are rather overblown and don't have much meaning when a dealer doesn't want to honour those rights. And when the dealer is prepared to honour those rights then the protection of the consumer rights act is not necessary.

 

What do you want to do with the car? Do you want to get it repaired and keep it or do you want to get shot of it?

How much money have you spent on the car?

Maybe you can give us a bullet pointed itemisation of your expenses incurred so far

Link to post
Share on other sites

He has promised to reimburse you for certain repairs and he has reneged on this promise.

 

I understand that you have drawn his attention to all of the faults and he has refused to repair them or to pay for the repairs. He has only agreed to pay for some limited repairs.

Is this correct? Do you have evidence of this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope you can see that I have had to introduce spacing into your post again. I don't think you are being very fair to us.

 

Quote

Dear XXX

Vehicle registration number XXX – letter of claim

You are fully aware of all the defects which exist state.

Since then I have given you an opportunity to carry out repairs – and in fact you have told me to carry out the repairs and you will reimburse me.

I have carried out some of the repairs and you have not reimburse me despite reminders.

I'm now confirming that you have been given an opportunity to repair the vehicle and clearly you have declined so I'm now rejecting the vehicle and I require a full refund plus the reimbursement of all the work carried out which amounts to improvements so that when you eventually sell the vehicle you will be to recover your money.

I require that you reimburse me £XXX which includes the cost of the vehicle, or repairs carried out so far, and other ancillary losses.

I also require that you make arrangements to collect the vehicle as soon as possible although please note that I shall payment before you collect the vehicle or at the same time but in a secure form.

 

If you do not comply with this then I shall begin proceedings in the County Court for the recovery of the sums plus interest and without any further notice.

Believe me

 

 

Have a look at the above letter. See if you agree with it and you are prepared to sign off and send it.

I suggest that you send it by email and also by post – recorded delivery.

Stop using WhatsApp et cetera. This business needs to be taken seriously now but certainly you should print off all messages you have and make sure they are stored securely.

If you're prepared to send the letter above, then realise that we are not bluffing. You must issue the claim on day 15.

Start reading on this forum about the steps involve taking a small claim in the County Court. Register with the County Court money claim website this and start preparing your claim and post any drafts here so that we can check. You can save your work as you go.

Please confirm that you are happy to take this next step

  • I agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If he doesn't have them already – then yes make sure he is fully informed.

Indicate in your letter of claim what information you are including for his benefit

It worries me when you use the word "template".

I think we would like to see the final letter before you post it off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I understand your question correctly, you need to have the entire value of your claim calculated and stated when you make your claim. You won't be able to add things later on.

Not quite true – you could amend the claim but it will cost you as much as £275 to amend the claim and you probably won't get that back.

Best to get it right the first time even if it means that there is a delay.

If you are considering having any repairs done then you must inform the person you are suing in advance and give them an opportunity to comment. You should provide that person with an assessment of the work needs doing and a couple of estimates and you choose the cheapest estimate

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid that you are a difficult ground. Certainly any steps you take should be properly informed notified to the dealer in advance together with projected costs in order to give the dealer an opportunity to respond.

Are you sending your notifications by any kind of recorded delivery? Special delivery would be best. You don't want to be in a position where the dealer says that he hadn't received any of your communications.

It's not unreasonable to want to dispose of the car. However I think you would certainly have to notify him in advance that this is what you are doing and when you are made an offer on it, you should let him know what the offer is and once again give him an opportunity to object.

You would have to take all these precautions in order to make sure that you are squeaky clean and that a court agreed that the dealer had been given every possible chance and had been fully informed from the outset.

I have to say that a dealer who behaves in this way worries me to the extent that even if you get a judgement in your favour – as you surely will, enforcement could be an entirely different matter.
I'm afraid that dealers who behave in this way are past masters at avoiding enforcement so that you end up with a judgement which effectively is meaningless and of course you will have incurred court costs et cetera.

However I really don't see any other way to go. I hope you won't be buying a vehicle in these kind of distant circumstances again.

I think you're gonna have to make your own judgements as to whether or not you should sell the vehicle. It certainly not unreasonable. Where is it now? And is it working at all? Is it driveable?

 

Certainly this has gone on quite long enough and you need to take action for the entire value of the car plus any repairs. Whether or not you want to sell the car is a complete the separate matter – and of course if you did then certainly you would reduce your claim by the amount of money that you receive for the vehicle less any expenses incurred selling it – and of course you would claim for the improvements.

However as I've already suggested, you are entering into rather complicated territory.

If you stop driving it then it would be reasonable to claim for storage charges at, say, £10 or £15 per day. Once again you have to notify the dealer in advance that this is what you are doing and frankly I think I would start calculating the storage charges from the very moment that you stopped driving the car. The dealer can always challenge them in court if he wants.

Sorry that this is not a definitive answer. I suppose I'm playing safe by simply explaining the principles and the convocations but you will have to make your own decision


 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • BankFodder changed the title to Budget Star Limited Used Car - Small Claims Court

You have to give 14 days notice – not 7

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bare should be bear - but yes, it's fine

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Please monitor this thread for a fuller reply later on

Link to post
Share on other sites

It might be an idea if you went through the letter that he has sent you and isolate each point and then comment on each point.

This would be best done in a tabulated format.

Have a two column Microsoft Word table with the point you have identified on the left, and your comments on the right. And maybe 1/3 column with a link to any evidence – SMS et cetera that you might have in support.

He says that he didn't agree to the repair. What do you want to say about that?

In terms of delivery charge, if you are entitled to a refund then I would say you are also entitled to the delivery charge. Although it was your choice, it is all part and parcel of the same contract and if the main contract fails then the ancillary contracts must fail as well.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand your concern at getting paid if you get a judgement.
However you have no guarantee that you will get paid even if you simply accept the refund. If you return the car to him without the money then he has the car and your money. It seems unlikely to me that he will give you the money before you return the vehicle – but of course you could propose that and see what the reaction is.

If you sue him for the cost of the vehicle plus your ancillary losses I expect that you would get judgement for the lot but as I mentioned at the outset in this post, enforcement can be a problem.
It is always a problem – especially when one is dealing with used-car dealers. I don't know why but they often seem to be particularly slippery.

Your tabulated commentaries extreme helpful.
The threats he made are extremely unpleasant and I would certainly be bringing those before the court plus the other comments made which clearly amount to an acknowledgement that he had been informed of the possible work and that he was prepared to pay it.

It certainly absolutely normal that you should be able to claim for the refund of the vehicle and he should not benefit by the improvements to it and he should pay for that as well. Particularly as he was aware of them in advance.

Could you just please itemise your losses here in a tabulated form. Include the cost of the vehicle, any work, fares or petrol et cetera going to fetch it, insurance – anything else. List it all and give us a total

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Nice to know that he made at least one customer happy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...