Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowell claimform - Vodafone Debt Faulty Phone ***Settled by Mediation***


SirHumpy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1032 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys this one got a bit away from me and need to enter my defence by 19/02/21. Any help appreciated.

Name of the Claimant ? Lowell

 

Date of issue –  20/01/21

 

Date to submit defence   -22/02/21

 

 

Particulars of Claim

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? 

 

1.The defendant entered into an agreement with Vodafone under account reference XX ("the agreement")

 

2.Th defendant failed to maintain the required payments and the service was terminated.

 

3. The agreement was later assigned to the claimant on 29/11/2019 and notice given to the defendant.

 

4.Despite repeated requests for payment the sum of £593.18 remains due and outstanding.

 

And the claimant claims:

 

the said sum of £593.18

Interest pursuant to s69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue, accruing at the daily rate of £0.130 but limited to one year, being £47.45

costs

 

What is the total value of the claim? £770.63
 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Only just before the court paperwork, around a week.
 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No.
 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? NA

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Mobile phone and airtime
 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? Afterwards, probably 2017
 

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online
 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes
 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Lowell say they own the debt.
 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not until just before court paperwork.
 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not that I recall.
 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? No
 

Why did you cease payments? Dispute over faulty handset, Vodafone stopped replying to contacts. Raised complaint, received no reply.
 

What was the date of your last payment? in 2019
 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? Yes, Vodafone simply ignored me.
 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? I offered before ceasing payments to come to a settlement, they refused.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Paragraph 1 is denied with regards to the defendant entering into an agreement referred to in the Particulars of Claim (‘the Agreement’) the Claimant has yet to disclose any such agreement.

.

2. Paragraph 1 is denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant the claimant has failed to provide any evidence of assignment/balance/breach as requested by CPR 31. 14 and the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

© show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

.

3. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

.

4. On the alternative, if the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974.

.

5.Notwithstanding the above should the alleged amount claimed include an early termination charge(s) amounting to the entire balance of the remaining contract. OFCOM guidance states that any Early Termination Charge that is made up of the entire balance if the remaining contract is unlikely to be fair as it fails to take into account the fact that the provider no longer has to provide and pay for their service.

.

6. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

Is that one ok? - thank you 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Lowell claimform - Vodafone Debt Faulty Phone
  • 6 months later...

Thank you for re-opening and apologies for delay in responding.

Claim went to mediation,

I used the info from here - especially as they had said the debt relates to airtime not used,

went back and forth via mediator (who was really nice).

I offered 10% in full and final they refused it and wanted 75%, then 50%

- on final round they said they would refuse anything less,

but then came back and accepted the 10%.

Have mediators report to cover legally.

Good result. Thank you.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to Lowell claimform - Vodafone Debt Faulty Phone ***Settled by Mediation***
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...