Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Smart ANPR PCN - Faulty Machine - Bell Centre Melton MowbrayParking Ltd


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 946 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This morning I received a letter from DR+ demanding £170. The date of parking charge was 23/10/20. The letter says they have 'traced' me to this address because letters sent by Smart to the address the DVLA hold for me, were not answered.

 

At this point I should point out I moved from Surrey to Leicestershire in 2018 and I registered a change of address with the DVLA. My driving licence is this address and though I have been unable to find it today, I am pretty sure I would have changed my address on my V5.

 

Now, I can confirm I was at the car park when they said and yes, no payment was made because despite trying several times, the one and only machine said "Cancelled. Printing error". I know because I photographed it, just in case.

 

I gather I ignore this demand but I have never had a parking problem so I would be very grateful if you could advise me of my next move please.

 

 

DR+ demand + Machine pic.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Smart ANPR PCN - Faulty Machine - Bell Centre Melton MowbrayParking Ltd
  • 2 weeks later...

1 Date of the infringement

23/10/2019
 

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date]

No idea on original but Debt Recovery Plus states their notice is 07/01/2021
 

[scan up BOTHSIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide]

please do not put JPG Picture files into your post

 

3 Date received

11/01/2021
 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?]

Back of letter mentions it.
 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event?

Photographic evidence I went in and out of the car park, also I have evidence the payment machine was not working.
 

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal]

No as didn't know I had it.
 

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up

n/a
 

7 Who is the parking company?

Smart Parking Ltd

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town]

Bell Centre Melton Mowbray
 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.

Not been given the option
 

There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure,

please check HERE

 

If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here

Second letter demanding payment by 29/01/2021

 

 

Parking.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Thanks Andy.

 

I have probably messed up. I had a bad bereavement at the beginning of June and got a Letter before Action from Smarts debt collectors. I decided to appeal to Smart with the photographic evidence above.

 

Of course they rejected it. Told me I was parked for 24 minutes and I could appeal to Popla or the Ombudsman but they don't take part with the ombudsman. So I went to Popla gave my evidence and now the evidence from Smart has returned.

 

One point they say is that a payment was made for the reg but it's not my car. And it couldn't be me as the car stayed for 65 minutes.

 

The next piece of evidence is a long list of car's regs showing the time they entered, how much paid, how long the car has paid for and on first impression shows the time the car is due to leave, e.g. arrives 10.24am, paid 1hr, must leave by 11.24am. However, a couple of them show 2hrs are paid and the time left is 1hr. And every single one is either exactly 1hr or 2hrs to the minute. So I can only assume this alleged document showing all the cars parked on the day is fabricated to appear to show tickets purchased.

 

Also they say "as you can see *my reg* has registered a payment but the full reg does not belong to the Appealant". I will get the exact wording later but it makes zero sense and a judge would rip it apart. 

 

Any advice please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx and thanks. 

 

I feel a bit stupid and was caught at a low ebb. I gather Popla will just award in their favour?

 

I have 7 days to reply as the Smart evidence arrived today. I have stated I dispute the alleged debt and the pcn is not a fair representation of lost revenue. Still no reason why I got that message on the machine. If I had done something wrong, which I didn't, surely they would have an explanation as to why that Cancelled Printing Failed message would appear?

 

Also, why are they trying to make out my car isn't my car?

 

BTW, I did get your email but can't find it to reply. Sorry I wasn't being rude.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Dave.

 

I wouldn't mind but I overpay at all car parks so I don't get caught out. What idiot risks going to a private car park not paying 70p in the hope they WON'T get a £60 or as it was £170 fine? 

 

Over the weekend I will get up their evidence so you can see what I mean. I believe the alleged database of cp payers is just a fabricated mess that most people would crumble at, but it makes no sense. They are trying to show everyone leaves the cp dead on the hour or 2hrs. 

 

Anyhow, I am sorry I messed up. We all get caught out I guess with the sneaks, on occasion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just to let you know I got a decision from Popla and I am to pay £85, which I don't have. They didn't mention my evidence only that when Smart sent incorrect evidence and even said I had paid, it was an "error".

Where next?

Happy to fight on if I can.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just pressed the link re: updating if lost the V5C. It goes to a 404 type page. I am sure it was around but cannot find it. I have tried several times a week to ring them this year and end up getting cut off. I will have another dig about tomorrow. 

 

I honestly thought I updated both driving licence and V5C when I moved. 

 

Feel a bit foolish ☹

Edited by LestahLass
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Got a Letter from Debt Recovery Plus that arrived this afternoon.

 

I allegedly owe £170, which is NOT what the appeal people said. £85 I believe. 

 

Option A pay up.

Option B face potential court action.

 

If I ignore and not contact them, they will, after 7 days, start legal Recovery actions.

 

Abigale wants me to have a fair outcome and avoid court action. She has provided a fair analysis of my case. I allegedly owe £170. 

 

Option to pay by payment plan lost in 7 days from date of letter which was 22/10/2021, so I have til tomorrow to pay, else it goes to court.

 

If I don't pay they will contact me again with steps required to move for legal action.

 

My lovely CAGer's, where do I go from here please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know I should read far more but I genuinely do not have any real understanding of parking laws. I will try to read up but do not want to make the mistake I did originally, by appealing. I am actually quite scared of this one and really want to double check I am doing the right thing. Thank you for being patient and I will do more reading. 

 

Thank you all for your help thus far.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...