Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Clarion Housing - Service charges went from £830 to £1,242.


Recommended Posts

We live in a flat and with Clarion Housing who are a housing association. 

 

Today we all got a summary of what the service charges estimates were, and what they actually were. The estimates were £412 less than the actual costs. The three main increases were:

 

  • Communal Electricity - Estimated £45.00, Actual £241.73
  • Communal Water - Estimated £3.66, Actual £234.91
  • Fire Protection - Estimated £2.08, Actual £147.65

 

We have no idea what the electricity cost is for. Someone could have been stealing power for all we know.

 

The water, I recall a water leak (last year / early this year) in the "Energy Centre" which is a big boiler than pumps hot water around to all the properties in the estate and heat exchange units transfer it to our hot water and heating. This means the leak must have cost at least £100,000 overall in lost water which doesn't add up at all. 

 

Fire protection was some work that was carried out when they realised that there wasn't enough fire protection in the buildings. They had to remove cladding and fit fire proof cladding, they put fire brakes above fire doors etc. 

 

Does this seem fair that we're having to pay for these? What can we do? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Stu.

 

I'm a housing association tenant. We pay rent. I live in a block of 11 other flats, the estate has multiple blocks, something like 300 - 600 properties in total. 

 

Shouldn't fire protection have been put in place in the beginning, or only where we can prove it wasn't up to regulations before we moved in? They had to fireproof around all fire doors, pump in fire proofing into the brickworks and cladding, and also added fireproofing around electrical cupboards. Surely this should have been done in the first place?

 

The water charge turned out to be to do with a fault on the communal boiler, managed by SSE. Lots of people received compensation for this. but we are all being charged £200 to £300 for this, which means around £75,000 to £100,000 repair costs which makes no sense. I am also told there is a fund to cover repair costs to this that we're already paying for, but I don't have any information on this. 

 

I emailed them to two of their customer care email addresses, usually would get some sort of confirmation, but nothing this time. I'll draft up a letter and post it.

 

Thanks,

 

Joe

 

Edit: One of many news articles about this estate: https://www.romfordrecorder.co.uk/news/it-s-very-scary-says-orchard-village-rainham-resident-as-wooden-slats-revealed-behind-metal-cladding-1-5078277

 

 

Edited by JoeyJoeC
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi,

 

All the tenant's I've spoken to have this charge added. I eventually got an email back from the "Service Charge & Section 20 Officer" for Clarion with the below:

 

Quote

Thank you for your email queries, in relation to the 2019-2020 actual service charges.

 

Please be advised that I am investigating the communal and water charges. Once my investigation is completed, I would send you a revised service charges letter.

 

Thanks for your patience whilst I am investigating.

 

This was almost a month ago now. It's been well over a month since I requested to see a copy of the invoices. I've emailed him back twice and called twice but I don't hear back from him, or anyone else at Clarion.

 

There's a bunch of us that are complaining about charges. Some people in other blocks are getting charged for use of the secure car parks, that they don't actually have access to etc. It's a mess. 

 

I will write a complaint letter now as an individual. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

They send a summary every year with the previous year, estimates and actual costs. I used this to work out the increases in the first post.

 

The issue is, they don't break down the charges enough, so we have no idea why "Communal Water" went from an estimate of £3.66 to £234.91. 

 

They're telling me that they're waiting for clarification on the service charges before they can tell me anything. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

A somewhat good result. After more chasing, they've sent me a spreadsheet of the accounts for fire protection, water charges and electric. 

  • Communal Electricity - Estimated £45.00, Actual £241.73 - Revised: £41.63
  • Communal Water - Estimated £3.66, Actual £234.91 - Revised: £76.96
  • Fire Protection - Estimated £2.08, Actual £147.65 - Revised: £51.15

Still it seems too high, the total for this estate alone for water charges came to £62,950.07 last year. The thing is, they've listed blocks that don't seem to exist on our estate. Possibly from the new development that has only just been built on the estate, which was finished in the summer this year. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

We've had the "Your new rent and service charges" (from 5th April 2021) letter, and it appears that they're basing our new charges on the original 'Actual Charges 2019/20 letter', and not the 'Revised Actual Charges 2019/20' letter. 

 

Communal Electricity
2019/20 Actual charges showed actual costs were £241.73
2019/20 Revised Actual charges showed actual costs were £51.15
New charges we will be paying says £4.90 per week / £254.80 for the year

The electricity charges appear to be reasonable (on the revised actual costs letter), they're around the same as previous years, albeit slightly higher year on year. 

 

Communal Water
2019/20 Actual charges showed actual costs were £234.91
2019/20 Revised Actual charges showed actual costs were £76.96
New charges we will be paying says £4.62 per week / £240.24 for the year

This still doesn't make any sense to us, the water charges for 30 blocks combined (I will take a walk around the estate soon as I don't recognise half of the blocks) was £62,950.18 across two invoices. They completely ignore any requests to know what this is actually for. In previous year's, we've always been charged less than £10 for the entire year. 
 

Fire Protection
2019/20 Actual charges showed actual costs were £147.65
2019/20 Revised Actual charges showed actual costs were £41.63
New charges we will be paying says £2.90 per week / £150.80 for the year

I went through 6 years of service charge letters and it looks like they've not been doing any of the servicing of the Fire Protection equipment until post Grenfell, which is why the costs were suddenly high.

 

 

I now plan to write a formal complaint letter raising these points, along with a few other queries, and quoting the Landlord and Tenants Act 1985 (Section 22(2)) that states: "The tenant, or the secretary with the consent of the tenant, may within six months of obtaining the summary require the landlord in writing to afford him reasonable facilities— (a)for inspecting the accounts, receipts and other documents supporting the summary, and (b)for taking copies or extracts from them". 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Got a call from Clarion just now, from the person in charge of the service charges who said they put down the charges as weekly, when they should have been for the whole year, which explains why some of the charges are now 50 times more expensive than last year. I don't have much faith in this person, as he admitted he thought something was wrong but couldn't work it out until he saw my email. 

 

I pressed him to find out if this is affecting all the flats on the estate, he said he doesn't know, but is going through every service charge correcting them and everyone will yet again get a letter.

 

I of course asked for all this to be in writing which he said he will do. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This appears to be affecting everyone on the estate. 550+ homes. 

 

£633 per household, ~£350,000 in total they nearly over charged for this. Shocking - at least it would be to me if I hadn't seen the BBC Panorama episode which was almost completely based around Clarion and their service charges. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I had already emailed them back before your post, but I will make another formal complaint. I've emailed asking what is happening and when will I get the correct service charges letter but every email gets forwarded to the same person in charge of our service charges and he gets extremely defensive and now has stopped replying to me. 

 

It has also been more than one month and a day since I requested supporting documents for all service charges which is a legal requirement under the Landlords and Tenants Act 1985 (section 22) that they make them available within one month. 

 

At this point, I've had no other indication that they're not going to charge me the incorrect amounts on my next direct debit. Would it be wise to cancel this until they can send me the new charges letter?

 

Also, there happens to be a Team's meeting with Clarion tonight to give residents the opportunity to voice concerns about the service charges. I'll be sure to join!

Edited by JoeyJoeC
Link to post
Share on other sites

After the meeting, in which I raised this, they've sent a revised service charges letter. 

 

The new amounts (yearly):

  • Communal Electricity - £5.02 (£0.10 a week)
  • Communal Water - £6.03 (£0.10 a week)
  • Fire Protection - £3.66 (£0.10 a week)

The weekly's are what they put down on the same letter. Actually looking at this charges sheet, they've messed it up. They've also put the yearly cost for "Provision of mechanical and electrical" as weekly 😒.

 

I think I'll wait for the direct debit to come out of my account and work out if this is just a mistake on paper or if they're over charging me on other charges. 

 

 

 

 

Actually, what the hell is going on with this letter? The amounts are all over the place! Look at the "Weekly total for the whole year". Our rent is £101.23 a year? 

 

I just called the accounts people just to check what they're going to be charging me and they said £125 a week. The letter says £111.60... 

 

Not sure what to do anymore! They're extremely useless. 

revised service charges letter..pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 21/04/2021 at 01:29, stu007 said:

Hi

 

I really do not know what your Housing Association are playing at but on looking at that breakdown I would understand it if you were a Leaseholder in one of the flats but certainly not as a Tenant as some on that list are NOT a Service Charge for Tenants they are included in the Rent that you pay i.e.

 

Administration Fee - Not for a Tenant as this is what your rent pay different if a Leaseholder.

Communal Cleaning - Yes they could charge this for both Tenant and Leaseholder.

Communal Electricity - Not for Tenant as this is what your rents pay different if Leaseholder.

Communal Water - Not for Tenant as this is what you rent pay different if Leaseholder.

Communal Window Cleaning - Yes they could charge this for both Tenant and Leaseholder.

Door Entry Service Contract - Not for Tenant as this is what your rent pay different if a Leaseholder.

Estate Caretaking - Not for Tenant as this is what your rent pay different if a Leaseholder.

Fire Protection - Not for Tenant as this is what your rent pay different if a Leaseholder.

Grounds Maintenance Contract - Not for Tenant as this is what your rent pay different if a Leaseholder.

Lifts - Not for Tenant as this is what you pay your rent different is a Leaseholder.

Playground Maintenance - Not for Tenant as this is what you pay rent for different if a Leaseholder.

Provision of mechanical and electrical - Not for Tenant as this is what you pay your rent for different if a Leaseholder.

Provision of other equipment - Not for Tenant as this is what you pay rent for different if a Leaseholder.

Refuse Collection - Yes they could charge this for both Tenant and Leaseholder.

Roof Top Safety - Not for Tenant as this is what you pay rent for different if a Leaseholder.

Water Pump Maintenance - Not for Tenant as this is what you pay your rent for different if a Leaseholder.

 

Challenge, Challenge, Challenge but everyone must do this as what I am seeing from what you have posted to be honest is charges that I would expect to see a Leaseholder get and them to have the cheek to add an Administration Fee what the Heck are they playing at.

 

If you look through the list their are only a couple of things I point out they could charge for both Tenant and Leaseholder but the rest IMO is what I would expect to see a Leaseholder being charged not a Tenant of a Housing Association otherwise they are making one hell of a Profit with the Rents.

 

The best way I can describe the above if that came in front of me at a Board Meeting (I was Vice Chair of a very Large Housing Association) the Financial Officer would be torn a new one at that meeting by me and told to explain why that was not taken into account for any proposed Rent Increase as the most of those in that list should be in the rents paid not added as a seperate Service Charge to Tenants the difference is when it comes to Leaseholders or those that have purchased the property in a Housing Association Building.

 

 

Thanks Stu. Do you know where I can find some official documentation about what they're legally allowed to charge for? They're still ignoring me, I plan to go to my MP about this as I've now got a list of people that are being overcharged £100's for their mistakes and they won't do anything unless they complain themselves. I can only assume all 500+ tenants are being 'scammed' by them, it's a huge deal and there needs to be some sort of enquiry.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not just badly formatted, the totals don't add up, the column headings don't make sense. For example "Provision of mechanical and electrical" has the same amount on both tables, where as others are different. From what I could understand, the bottom table (should be) the total yearly amounts, so each value should be 52 times the top table, but they've not done that for everything. The bottom table also has a total (not shown) of £125 a week. I called them to ask how much I would be paying, and they're using that amount (£125 vs £111.60 which is on the lastest letter). 

 

I've checked my tenancy agreement, and it doesn't actually say if I am fixed or variable, they never filled out the boxes on that one. I'd assume variable though. 

Edited by JoeyJoeC
Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't yet.

I ended up emailing them so many times, and the only responses I get are "Someone will contact you" which never happens.

They're not even sending me supporting evidence of the service charges which is a legal requirement which they've breached.

They're not going to send me anything I ask for but doesn't mean I wont try. 

Thinking the same SAR, but as above, I've been sending them so many emails and calling them, even speaking at the residents meeting in front of councillors and Clarion staff , the CEO's assistant assured me they were looking into the complaint and I would get a response in 10 days time. That will be by the 29th.

If I don't hear anything, I will make a sar request, and also contact our MP.

I already have SHAC (shaction.org) very interested in this. 

We get the actuals every September which shows how much they actually spent. I keep everything and went through all previous years, only this year have they made this cockup. I did call their accounts team to ask how much will be charging me, they said £125.54 per week which was the old amount.

I told them my new revised letter says £111.60, they said they don't know anything about that and said someone from the service charges team will call me back that was 5 days ago. I was tempted to cancel my direct debit and only pay the amounts I have, but it may be better to see what they actually charge me. 

Just to reiterate, I requested supporting documents, invoices and receipts for the 2019/2020 service charges well over a month ago, they've committed an offence by not providing me with this, at this point, they've not been able to prove to me that any of the amounts are correct.

I'm sure they're still overcharging, they know they've messed up, and refuse to do anything more about it other than correct the three charges I complained about, for me only, and not for the other 500+ properties here. 

Oh and I don't know if this changes anything, but my tenancy ends in October 2021, my contract says I need to vacate unless they extend it. We're worried they may not extend it because of all this hassle we're giving them and we will have to move. 

Lastly, our tenancy agreement actually doesn't say if we have fixed or variable, they never filled in that page. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I will look at the post again.

The tenants I'm speaking to are housing association tenants just like myself, they have very similar charges to the ones I were getting which they admitted over charging on, there is no way a tenant should be paying £300 a year for communal water alone

for example, when every year it has been around £4, and they have admitted to me that the £300 figure was a computer error and have corrected mine back to the lower figure. It's only right they should be correcting everyone's but no one I have spoken to has received a service charges letter other than ourselves. We have a Facebook group with 100's of members so I regularly post about this on that group. 

The mistakes are because the person who made the changes literally just changed some of the fields in an excel spreadsheet without calculating totals. The other values are the same as the old service charges letter.

We don't have any rent free weeks. 

Just re-read Stu's post, that's absolutely correct, we shouldn't be paying for a great deal of these charges as stated in the Landlords and Tenants act 1985 (section 11). We're certainly not a leaseholder, our tenancy is 5 years at a time. 

Furthermore, they've left the section in our tenancy agreement about which service charges we need to pay blank. A second document provided to us suggests it's variable however. 

Attaching the entire service charges letter (the latest one), please let me know if I should scan any other documents that may help with this. 

 

REDACTED (01-04-2021) Received 20 April 2021. April 2021 Revised Service Charges.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had a call from Clarion (of which I have recorded of course).

It was someone from their complaints team who gather the initial information for a complaint.

He said the complaint was put in their system on the 20th April, not the 14th of March which is when I sent the email titled "Official Complaint".

The 20th of April was when I received the last "Revised service charges" letter, which to no one's surprise, they can't find a copy of on their system. 

Tomorrow they will email me and ask me to go into detail about the whole complaint to which I will include a timeline showing how many times they have ignored my emails and calls

. It will also give me a chance to query whether or not I should be paying for half of these charges as a tenant (thanks Stu). 

I will of course ask for the policy documents, and I will send a SAR in as soon as I can. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sent detailed timeline of communication as well as in detail my whole complaint, and other issues that have arisen as a result. Requested all the policy documents in #38. Not sent the SAR just yet. 

They've started taken payments based on the initial incorrect service charges amount,  not even the reduced amounts shown on my latest service charges letter. 

Have been speaking to an action group, who are putting together a dossier regarding service charges from housing associations, they see this case as a strong case, and have gotten the interest of ITV and possibly the BBC.

I don't know if at this point it would be a good idea to go as far as an interview on a news segment.

Would it be best to wait for the outcome of the complaints process?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Clarion Housing - Service charges went from £830 to £1,242.

It fizzled out, they kept delaying the complaints process. In the end I believe they stopped charging me for a bunch of services, unsure if it was deliberate or a mistake so I stopped bringing it up. Ultimately we bought a house and moved out.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...