Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

barclaycard PPI


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1353 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi ,

I told my mother to put in a query on the Barclay website for Barclaycard PPI right on the deadline last August.

Apart from 2 or 3 letters saying we will eventually get to to your claim we`ve heard nothing until today

 

a letter arrived asking for all sorts of info.

This is from over 20 years ago and they are wanting loads of details concerning savings , wages employments etc... she will certainly struggle with all these requests.  

 

Any advice 

should we try and put what we can in and send it back.

 

She certainly hasn't got records of savings etc... from then or exact working hours ,but she was working full time .

 

Ive attached letter hopefully with personal details blacked out.

 

I have done ppi in the past but always used the Ombudsman questionnaire .

thanks

 

 

barclaycard ppi-1-converted.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you merged

 

have you par chance a copy of the original letter that was sent?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so where are they getting all this info from she was a student working part time from?

or is that letter a generic guess and bears no relation to her circumstances at the time?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The student part must be just part of their standard response. My mother was working full time  at the time , had sick cover , life insurance some savings and an isa.  Do i just fill in the ombudsman ppi form and put any details in there and send it to them as soon as possible.

I notice how theyve gave 10 days from the date of the letter , which only just came.

Edited by Tired and Weary
Link to post
Share on other sites

yes.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Again, i did this and they dont agree the PPI was missold , but have included a check for over £1000 for ppi commision.

 

They say the PPI was sold over the phone and the PPI was explained in full ,

but in a SAR request that was done on the main account there is a scan of a paper application with the PPI ticked ,

it is also dated the end of 1995 and they say the PPI was taken out in 1998.

(a 3 year gap to apply for PPI seems highly unlikely)

 

My mother says she would have picked  up the application in the supermarket she worked in and it would be very unlike her to apply for a credit card over the phone .

 

This is getting highly confusing .

She had this card and one linked card mentioned in their correspondence.

My mother has already put the cheque in her bank , as she only just handed me the letter

she didnt realise that they had declined the actual PPI claim..

 

Will this stop us going to the Ombudsman to dispute the actual PPI payment part?????

 

Any advice thanks?

Link to post
Share on other sites

that is called a plevin reclaim,,,of the commission they charged her for selling her the PPI.

your was the actual PPI premiums and the resultant int charged on each payment etc etc

 

you cant reclaim both 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hidden PPI commission or PPI Premiums reclaim.

one or  the other 

you can't reclaim both.

 

however, for the PPI premiums paid during the life of the card..

do you have all the statements from day 1?

if not you need to have sent them an SAR before you kicked off the reclaim., and done a spreadsheet and fire that off with the FOS Questionnaire.

 

if you've  ot got the data (and they must to have made and state the history, even if wrong,   that they have done so far.

 

there no good putting in a speculative reclaim letter without data cause all you'll get back is a speculative reply cause they know you haven't a clue what you are doing or ever expect back.

 

so have you all the statements?

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...