Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CEL 2017 ANPR PCN PAPLOC Now Claimform - Burger King, West Forest Gate, Wokingham, RG40 2AT *** Claim Discontinued***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 916 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

 

Today I've received a 'LETTER BEFORE ACTION - CLAIM FOR DEBT' from Civil Enforcement Limited for a supposed breach of parking 32 months ago. They haven't provided me any evidence to my address which I've lived at and been registered to for the past 24 months. 

 

They have sent me a form to reply to which is asking for name, address, contact number, email and to comment whether I owe the debt, i am getting debt advice and another section where i can ask them for further documents or information. 

 

At this stage I cannot confirm that I had parked at this premises. Being a Burger King I have visited with the children in the past when I lived in Wokingham.

 

Seeking advice of next steps please?

 

 

1 Date of the infringement

04/12/2017

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date]

Unknown

 

3 Date received

03/08/2020
 

 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?]

Unknown
 

 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event?

None provided
 

 

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal]

No
 

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up

N/A
 

 

7 Who is the parking company?

Civil Enforcement Limited
 

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town]

Burger King, West Forest Gate, Wokingham, RG40 2AT
 

 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.

None

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your prompt response. Do you have reference to the SAR document template? Thank you!

 

But also, if I ask for a DSAR, I think need to provide them with my contact details or shall I just input my address which they posted to?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to CEL 2017 ANPR PCN - Burger King, West Forest Gate, Wokingham, RG40 2AT - First contact 32 months since 'breach of terms'

How's this?


To whom it concerns, I am in receipt of your letter dated the 3rd August 2020 and have noted its contents.

 

You state that I should consider this to be a letter before action. Unfortunately for you I cannot accept this shoddily thrown together piece of tripe to be a LBA as it fails miserably to come anywhere near an LBA as required under the revised Civil Procedure Regulations and so would expect a court to summarily dismiss any claim later made by you or your client on that basis.

  

So, to make sure that there is no misunderstanding, I deny that any monies are owed to Civil Enforcement Limited by myself. The same applies to the inflated amount of the claim, the POFA and contract law are very clear on this point and again plenty of examples of dismissed claims are in the public domain.

 

Your fondness for misquoting the decision of PE v Beavis makes it look like you have never read the full judgement but like the other ‘rent a threat’ see it as a panacea for justifying any old codswallop you care to trot out.

 

It’s not wise or in the interests of Civil Enforcement Limited to continue with this matter as they have no cause for action, and I shall seek a full cost recovery order for any civil claim made under the unreasonableness criteria.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hehehe, i dont like to sit on things!!!

So I've made the changes you suggested.

 

On another forum, they advised emailing all of this to not waste any further of my time.

Do you have any objections to emailing this letter and the DSAR?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Community, me again!

So they responded to my DSAR I sent on 18th Aug, They responded on the 9th Sept. They haven't responded to my snotty letter yet.

 

In summary of the DSAR.

Offence date: 4th Dec 2017
From: 04/12/17 16:16:43 to 17:29:40
Offence: Exceeded maximum 60 minutes free parking

Fine: £100 or £60 within 14 days

First letter date: 02/07/2018

First PCN letter date: 02/07/2018

(this is 8 months post offence date)

Second letter date: 05/09/2018 (wrong address)

Letter stating price has gone up to £140 and if not paid, will be passed to collection agents.

 

Third letter date: 31/01/2020 (wrong address)

ZZPS Limited debt collector. Price has now gone to £170.

 

Fourth letter date: 14/02/2020

ZZPS Limited debt collector. Price remains at £170

Fifth and final letter which was sent to my correct address:  03/08/2020
CEL, letter before court action 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 i attach all 3 files from the council which date back to 1994.

They were unable to find anything else in relation to car parking permits or erection of ANPR cameras etc.

There is nothing else specific to CEL of which they can provide me.

 

35731.pdf 42365.pdf

41585.pdf

 

I have not heard back from CEL in response to my letter i sent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning,

 

Received a letter today dated 1/10/20.

DO NOT IGNORE - FINAL REMINDER BEFORE LEGAL ACTION, AMOUNT DUE £182

Dear sir/madam,

 

We previously sent you a letter before action in which you were advised that failure to response would result in legal action being commenced. However, we wish to provide you with a final opportunity to settle this matter before commencing legal action. If the amount due is not paid within 14 days of the date of this letter we will now issue legal proceedings, and the amount due will increase by over £75.

if you ignore this letter and fail to respond, proceedings will be issued against you and may increase your liability for costs.

Yours faithfully, 
Legal Team

CEL

 

Not worried. No letter of claim sent :) . They've clearly not paid any attention to my snotty letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

no letters over the past week however the 14 day deadline was yesterday.

 

I happened to be away from home last week and so visited the location of the 'ticket'.

The ANPR camera is erected on the building of the burger king - Do they need planning for this?

 

The entry sign warning of parking restrictions is bent (by a vehicle I'd presume as its high level) and is partly covered by branches. No idea if this was the case years ago however it's possible to park without noticing the restrictions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...

Good morning,

 

This morning I have received a 'claim form' with a claim no. and claim date of 09/02/21.

 

Particular of claims:

Claim for monies relating to a parking charge for parking in a private car park managed by the claimant in breach of the terms + conditions (T+Cs). Drivers are allowed to park in accordance with T+Cs of use. ANPR camera and/or manual patrols are used to monitor vehicles entering + exiting the site. Debt + damages claimed the sum of £182.
Violation date: XX/XX/2017
Time in: 16:16 

Time out: 17:29
PCN Ref: XXXXX

Total due: £182
The claimant claims the sum of £228.35 for monies relating to a parking charge per above including 46.35 interest pursuant to s.69 of the county courts act 1984 rate of 8% pa from dates above to 08/02/21. Same rate to judgment or sooner payment daily rate to judgement 0.04 total debt and interest due £228.35. 

Amount claimed: £228.35
Court fee: £25
Legal costs: £50
Total amount £303.35


------------------------------

I know its quite an ask but what would the advice be here? I cannot confirm I overstayed but with ANPR its unlikely that they're wrong.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your prompt response. I really cannot be dealing with receiving a CCJ or even taking the risk of getting one due to my current situation. Sure, I've been unable to find any planning permission for the erection of the ANPR camera and signage but that doesn't deny the fact I was there, as the ANPR says so. 

I need to pay this but maybe I can reduce the cost in someway?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to CEL 2017 ANPR PCN Claimform - Burger King, West Forest Gate, Wokingham, RG40 2AT - First contact 32 months since 'breach of terms'
  • dx100uk changed the title to CEL 2017 ANPR PCN PAPLOC Now Claimform - Burger King, West Forest Gate, Wokingham, RG40 2AT - First contact 32 months since 'breach of terms'

Thanks for all your help so far. 

 

I've completed the MCOL acknowledgement and I've prepared the CPR 31.14 Request, which I will post via recorded deliver tomorrow.

 

So my fundamentals for my defense are that I overstayed by 13minutes whilst I was feeding my daughter in the BurgerKing of which this CEL carpark is solely used for. Their is no planning permission to the councils knowledge and the signature is not clear. Also, the costs incurred are ludacris.

 

Is there any links which can help me build this defense?

 

Should I wait to submit defense or get it in early?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all your consistent help so far. You must be busy with people asking for help and as so I am grateful.

 

So to confirm my only two tasks are:
1. Send the CPR13.41 request via post

2. Prepare and upload defence.

 

Do I have to attend the court hearing in person/via zoom or is it decided behind closed doors?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...