Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

?/BW windscreen PCN claimform - Employee hospital parking


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1638 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My mum works for the NHS and was parked in an allocated bay for employees, however she received a parking ticket.

 

We disputed this and it was declined and has now been passed to another company, bwlegal I believe.

 

We asked for photographic evidence and the date on the photo was Jan 2015, however the ticket was issued on jan 2016.

 

We didn't own the car in 2015, and my argument with the company is that the evidence didn't match the date of the supposed offense and if we were to goto court, the court would throw it out because of inconsistent dates...

 

Bwlegal state that it must have been an error on the camera and that the payment is still due, I said how can it be, it's like me placing you at the scene of a crime in January 2016 but my evidence shows Jan 2015,the court wouldn't accept that evidence ,they said we will still persue the debt and the amount will keep increasing.

 

Out of principle we don't wish to pay as my mum was entitled to park there however they have rejected those grounds and even if her boss writes to them they say not possible to appeal...

 

Any advice would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Hi

 

My mum works at a NHS hospital and was parked in her car park when at work.

 

The car parking company sent her a ticket which she said contested as was entitled to park there etc, the more she called the more letters they sent. 

 

After a while she stopped contacting them and they stopped...Then a year later she got a demand to pay...She then requested a photo of her car etc, they sent a photo with the wrong date, which is different to the date on the ticket...The date on the photo is before she owned the car. 

 

She again didn't pay as told the debt collection agency she doesnt agree with the ticket as she was in her allocated bay.

 

She has now been sent a county court letter where she needs to either pay, or fill in some papers to defend her case...

 

As their evidence has the wrong date, could the court throw it out as we can prove we didnt own the car on the date of the photo and because the date on photo doesnt match the ticket she got?

Link to post
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, BankFodder said:

It would be helpful if you started by telling us which company you are dealing with and also which hospital.

 

I cant remember the company name I will get the details...

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to ?/BW windscreen PCN claimform - Employee hospital parking
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...