Motonovo & DWF LLP - not sure what do

[dx100uk]

dwf just chase debts ignore them.

 

on VT you will owe upto the 50% mark after the auction sale price of the car is removed from the balance to 50% owing

 

looks ilke they pulled a fast one and did VS because you didn't reply to something that should be in writing only not a text nor email.

 

they will also have charged you repo fees which they cant.

 

 

so have you a breakdown of the figure you owe?

what did they get for the car?

how much was 50% of your agreement, should be listed on the reverse side.

 

the fact tht you didn't WRITE and demand VT is immaterial as they state they knew you wanted VT.

 

pers id ignore them and let them do court as there is little they'll win at there with the trail of evidence you wanted to VT, NOT VS [owe they whole lot]

 

dwf are simply solicitor gofers i'd ignore them and block all text/email now.

 

 

so give us the figures please

[dx100uk]

looks like you owe nowt to me.

they might even owe you!!

 

50% of TAP is … £6079.88

so with the payments you actually made and the sale of the car that well exceeds that figure

if you have good written proof via your comms that you wanted VT not VS, pers i'd ignore them and let them goto court where by you'll prove you case and counterclaim for the excess over £6079.88 back .

 

upto you if you ignore or WRITE ONLY telling them the above.

 

pers I think they are trying to pull a fast one and see if you can be mugged.

[dx100uk]

in post 1

 

There was a Voluntary Termination clause in the agreement, which I had told Motonovo I would like to use,

 

if you have proof of this, gameover for them.

[dx100uk]

its a shame you appears to have gone radio silent on them once you knew about vt.

 

were you made aware there was a serious financial difference between VT and VS at anytime by them?...

 

cause if you were IMHO, they have [rubbing their hands together] taken the option that made them the most money.

 

urm…

 

when was your last payment?

 

did you instigate comms with them after that wanting to resolve the issue...or did they have to kick you to make you 1st respond to the outstanding sums and what date was this?

[dx100uk]

so your troubles with paying them date from an earlier time then..when did your troubles start?

 

were you made aware there was a serious financial difference between VT and VS at anytime by them?...

 

did they have to kick you to make your 1st respond to the outstanding sums ? or did you contact them first and explain you had issues?

[dx100uk]

so at no point did they even mention vs which is the route that they took

everything seems to be indicating and keeping to the line that you wanted vt from the very 1st time they mentioned it, never once mentioning vs.

 

imho you have a very good case here.

 

so upto you.

 

either

await the sar.

 

or write back now,

stating you feel it is unfair they have 'taken advantage of your simple failure to say yes to vt' to charge you more than what they should when it was clear from the get go that vt was the way you wanted to go.

 

they have failed to treat you fairly

[dx100uk]

either above not write stating you'll await the sar.

 

pers i'd do the latter.