Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HMRC bill paid in full but still being harassed by DCA


juneberry
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3302 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Advise them that if they decide to visit your home you'll just ask them to leave.

They can't force entry or seize goods without a court order,

and if they went to court you'd just show that you have paid the debt.

 

Thank them for their interest but remind them it is paid.

 

Let them huff and puff.

 

 

Repeat "it has been paid, you have no powers, if you feel otherwise feel free to take it to court.

 

In court : you'll be laughed at." (Edit: this is your comment to them - you [the OP] won't be laughed at!)

 

"Feel free to threaten all you like but there is nothing you can do without court

: and since I've already paid that is never going to happen!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome juneberry,

 

Try to get the HMRC to change their instructions to the debt cillectors, the exterior agencies are pretty mercenary, they simply work to the schedule of debts provided by HMRC, which may or may not be accurate.

 

HMRC are so slow at correcting errors.

 

After informing them of their error, also inform them that any further attempts to collect debts that are non-existent/disputed/not due will be subject to a formal police complaint under section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970.

 

The following are useful points to remember when dealing with 3rd party debt collection agencies claiming on behalf of HMRC:

 

Section 40 of The Administration of Justice Act 1970 makes it a Criminal Offence for a debt collection agency to make demands for money, which are aimed at causing 'alarm, distress or humiliation, because of their frequency or publicity or manner'. Equally, a debt collection agency will be committing an offence if they falsely imply that non-payment of the debt will lead to criminal proceedings; or they pretend to be someone they are not e.g. HMRC staff, court officials or bailiffs. It is also an offence to send a person a document which looks like it has been sent from a court.

 

The Protection from Harassment Act 1997

 

If you feel you are subject to harassment from a debt collection agency then this too could be classed as a criminal offence. Harassment can be verbal or in writing and would include making repeated calls to your workplace or in anti social hours. The Protection from Harassment Act 1997 makes it a Criminal Offence for any person to pursue a course of action "which they know, or ought to know, amounts to harassment of another person". If you categorically state to the caller that you consider their actions to be harassment then they have been put on notice.

 

If you think a debt collection agency has broken the law you should first raise it with the debt collection agency concerned. To start this process you will need to gather evidence. The first step is to record the times and contents of visits and calls, and to save any threatening letters. You should then write a letter of complaint informing the debt collection agency that you believe they are in breach of section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act. Ask them to stop what they are doing. You must however, tell the debt collection agency how you would prefer yourself to be contacted. If the situation does not improve you can make a more formal complaint against a creditor.

 

If the debt collection agency continues to harass you, contact the following for further advice:

 

Trading Standards

Citizens Advice Bureau

Office of Fair Trading

 

OFT ceased to exist in 2014.

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/office-of-fair-trading

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

This particular threat was made during one of their many telephone calls, so I do not have written proof. Someone from the agency told me on the phone that they had the powers to do this if I did not pay them immediately. Even when I told them I had already paid the bill they simply repeated that they could take me to court, call at my home and take my possessions for sale to cover the amount owing.

They just won't listen that the account has been settled.

 

I'm surprised they didn't also say they'd have you trans-shipped to the Antipodes and/or your first-born seized and sold into servitude.

 

I've heard "there are lies, damned lies, and statistics"

Add to the end : "and then there is the piffle DCA's will spout!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

aha the old telephone gags

 

nothing you can do sadly

 

you should never ever discuss your debts

or talk on the phone to a DCA

 

writing only put the phone down..simples.

 

you'll know for next time.

 

you are under no legal remit to discuss or pay for supposed debts

on the phone or at your door

 

a DCA is NOT A BAILIFF.

 

sadly you fell for the oldest trick in the book.

 

dx

 

I'm not sure the OP fell for anything : they haven't paid the DCA a penny (nor should they).

However, the info on this thread should reassure the OP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...